Literature DB >> 29549308

Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the material.

Freek V W Appels1, Jan Dijksterhuis2, Catherine E Lukasiewicz1, Kaspar M B Jansen3, Han A B Wösten4, Pauline Krijgsheld1.   

Abstract

Filamentous fungi colonize substrates by forming a mycelium. This network of hyphae can be used as a bio-based material. Here, we assessed the impact of environmental growth conditions and deletion of the hydrophobin gene sc3 on material properties of the mycelium of the mushroom forming fungus Schizophyllum commune. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that Δsc3 mycelium retained more water with increasing temperature when compared to the wild type. The Young's modulus (E) of the mycelium ranged between 438 and 913 MPa when the wild type strain was grown in the dark or in the light at low or high CO2 levels. This was accompanied by a maximum tensile strength (σ) of 5.1-9.6 MPa. In contrast, E and σ of the Δsc3 strain were 3-4- fold higher with values of 1237-2727 MPa and 15.6-40.4 MPa, respectively. These values correlated with mycelium density, while no differences in chemical composition of the mycelia were observed as shown by ATR-FTIR. Together, genetic modification and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of the mycelium by affecting the density of the mycelium. As a result, mechanical properties of wild type mycelium were similar to those of natural materials, while those of Δsc3 were more similar to thermoplastics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29549308      PMCID: PMC5856774          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23171-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The use of bio-based materials is part of the conversion to a circular economy. These materials are derived from molecules or structures of microbes, plants, macro-algae, and animals. Plant-derived thermoplastic starch[1], bacterial-derived polyhydroxyalkanoic acid[2], and fungal mycelium[3-6] are examples of bio-based materials. Fungal mycelia consist of hyphae that grow at their tips and branch subapically. The internal turgor pressure and the rigid cell walls enable hyphae to penetrate organic material such as plant waste. Secreted enzymes degrade polymers in the substrate into molecules that can be taken up to serve as nutrients. Fungal mycelia can cover huge areas, in particular those of mushroom forming fungi. For instance, the mycelium of an Armillaria individual had colonized almost 10 km2 of forest[7]. Schizophyllum commune is a model for mushroom forming fungi[8]. Germination of its basidiospores results in a vegetative mycelium that colonizes fallen branches and logs of hardwood. Fusion of two individuals with compatible mating type loci results in a fertile mycelium. Fruiting is induced upon exposure to blue light and ambient CO2 (i.e. 400 ppm). The outer layer of the S. commune cell wall consists of a water-soluble mucilage of (1,3)(1,6)-β-glucan[9]. This so called schizophyllan is also secreted into the culture medium. A (1,3)-α-linked glucan is located beneath the mucilage, while the inner layer of the cell wall consists of chitin cross-linked to a highly branched (1,3)(1,6)-β-glucan[9,10]. The SC3 hydrophobin impacts cell wall composition of S. commune. In the absence of this cell wall protein the amount of schizophyllan is increased, while the amount of glucan that is cross-linked to chitin is reduced[11]. SC3 also attaches hyphae to hydrophobic surfaces[12], mediates escape of hyphae from the aqueous environment into the air[13], and makes aerial structures hydrophobic[14,15]. The latter is illustrated by the fact that wild type mycelium has a water contact angle of 115 degrees, being similar to the highly hydrophobic surface of Teflon, while water immediately soaks into the mycelium of the Δsc3 strain[15]. Here, we assessed properties of wild type and Δsc3 mycelium of S. commune grown in the light or in the dark at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. Mycelium of strain Δsc3 retained more water with increasing temperature when compared to that of the wild type. Both the absence of SC3 and environmental conditions affected mechanical properties of the mycelium, which can be explained by changes in the density in the mycelium. Together, genetic modification and environmental growth conditions can be used to create a palette of mycelium materials.

