Literature DB >> 21939692

The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability.

Jacqueline Williams1, Alan J Pearce, Michela Loporto, Tony Morris, Paul S Holmes.   

Abstract

It is commonly reported that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex during action observation and motor imagery results in increases in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in muscles specific to the observed or imagined action. This study aimed to determine whether MEP amplitude was related to the motor imagery ability of participants. Participants were 15 healthy, right-handed adults (five male), with a mean age of 29.7 years. Motor imagery ability was measured using the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) and a hand rotation task. TMS was delivered during observation and imagery of a finger-thumb opposition sequence and MEPs were measured in the abductor pollicis brevis. Significant increases in MEP amplitude, from baseline, were recorded during observation and imagery conditions. The change in amplitude to both observation and imagery was expressed as a percentage of baseline amplitude. There was a significant correlation between MEP change for the imagery condition and imagery ability, with greater change linked to more vivid images and faster response times. The relationship between MEP change for the observation condition and imagery ability was less salient. This is the first study to show that the strength of corticospinal activation during imagery, which may be a determinant of the effectiveness of imagery training, is related to imagery ability in the general population, and has implications for clinical programs.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939692     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  39 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Izumi Umehara; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts.

Authors:  Stéphane Grade; Arnaud Badets; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks.

Authors:  Bülent Cengiz; Doğa Vurallı; Murat Zinnuroğlu; Gözde Bayer; Hassan Golmohammadzadeh; Zafer Günendi; Ali Emre Turgut; Bülent İrfanoğlu; Kutluk Bilge Arıkan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Motor Imagery Training on Muscle Strength and Gait Performance in Ambulant Stroke Subjects-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Vijaya K Kumar; M Chakrapani; Rakshith Kedambadi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 7.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Effects of action observation and motor imagery of walking on the corticospinal and spinal motoneuron excitability and motor imagery ability in healthy participants.

Authors:  Naotsugu Kaneko; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Yohei Masugi; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motor cortical plasticity induced by motor learning through mental practice.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Nicolas Gueugneau; Ambra Bisio; Piero Ruggeri; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Marco Bove
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Reflecting on mirror mechanisms: motor resonance effects during action observation only present with low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michela Loporto; Paul S Holmes; David J Wright; Craig J McAllister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.