| Literature DB >> 29547513 |
Noelia Lahoz-García1, Antonio García-Hermoso2, Marta Milla-Tobarra3,4, Ana Díez-Fernández5,6, Alba Soriano-Cano7, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno8,9.
Abstract
The association between diet and obesity has been widely studied and it continues to be controversial; however, the extent to which cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) acts as a confounder or mediator in this relation has not been analyzed. The aim of this study is to examine if the relation between diet and obesity is mediated by CRF. In this cross-sectional study, fat mass (by electronic bioimpedance) was measured in 320 schoolchildren, aged 9-11 years. Diet was measured through two computerised 24-h dietary recalls and CRF was assessed by the 20-m shuttle run test. Simple mediation analyses were fitted. CRF acts as a partial mediator in the negative relationship between dietary factors (energy intake/weight, carbohydrate intake/weight, protein intake/weight, and fat intake/weight) and fat mass. The percentage of mediation ranged from 24.3 to 33.2%. Thus, Spanish schoolchildren with higher levels of energy and macronutrients intake had lower adiposity levels, especially when they had good levels of CRF.Entities:
Keywords: CRF; children; energy intake; fat intake; mediation; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29547513 PMCID: PMC5872776 DOI: 10.3390/nu10030358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of the study sample.
| Boys ( | Girl ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 10.0 ± 0.5 | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 0.335 |
| Weight (kg) | 38.7 ± 8.7 | 39.9 ± 9.5 | 0.236 |
| Height (cm) | 140.6 ± 6.6 | 142.9 ± 7.0 | 0.003 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.4 ± 3.6 | 19.4 ± 3.7 | 0.908 |
| WC (cm) | 68.9 ± 9.2 | 68.9 ± 9.3 | 0.978 |
| FM (%) | 24.1 ± 7.0 | 27.0 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
| FMI (kg/m2) | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 5.4 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Tanner stage * | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.345 |
| Tanner stage (I–II/III–V) (%) * | 85.6/14.4 | 87.7/12.3 | 0.721 |
| CRF (mL/kg/min) | 44.33 ± 4.7 | 41.51 ± 3.3 | <0.001 |
| EI (kcal) | 1648.1 ± 516.9 | 1582.0 ± 497.7 | 0.245 |
| Carbohydrate (% EI) | 42.0 ± 9.4 | 43.2 ± 9.6 | 0.251 |
| Protein (% EI) | 18.4 ± 4.9 | 17.6 ± 4.5 | 0.131 |
| Fat (% EI) | 39.7 ± 8.5 | 39.2 ± 8.7 | 0.611 |
| EI/weight (kcal/kg) | 45.1 ± 18.0 | 42.1 ± 16.8 | 0.132 |
| Carbohydrate/weight (g/kg) | 4.7 ± 2.0 | 4.5 ± 2.0 | 0.426 |
| Protein/weight (g/kg) | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 0.042 |
| Fat/weight (g/kg) | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 0.9 | 0.140 |
| Underweight (%) | 8.2 | 8.6 | 0.770 |
| Normal weight (%) | 54.1 | 55.7 | |
| Overweight (%) | 30.8 | 26.4 | |
| Obese (%) | 6.8 | 9.2 |
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; FM, fat mass; FMI, fat mass index; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; EI, energy intake. The data are presented as mean ± s.d. a Gender group comparisons were conducted by t-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s χ2 for categorical variables: prevalence of Tanner stage and ponderal status. * All variables have complete data (i.e., n = 320), except for Tanner stage, which was available in 287 participants, 132 boys and 155 girls. Statistically significant values are presented in bold (p ≤ 0.05).
Partial correlation coefficients among cardiorespitatory fitness, body composition variables, and dietary factors, controlling for age and sex.
