Christopher J White1, Jeffrey W Bode1. 1. Laboratorium für Organische Chemie, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
The covalent conjugation of large, functionalized molecules remains a frontier in synthetic chemistry, as it requires rapid, chemoselective reactions. The potassium acyltrifluoroborate (KAT)-hydroxylamine amide-forming ligation shows promise for conjugations of biomolecules under aqueous, acidic conditions, but the variants reported to date are not suited to ligations at micromolar concentrations. We now report that 2-pyridyl KATs display significantly enhanced ligation kinetics over their aryl counterparts. Following their facile, one-step incorporation onto the termini of polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains, we show that 2-pyridyl KATs can be applied to the construction of protein-polymer conjugates in excellent (>95%) yield. Four distinct expressed, folded proteins equipped with a hydroxylamine could be PEGylated with 2-20 kDa 2-pyridyl mPEG KATs in high yield and with near-equimolar amounts of coupling partners. Furthermore, the use of a bis 2-pyridyl PEG KAT enables the covalent homodimerization of proteins with good conversion. The 2-pyridyl KAT ligation offers an effective alternative to conventional protein-polymer conjugation by operating under aqueous acidic conditions well suited for the handling of folded proteins.
The covalent conjugation of large, functionalized molecules remains a frontier in synthetic chemistry, as it requires rapid, chemoselective reactions. The potassium acyltrifluoroborate (KAT)-hydroxylamineamide-forming ligation shows promise for conjugations of biomolecules under aqueous, acidic conditions, but the variants reported to date are not suited to ligations at micromolar concentrations. We now report that 2-pyridyl KATs display significantly enhanced ligation kinetics over their aryl counterparts. Following their facile, one-step incorporation onto the termini of polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains, we show that 2-pyridyl KATs can be applied to the construction of protein-polymer conjugates in excellent (>95%) yield. Four distinct expressed, folded proteins equipped with a hydroxylamine could be PEGylated with 2-20 kDa 2-pyridyl mPEGKATs in high yield and with near-equimolar amounts of coupling partners. Furthermore, the use of a bis 2-pyridyl PEGKAT enables the covalent homodimerization of proteins with good conversion. The 2-pyridyl KAT ligation offers an effective alternative to conventional protein-polymer conjugation by operating under aqueous acidic conditions well suited for the handling of folded proteins.
Chemical methods for the conjugation of
large molecules (>10,000 MW), including polymers to proteins, present
a continuing challenge in organic synthesis.[1,2] As
noted by many researchers, the union of large molecules with near
stoichiometric amounts of coupling partners poses a particular problem
for organic chemistry, as it requires not only chemoselective reactions
but also very fast second order kinetics.[3−5] This constraint
arises from the difficulty in obtaining concentrated solutions of
larger molecules, due to their high molecular mass and limited solubility.
While most organic reactions operate optimally at around 200 mM, even
small proteins are often soluble only at 20 μM or less: a 10,000-fold
difference in concentration between small molecule and protein conjugation
chemistry.As part of our efforts to develop new, chemoselective
amide-forming ligations for the conjugation of large molecules, we
now document the successful application of the potassium acyltrifluoroborate[6−8] (KAT) ligation[9,10] to protein PEGylation and dimerization
at near equimolar stoichiometry. Key to the success of this project
was the identification of 2-pyridyl KAT reagents,[11] which display enhanced reaction rates[11] and are easily introduced onto commercial PEG reagents.
These studies establish the KAT ligation as suitable for the conjugation
of PEG–KATs to proteins bearing a hydroxylamine within hours
at micromolar concentrations, without any nonspecific reactions or
interactions. Notably, this process proceeds with folded proteins
under aqueous, acidic conditions that complement the neutral or basic
conditions typically employed for protein PEGylation.