Results and Discussion

Environmental conditions and deletion of sc3 impact the density of mycelium

Mycelium of the wild type and the hydrophobin deletion strain Δsc3 was grown as a liquid static culture (see Material and Methods) in the light or in the dark at 400 ppm (low) or 70,000 ppm (high) CO2. Density of wild type mycelium grown at low CO2 in the dark or at high CO2 in the light was similar (819–1026 kg m−3; Fig. 1, Table 1). Lower densities were obtained after growing at high CO2 in the dark (683 kg m−3) and at low CO2 in the light (515 kg m−3). The relation between mycelium density, CO2, and light is not clear yet. Possibly, it results from interacting signaling pathways that respond to light and CO2.
Figure 1

Density of mycelia of liquid static cultures of wild type (non-shaded bars) and ∆sc3 (grey shaded bars) grown in the dark or light at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. Different letters indicate significant differences (two-tailed independent-sample t-test, n = 15, p < 0.05).

Table 1

Young’s modulus (E), maximum tensile strength (σ), elongation at breaking (ε), and density of mycelium of wild type and ∆sc3 S. commune strains grown in the light or in the dark at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. n = 5; average ± SEM.

StrainGrowth conditionE (mPa)σ (mPa)ε (%)Density (kg m−3)
Wild typeDark, low CO2749 ± 499.6 ± 1.11.2 ± 0.1819 ± 18
Dark, high CO2550 ± 486.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.1683 ± 17
Light, low CO2438 ± 405.1 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.1515 ± 10
Light, high CO2913 ± 699.5 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.11026 ± 46
sc3Dark, low CO22523 ± 18433.9 ± 2.81.7 ± 0.22101 ± 18
Dark, high CO21237 ± 10815.6 ± 2.31.9 ± 0.1984 ± 36
Light, low CO21914 ± 15622.3 ± 1.51.8 ± 0.11562 ± 56
Light, high CO22727 ± 9540.4 ± 2.52.6 ± 0.51902 ± 38
Density of mycelia of liquid static cultures of wild type (non-shaded bars) and ∆sc3 (grey shaded bars) grown in the dark or light at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. Different letters indicate significant differences (two-tailed independent-sample t-test, n = 15, p < 0.05). Young’s modulus (E), maximum tensile strength (σ), elongation at breaking (ε), and density of mycelium of wild type and ∆sc3 S. commune strains grown in the light or in the dark at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. n = 5; average ± SEM. Density of Δsc3 mycelium resulting from the different growth conditions followed a similar trend as the wild type, but was in all conditions 1.4–3 fold higher (Fig. 1; Table 1). As expected[13], scanning electron microscopy revealed that Δsc3 mycelium lacked the thick layer of aerial hyphae observed in the wild type that is characterized by a low hyphal density (Fig. 2). Lower density of the wild type mycelium is also explained by the fact that hyphae of Δsc3, but not those of wild type, were embedded in a mucilage. This mucilage is most probably schizophyllan that is abundantly released by strain Δsc3[11].
Figure 2

Cryo-SEM microscopy showing an overview (A,B) and detailed morphology (C,D) of two mycelium layers of S. commune Δsc3 (A,C) and wild type (B,D) that had been grown in light and low CO2 and that had been dried on top of each other (this was required to enable mechanical analysis of strain Δsc3). a indicates air exposed sites of the mycelium during culturing, while s indicates substrate exposed sites. Bar represents 10 μm.

Cryo-SEM microscopy showing an overview (A,B) and detailed morphology (C,D) of two mycelium layers of S. commune Δsc3 (A,C) and wild type (B,D) that had been grown in light and low CO2 and that had been dried on top of each other (this was required to enable mechanical analysis of strain Δsc3). a indicates air exposed sites of the mycelium during culturing, while s indicates substrate exposed sites. Bar represents 10 μm.

Environmental conditions and deletion of sc3 impact mechanical properties of mycelium