| WC | FM | FMI | CRF | EI | Carbohydrate | Protein | Fat | EI/Weight | Carbohydrate/Weight | Protein/Weight | Fat/Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | 0.933 ** | 0.915 ** | 0.965 ** | −0.571 ** | −0.096 | −0.036 | 0.119 * | −0.028 | −0.583 ** | −0.552 ** | −0.469 ** | −0.463 ** |
| WC | 0.906 ** | 0.928 ** | −0.574 ** | −0.088 | −0.015 | 0.131 * | −0.056 | −0.582 ** | −0.547 ** | −0.456 ** | −0.470 ** | |
| FM | 0.975 ** | −0.602 ** | −0.179 ** | −0.005 | 0.156 * | −0.081 | −0.604 ** | −0.554 ** | −0.462 ** | −0.504 ** | ||
| FMI | −0.584 ** | −0.136 * | −0.025 | 0.135 * | −0.047 | −0.578 ** | −0.538 ** | −0.454 ** | −0.471 ** | |||
| CRF | 0.045 | 0.064 | −0.048 | −0.043 | 0.319 ** | 0.340 ** | 0.272 ** | 0.214 ** | ||||
| EI | −0.206 ** | −0.207 ** | 0.341 ** | 0.806 ** | 0.625 ** | 0.611 ** | 0.776 ** | |||||
| Carbohydrate | −0.433 ** | −0.871 ** | −0.147 * | 0.368 ** | −0.383 ** | −0.470 ** | ||||||
| Protein | −0.066 | −0.218 ** | −0.405 ** | 0.394 ** | −0.206 ** | |||||||
| Fat | 0.284 ** | −0.185 ** | 0.212 ** | 0.634 ** | ||||||||
| EI/weight | 0.838 ** | 0.781 ** | 0.900 ** | |||||||||
| Carbohydrate/weight | 0.504 ** | 0.545 ** | ||||||||||
| Protein/weight | 0.693 ** |
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; FM, fat mass; FMI, fat mass index; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; EI, energy intake. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
ANCOVA models comparing fat mass percentage by cardiorespiratory fitness categories in children.
| FM (%) | Cardiorespiratory Fitness Categories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | ||
| Model 1 | 31.8 ± 0.6 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | 21.0 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 30.1 ± 0.6 | 25.8 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 30.5 ± 0.6 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | 22.0 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 30.7 ± 0.6 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | 21.7 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Model 5 | 30.6 ± 0.6 | 25.9 ± 0.4 | 21.6 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
The data are presented as marginal estimated mean ± s.e. FM, fat mass. Categories of cardiorespiratory fitness are low (first quartile), medium (second and third quartiles), or high (fourth quartile). Model 1: controlling for age and sex. Model 2: controlling for age, sex, and energy intake/weight. Model 3: controlling for age, sex, and carbohydrate/weight. Model 4: controlling for age, sex, and protein/weight. Model 5: controlling for age, sex, and fat/weight. All of the pairwise mean comparisons using the Bonferroni post-hoc test were statistically significant (low > medium > high, p < 0.05).
ANCOVA models comparing mean differences in fat mass percentage by categories of dietary factors in children.
| Model 1 | Model 6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | |||
| EI/Weight Categories | ||||||||
| FM (%) | 31.2 ± 0.6 | 25.6 ± 0.4 | 20.4 ± 0.6 | <0.001 | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 25.7 ± 0.3 | 21.6 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Carbohydrate/Weight Categories | ||||||||
| FM (%) | 30.2 ± 0.6 | 25.8 ± 0.4 | 20.8 ± 0.6 | <0.001 | 29.0 ± 0.5 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | 22.3 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Protein/Weight Categories | ||||||||
| FM (%) | 29.6 ± 0.6 | 25.5 ± 0.5 | 22.1 ± 0.6 | <0.001 | 28.3 ± 0.5 | 25.6 ± 0.4 | 23.2 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Fat/Weight Categories | ||||||||
| FM (%) | 29.6 ± 0.6 | 26.0 ± 0.4 | 21.1 ± 0.6 | <0.001 | 28.4 ± 0.5 | 26.2 ± 0.4 | 22.0 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
The data are presented as marginal estimated mean ± s.e. EI, energy intake; FM, fat mass. Categories of EI/weight, carbohydrate/weight, protein/weight, and fat/weight are low (first quartile), medium (second and third quartiles), or high (fourth quartile). Model 1: controlling for age and sex. Model 6: controlling for age, sex, and cardiorespiratory fitness. All of the pairwise mean comparisons using the Bonferroni post-hoc test were statistically significant (low > medium > high, p < 0.05).
Figure 1Simple mediation models of the relationship between dietary factors and fat mass, using CRF as a mediator, controlling for age. EI, energy intake; CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; IE, indirect effect; %Med, percentage mediated by fat mass. ** p < 0.001.