Literature DB >> 30520126

Rapid and accurate structure-based therapeutic peptide design using GPU accelerated thermodynamic integration.

Michael Garton1, Carles Corbi-Verge1, Yuan Hu2,3, Satra Nim1, Nadya Tarasova4, Brad Sherborne2, Philip M Kim1,5,6.   

Abstract

Peptide-based therapeutics are an alternative to small molecule drugs as they offer superior specificity, lower toxicity, and easy synthesis. Here we present an approach that leverages the dramatic performance increase afforded by the recent arrival of GPU accelerated thermodynamic integration (TI). GPU TI facilitates very fast, highly accurate binding affinity optimization of peptides against therapeutic targets. We benchmarked TI predictions using published peptide binding optimization studies. Prediction of mutations involving charged side-chains was found to be less accurate than for non-charged, and use of a more complex 3-step TI protocol was found to boost accuracy in these cases. Using the 3-step protocol for non-charged side-chains either had no effect or was detrimental. We use the benchmarked pipeline to optimize a peptide binding to our recently discovered cancer target: EME1. TI calculations predict beneficial mutations using both canonical and non-canonical amino acids. We validate these predictions using fluorescence polarization and confirm that binding affinity is increased. We further demonstrate that this increase translates to a significant reduction in pancreatic cancer cell viability.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EME1; GPU; MUS81; cancer; free energy calculation; peptide therapeutics; thermodynamic integration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30520126      PMCID: PMC8091910          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  35 in total

1.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator.

Authors:  Gavin E Crooks; Gary Hon; John-Marc Chandonia; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

3.  Engineering a protein-protein interface using a computationally designed library.

Authors:  Gurkan Guntas; Carrie Purbeck; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

Authors:  David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions.

Authors:  Maxim V Shapovalov; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Improved Binding Free Energy Predictions from Single-Reference Thermodynamic Integration Augmented with Hamiltonian Replica Exchange.

Authors:  Ilja V Khavrutskii; Anders Wallqvist
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 8.  Targeting p53-MDM2-MDMX loop for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Shelya X Zeng; Hua Lu
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2014

9.  Predicting the effects of basepair mutations in DNA-protein complexes by thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Frank R Beierlein; G Geoff Kneale; Timothy Clark
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Forcefield_NCAA: ab initio charge parameters to aid in the discovery and design of therapeutic proteins and peptides with unnatural amino acids and their application to complement inhibitors of the compstatin family.

Authors:  George A Khoury; James Smadbeck; Phanourios Tamamis; Andrew C Vandris; Chris A Kieslich; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.110

View more
  5 in total

1.  Predicting changes in protein stability caused by mutation using sequence-and structure-based methods in a CAGI5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Alexey Strokach; Carles Corbi-Verge; Philip M Kim
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Protocol for iterative optimization of modified peptides bound to protein targets.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ochoa; Pilar Cossio; Thomas Fox
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.179

3.  Rigorous Computational and Experimental Investigations on MDM2/MDMX-Targeted Linear and Macrocyclic Peptides.

Authors:  David J Diller; Jon Swanson; Alexander S Bayden; Chris J Brown; Dawn Thean; David P Lane; Anthony W Partridge; Tomi K Sawyer; Joseph Audie
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Essential meiotic structure-specific endonuclease1 (EME1) promotes malignant features in gastric cancer cells via the Akt/GSK3B/CCND1 pathway.

Authors:  Zhiguo Guo; Erbo Liang; Wei Li; Leilei Jiang; Fachao Zhi
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 5.  How Computational Chemistry and Drug Delivery Techniques Can Support the Development of New Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Mariangela Garofalo; Giovanni Grazioso; Andrea Cavalli; Jacopo Sgrignani
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.