Literature DB >> 29549593

Introducing Short Interpulse Intervals in High-Rate Pulse Trains Enhances Binaural Timing Sensitivity in Electric Hearing.

Sridhar Srinivasan1, Bernhard Laback2, Piotr Majdak1, Bertrand Delgutte3.   

Abstract

Common envelope-based stimulation strategies for cochlear implants (CIs) use relatively high carrier rates in order to properly encode the speech envelope. For such rates, CI listeners show poor sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), which are important for horizontal-plane sound localization and spatial unmasking of speech. Based on the findings from previous studies, we predicted that ITD sensitivity can be enhanced by including pulses with short interpulse intervals (SIPIs), to a 1000-pulses-per-second (pps) reference pulse train. We measured the sensitivity of eight bilateral CI listeners to ITD while systematically varying both the rate at which SIPIs are introduced ("SIPI rate") and the time interval between the two pulses forming a SIPI ("SIPI fraction"). Results showed largely enhanced ITD sensitivity relative to the reference condition, with the size of the improvement increasing with decreasing SIPI rate and decreasing SIPI fraction. For the lowest SIPI fraction, insertion of extra pulses brought ITD sensitivity to the level measured for low-rate pulse trains with rates matching the SIPI rates. The results appear promising for the goal of enhancing ITD sensitivity with envelope-based CI strategies by inserting SIPI pulses at strategic times in speech stimuli.

Keywords:  ITD sensitivity; bilateral cochlear implant; binaural timing cues; high-rate stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29549593      PMCID: PMC5962474          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0659-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  41 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

3.  A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction.

Authors:  D J Kistler; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Yang-Soo Yoon; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Komal Arora; Pam Dawson; Richard Dowell; Andrew Vandali
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity Using Short Inter-pulse Intervals with Amplitude-Modulated Pulse Trains in Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sridhar Srinivasan; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-10

2.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation Partially Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity in Neonatally-Deaf Rabbits.

Authors:  Woongsang Sunwoo; Bertrand Delgutte; Yoojin Chung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl; Alexa N Buck; Kongyan Li; Jan Wh Schnupp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Auditory Brainstem Models: Adapting Cochlear Nuclei Improve Spatial Encoding by the Medial Superior Olive in Reverberation.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; Mathias Dietz; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-16

6.  Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Maike Klingel; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.