Mechanical properties were determined of wild type and Δsc3 mycelium grown in liquid static cultures in the light or in the dark at high or low CO2. The Young’s modulus (E) of the wild type strain grown in the light increased from 438 to 913 MPa as a result of increased CO2 levels (Fig. 3A, Table 1). In contrast, high CO2 in the dark resulted in a lower E when compared to low CO2 levels (550 to 749 MPa). Similar results were obtained with the maximum strength (Fig. 3B, Table 1). Mycelium of the wild type grown in the dark at high and low CO2 had a maximum strength (σ) of 6.5 and 9.6 MPa, respectively. These values were 9.5 and 5.1 MPa, respectively, when wild type mycelium was grown in the light. The elongation at breaking of wild type mycelia was between 1.2 and 1.4% and was not affected by the growth conditions (Fig. 3C; Table 1). Mycelium of Δsc3 had a higher E and σ when compared to wild type under all growth conditions (Fig. 3AB; Table 1). E of Δsc3 grown in the light increased from 1914 MPa to 2727 MPa as a result of increased CO2 levels (Fig. 3A; Table 1). In contrast, an increase in CO2 in the dark resulted in a decrease of the Young’s modulus from 2523 MPa to 1237 MPa. Similar results were obtained with σ (Fig. 3B; Table 1). Mycelium of Δsc3 grown in the dark at high CO2 had a σ of 15.6 MPa, while mycelium grown at low CO2 had a σ of 33.9 MPa. These values were 40.4 and 22.3 MPa, respectively, when mycelium was grown in the light. Elongation of Δsc3 mycelia at breaking was not affected by the environmental conditions (Fig. 3C; Table 1), but it was higher than wild type in dark and low CO2 (1.7 vs 1.2%), light and low CO2 (1.8 vs 1.3%), and light and high CO2
Figure 3

Young’s modulus (A), maximum tensile strength at breaking (B), and elongation at breaking (C) of mycelia of liquid static cultures of wild type (non-shaded bars) and ∆sc3 (grey shaded bars) grown in the dark or light at high or low CO2. Different letters indicate significant differences (two-tailed independent sample t-test, n = 15, p < 0.05).

Young’s modulus (A), maximum tensile strength at breaking (B), and elongation at breaking (C) of mycelia of liquid static cultures of wild type (non-shaded bars) and ∆sc3 (grey shaded bars) grown in the dark or light at high or low CO2. Different letters indicate significant differences (two-tailed independent sample t-test, n = 15, p < 0.05). (2.6 vs 1.3%). Reintroducing sc3 in strain Δsc3 restored E, σ, and elongation at breaking to wild type levels (data not shown), showing that the differences in properties between wild type and Δsc3 is due to the absence of SC3. Interestingly, E and σ correlated with the density of the mycelium (R2 = 0.91 (p < 0.01), R2 = 0.83 (p < 0.01)), respectively. This is generally observed with natural composites and polymers[16]. Together, both wild type and Δsc3 mycelium behaved as rigid and brittle materials, also indicated by their typical stress strain curves (Supplementary Figure 2). Notably, E and σ of S. commune mycelium were up to 227 and 37-fold stronger when compared to Pleurotus ostreatus and Ganoderma lucidum[4]. However, elongation at breaking was higher for the latter species being up to 13-fold in the case of G. lucidum.

Mycelia of wild type and ∆sc3 have a similar chemical composition as indicated by ATR-FTIR

Chemical composition of the mycelia was determined with attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Spectra of wild type and ∆sc3 were similar and also did not change with the different environmental conditions (Fig. 4; Supplementary Figure 1; Table 2; Supplementary Table S1). As expected[9], signals originating from lipids and protein were low, while those of carbohydrate were high. Previously, it was shown that ∆sc3 has an increased amount of schizophyllan and a reduced amount of glucan cross-linked to chitin[11]. ATR-FTIR spectra indicate that the amount of glucan produced by wild type and ∆sc3 was similar but that the wild type has a higher degree of cross-linking. These results and the correlation between E and σ with density of the mycelium show that differences in mechanical properties between mycelia of wild type and ∆sc3 grown at different environmental conditions can be solely explained by the density of the mycelium.
Figure 4

ATR-FTIR spectra of liquid static cultures of S. commune wild type and Δsc3 grown in light and low CO2. Similar absorption peaks were observed between strains, indicating that the mycelia had a similar chemical composition. Definition of wavenumber regions I-V can be found in Table 2. Spectra were obtained in quadruple.

Table 2

Wavenumber regions in ATR-FTIR spectral windows and their dominating chemical compounds (linked macromolecules), and functional group assignments. Adapted from Naumann[21].

Symbolṽ (cm−1)MacromoleculeAssignment
I3700–2996variousO-H, N-H
II2996–2800lipidC-H
III1800–1485proteinAmide I + II
IV1485–1185Protein, lipid, phosphate compoundCH2, CH3 P=O
V1185–900PolysaccharideC-O-C, C-O-P
ATR-FTIR spectra of liquid static cultures of S. commune wild type and Δsc3 grown in light and low CO2. Similar absorption peaks were observed between strains, indicating that the mycelia had a similar chemical composition. Definition of wavenumber regions I-V can be found in Table 2. Spectra were obtained in quadruple. Wavenumber regions in ATR-FTIR spectral windows and their dominating chemical compounds (linked macromolecules), and functional group assignments. Adapted from Naumann[21].

Thermogravimetric analysis of mycelial films

Thermogravimetric analysis revealed that thermal degradation of wild type and ∆sc3 was most pronounced between ± 225 and 300 °C (Fig. 5), being similar to P. ostreatus and G. lucidum[4]. Notably, weight loss at 100 °C differed between wild type and ∆sc3 irrespective of the growth conditions (7.5% vs 5.0%, respectively, p < 0.001, data not shown). This indicates that the absence of SC3 leads to a higher water activity. This is in line with the hydrophilicity of the mycelium of the deletion strain, which is in contrast with the hydrophobic nature of the wild-type hyphae that are in contact with air[14,15].
Figure 5

Thermogravimetric analysis of mycelia of S. commune wild type and ∆sc3 grown in the dark at low (C1) and high (C2) CO2 and in the light at low (C3) and high (C4) CO2. Experiments were performed in duplicate.

Thermogravimetric analysis of mycelia of S. commune wild type and ∆sc3 grown in the dark at low (C1) and high (C2) CO2 and in the light at low (C3) and high (C4) CO2. Experiments were performed in duplicate.

Conclusions

Fungal mycelium offers an attractive bio-based material because of its mechanical properties and by the fact that it grows on low quality waste streams such as straw and sawdust. We here showed that mechanical properties of mycelium of S. commune can be changed by adapting environmental conditions and by inactivating the sc3 hydrophobin gene. E and σ of the deletion strain were 3–4-fold higher when compared to the wild type. Notably, they were up to 227- and 37-fold higher, respectively, when compared to mycelium of P. ostreatus and G. lucidum. Yet, the latter species formed a more elastic mycelium[4]. Both CO2 and light affected material properties of S. commune. For instance, wild type mycelium showed a 1.7-fold higher E in light compared to dark when grown at high CO2. Conversely, E was 2.1-fold higher when light-grown wild type was cultivated at low and high CO2. Differences in E and σ between the different strains and culture conditions were shown to be caused by differences in density of the mycelium and not by differences in chemical composition. The mechanical properties of wild type are similar to those of plant materials (e.g. wood, cork, bamboo) and animal material (leather), while those of Δsc3 are more similar to thermoplastics (e.g. polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride). This is mainly caused by increased density and not by increased strength of the material (Fig. 6). The palette of fungal materials can be further diversified by treating mycelium chemically or physically.
Figure 6

Material family chart of the Young’s modulus (E) (GPa) vs density (kg m−3). Mycelium of wild type S. commune has properties similar to those of natural materials, while ∆sc3 mycelium behaves like polymers. Figure adapted from[16].

Material family chart of the Young’s modulus (E) (GPa) vs density (kg m−3). Mycelium of wild type S. commune has properties similar to those of natural materials, while ∆sc3 mycelium behaves like polymers. Figure adapted from[16].

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

S. commune wild type strain 4–39 (CBS 341.81) and its derivative Δsc3[17] were used in this study. A quarter of a 7-day-old colony grown on agar minimal medium (MM)[18] was homogenized in 50 ml MM for 30 s at low speed using a Waring Blender (Waring Laboratory, Torrington, England). The homogenate was grown for 24 h at 200 rpm and 30 °C, after which the culture was homogenized. Static liquid cultures were inoculated by taking up 600 mg wet weight mycelial homogenate in a volume of 6 mL MM and spreading it in a 9 cm Petri dish. Cultures were grown at 30 °C in the light (2000 Lux from 5 W LED spot lights, Calex, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) or in the dark at 400 or 70,000 ppm CO2. After 3 days, 30 mL MM was applied underneath the mycelial mat[19] and growth was prolonged for 5 days at 30 °C.

Complementation of the Δsc3 strain

The coding sequence of sc3 with 995 bp upstream and 301 bp downstream flanking sequences was amplified by PCR using High-Fidelity Phusion polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, USA). The PCR fragment was cloned into plasmid pUC20Nour that consists of a nourseothricin resistance cassette in a pUC20 backbone[20]. The resulting vector pUC20sc3Nour was introduced into Δsc3 as described[20]. A first selection was performed using 8 µg mL−1 nourseothricin (Jena Biosciences, Jena, Germany) and 500 µg mL−1 caffeine (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Nourseothricin resistant colonies were transferred to a 2nd selection plate containing 20 µg mL−1 nourseothricin. Colonies were screened by immunodetection using SC3-antiserum[15]. To this end, transformants were grown for 3 days at 30 °C on perforated polycarbonate (PC) membranes (Maine Manufacturing, Sanford, ME, USA; pore size 0.1 µm) on MM agar. The colonies with the underlying PC membrane were transferred for 1 h to a fresh MM agar plate on which a PVDF membrane was placed. Immunodetection of SC3 on the PVDF membranes was performed as described[15].

Tensile measurements

Mycelium of two liquid static cultures was dried on top of each other at room temperature. Thickness of the mycelium was measured by a high accuracy length gauge (Heidenhain MT1281, Traunreut, Germany). Tensile measurements of 3 mycelium rectangular specimen (18 × 4 mm) of 5 biological replicas were performed using the Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer Q800 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) equipped with an 18 N capacity load cell. The Young’s modulus (E) was obtained by taking the stress/strain slope in the 0.10% to 0.15% strain range. The maximum strength (σ) was obtained from force per unit area, while elongation at breaking point (ε) was obtained by determining the strain (in mm) at the moment of breaking.

Thermogravimetric analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis was performed with a TGA Q50 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Measurements were performed with 25–30 mg of mycelium in a platinum pan under a constant flow of nitrogen gas (60 mL min−1). Temperature increased from 20 to 600 °C with a rate of 10 °C min−1. Each experiment was performed using biological duplicates.

Chemical analysis of mycelial films with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy

Spectra of mycelia were recorded using a PerkinElmer ATR-FTIR spectrometer with a diamond/ZnSe crystal (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Each spectrum was measured between 4000 cm−1 to 650 cm−1 and compiled from 10 accumulated scans. Four samples were measured per strain per growth condition. Mycelium was placed with their bottom side facing the crystal.

Scanning Electron microscopy

Mycelium of two liquid static cultures was dried on top of each other at room temperature. Small rectangles (3 × 3 mm) were cut with a scalpel and attached with a 2 mm piece of Scotch tape in a 1 cm ø copper cup. After snap-freezing with liquid nitrogen, samples were transferred to a JEOL 5600 LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) by the use of an Oxford CT1500 Cryostation. Ice was removed from the sample by sublimation at −85 °C. Gold was sputter coated for 2 min, after which micrographs were acquired at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the software package IBM SPSS statistics 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York) using two-tailed independent-samples t-Tests and Pearson correlation analysis (p ≤ 0.05).
  15 in total

1.  How a fungus escapes the water to grow into the air.

Authors:  H A Wösten; M A van Wetter; L G Lugones; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher; J G Wessels
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-01-28       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Interfacial Self-Assembly of a Fungal Hydrophobin into a Hydrophobic Rodlet Layer.

Authors:  HAB. Wosten; OMH. De Vries; JGH. Wessels
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune.

Authors:  Robin A Ohm; Jan F de Jong; Luis G Lugones; Andrea Aerts; Erika Kothe; Jason E Stajich; Ronald P de Vries; Eric Record; Anthony Levasseur; Scott E Baker; Kirk A Bartholomew; Pedro M Coutinho; Susann Erdmann; Thomas J Fowler; Allen C Gathman; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; Nicole Knabe; Ursula Kües; Walt W Lilly; Erika Lindquist; Susan Lucas; Jon K Magnuson; François Piumi; Marjatta Raudaskoski; Asaf Salamov; Jeremy Schmutz; Francis W M R Schwarze; Patricia A vanKuyk; J Stephen Horton; Igor V Grigoriev; Han A B Wösten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The fungal hydrophobin Sc3p self-assembles at the surface of aerial hyphae as a protein membrane constituting the hydrophobic rodlet layer.

Authors:  H A Wösten; S A Asgeirsdóttir; J H Krook; J H Drenth; J G Wessels
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Hydrophobin gene expression affects hyphal wall composition in Schizophyllum commune.

Authors:  M A van Wetter; H A Wösten; J H Sietsma; J G Wessels
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.495

6.  Characterization of the genome of the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune.

Authors:  J J Dons; O M de Vries; J G Wessels
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-06-20

7.  Phleomycin increases transformation efficiency and promotes single integrations in Schizophyllum commune.

Authors:  Arend F van Peer; Charissa de Bekker; Arman Vinck; Han A B Wösten; Luis G Lugones
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Advanced Materials From Fungal Mycelium: Fabrication and Tuning of Physical Properties.

Authors:  Muhammad Haneef; Luca Ceseracciu; Claudio Canale; Ilker S Bayer; Jose A Heredia-Guerrero; Athanassia Athanassiou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium.

Authors:  M R Islam; G Tudryn; R Bucinell; L Schadler; R C Picu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends.

Authors:  Ramesh P Babu; Kevin O'Connor; Ramakrishna Seeram
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Ten decadal advances in fungal biology leading towards human well-being.

Authors:  Ausana Mapook; Kevin D Hyde; Khadija Hassan; Blondelle Matio Kemkuignou; Adéla Čmoková; Frank Surup; Eric Kuhnert; Pathompong Paomephan; Tian Cheng; Sybren de Hoog; Yinggai Song; Ruvishika S Jayawardena; Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi; Tokameh Mahmoudi; Nadia Ponts; Lena Studt-Reinhold; Florence Richard-Forget; K W Thilini Chethana; Dulanjalee L Harishchandra; Peter E Mortimer; Huili Li; Saisamorm Lumyong; Worawoot Aiduang; Jaturong Kumla; Nakarin Suwannarach; Chitrabhanu S Bhunjun; Feng-Ming Yu; Qi Zhao; Doug Schaefer; Marc Stadler
Journal:  Fungal Divers       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 24.902

2.  Mycelium-Based Composite Graded Materials: Assessing the Effects of Time and Substrate Mixture on Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Ali Ghazvinian; Benay Gürsoy
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 3.  Valorization of Mushroom By-Products as a Source of Value-Added Compounds and Potential Applications.

Authors:  Filipa Antunes; Sara Marçal; Oludemi Taofiq; Alcina M M B Morais; Ana Cristina Freitas; Isabel C F R Ferreira; Manuela Pintado
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Mushroom cultivation in the circular economy.

Authors:  Daniel Grimm; Han A B Wösten
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Modified recipe to inhibit fruiting body formation for living fungal biomaterial manufacture.

Authors:  Jinhui Chang; Po Lam Chan; Yichun Xie; Ka Lee Ma; Man Kit Cheung; Hoi Shan Kwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stress Reshapes the Physiological Response of Halophile Fungi to Salinity.

Authors:  Yordanis Pérez-Llano; Eya Caridad Rodríguez-Pupo; Irina S Druzhinina; Komal Chenthamara; Feng Cai; Nina Gunde-Cimerman; Polona Zalar; Cene Gostinčar; Rok Kostanjšek; Jorge Luis Folch-Mallol; Ramón Alberto Batista-García; María Del Rayo Sánchez-Carbente
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Mycelium-Based Composites in Art, Architecture, and Interior Design: A Review.

Authors:  Maciej Sydor; Agata Bonenberg; Beata Doczekalska; Grzegorz Cofta
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Current state and future prospects of pure mycelium materials.

Authors:  Simon Vandelook; Elise Elsacker; Aurélie Van Wylick; Lars De Laet; Eveline Peeters
Journal:  Fungal Biol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Growth Characteristics of Polyporales Mushrooms for the Mycelial Mat Formation.

Authors:  Bin Bae; Minseek Kim; Sinil Kim; Hyeon-Su Ro
Journal:  Mycobiology       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Enabling community-based metrology for wood-degrading fungi.

Authors:  Rolando Perez; Marina Luccioni; Rohinton Kamakaka; Samuel Clamons; Nathaniel Gaut; Finn Stirling; Katarzyna P Adamala; Pamela A Silver; Drew Endy
Journal:  Fungal Biol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.