Experimental
Design
Background
Very few chemoselective, intermolecular
reactions are fast enough to conduct site-specific protein–polymer
conjugations with near equimolar amounts of reagents. The most successful
and widely used chemistry for this “grafting to” approach[12,13] is the venerable addition of thiols[14]—usually in the form of cysteine side chains—to polymers
bearing maleimide groups. A majority of commercially approved PEGylated
therapeutic proteins[15,16] and antibody–drug conjugates[17,18] have been prepared using this chemistry. Its widespread use stems
from its exceptionally fast reaction rate,[5] making it well-suited for protein modification. However, its limitations
include the reversibility of the conjugate addition,[19] the formation of stereoisomers, and hydrolysis of the succinimide
ring to give regioisomeric products.[20,21] Other “grafting
to”[22,23] approaches to site-specific protein–PEGylation
include the development of specialized PEG reagents that readily participate
in other bioorthogonal reactions, such as oxime ligations, copper-catalyzed
azide alkyne cycloadditions (CuAAC), strain-promoted azide alkyne
cycloadditions (SPAAC), palladium-catalyzed cross couplings, Staudinger-phosphite
ligations, and tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligations.[24]Although not directly applicable to PEGylation,
“grafting from”[25] methods
for the preparation of protein–polymer conjugates have recently
emerged as an alternative approach. These processes typically begin
with the introduction of a radical initiator onto a protein side chain
followed by RAFT or ATRP with olefin monomers. However, limitations
of these methods include the use of additional initiator reagents,
the requirement for thoroughly deoxygenated solvents/buffers, and
the formation of hetereogeneous polymer dispersities.[26]
Implementation
At the outset of
our own studies, we focused on the specific problem of identifying
reaction conditions and PEG-KAT reagents suitable for conjugation
to a single hydroxylamine on a protein. Our primary goal was to execute
the KAT-mediated PEGylation of folded proteins under near stoichiometric
reaction conditions. Provided these studies were successful, we also
sought to apply this chemistry to protein dimerization, as the requisite
multivalent PEG-KATs are easily prepared in one step.[10,27]We envisioned four approaches to incorporating a hydroxylamine
into a target protein: (1) chemical modification[28−30] of a pre-existing
side chain, such as a solvent exposed cysteine residue;[31,32] (2) protein expression with unnatural amino acids,[33−36] such as pyrrolysine surrogates;[37] (3)
site-specific modification (i.e., oxidation or acylation) of an N-terminal residue[38] or an internal
lysine residue;[39] or (4) chemical protein
synthesis with a preinstalled hydroxylamine side chain.[10] Preliminary results showed all of these approaches
to hydroxylamine incorporation to be possible, but this step will
be relevant only if the PEGylation or other conjugation onto the protein
hydroxylamine confers advantages over other strategies. We elected
to adopt established approaches of cysteine modification to generate
protein hydroxylamines for the initial conjugation studies, although
our long-term efforts favor other methods. Related site-specific modification[40−42] of other side chains, including tyrosine,[43−48] tryptophan,[49] and methionine,[50] is becoming increasingly common, and one could
easily imagine preparing suitable reagents for incorporating hydroxylamines
at these sites.
Experimental Results
Preparation of Protein
Hydroxylamines
As a model protein for initial studies, we
selected a mutant (S147C) of superfolder green fluorescent protein
(sfGFP),[51] bearing a single accessible
thiol that has been shown to react selectively[52] with various thiophilic reagents.[53] This S147C mutant was readily expressed from Escherichia
coli host DH10B and isolated in high purity following sequential
Ni-affinity and anion exchange chromatography purifications. We initially
prepared a hydroxylamine–malemide reagent for protein modification,
and successfully used this reagent for protein PEGylation, but found
that the studies were complicated by byproducts and retroadditions.
The inherent two-step nature of our approach allowed us to consider
more stable cysteine adducts. We selected methylsulfonephenyl-oxadiazoles,
which have been shown by Barbas and co-workers to react chemoselectively
with cysteine residues in proteins.[54,55] The resulting
adducts possess appreciable serum stability and are resistant to both
hydrolysis and trans-thioetherification. Bifunctional methylsulfonephenyl-oxadiazole–hydroxylamine 4 was prepared in 3 steps from N-Boc protected
3-bromopropyl-O-carbamoyl hydroxylamine 2 (Scheme A).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of (A) Bifunctional Reagent 4 and (B) Its
Site-Selective Labeling of sfGFP-(S147C)
Reagents
and conditions: (a) 1 (1.0 equiv), 2 (1.1
equiv), K2CO3 (1.1 equiv), DMF, 18 h, 23 °C
(94%). (b) mCPBA (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 18 h, 0 to 23 °C. (c) TFA:CH2Cl2 (1:2.3), 5 h, 0 °C (63% over 2 steps). (d) 5 (1.3
mg/mL, 50 μM), 4 (10 equiv), 0.1 M K-Phos pH 7.8,
2 h, 0 °C. Boc = tert-butoxycarbonyl, mCPBA = meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, TFA
= trifluoroacetic acid, DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide.
Synthesis of (A) Bifunctional Reagent 4 and (B) Its
Site-Selective Labeling of sfGFP-(S147C)
Reagents
and conditions: (a) 1 (1.0 equiv), 2 (1.1
equiv), K2CO3 (1.1 equiv), DMF, 18 h, 23 °C
(94%). (b) mCPBA (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 18 h, 0 to 23 °C. (c) TFA:CH2Cl2 (1:2.3), 5 h, 0 °C (63% over 2 steps). (d) 5 (1.3
mg/mL, 50 μM), 4 (10 equiv), 0.1 M K-Phos pH 7.8,
2 h, 0 °C. Boc = tert-butoxycarbonyl, mCPBA = meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, TFA
= trifluoroacetic acid, DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide.To introduce hydroxylamine 4 onto sfGFP-(S147C) 5, we pretreated 5 with DTT to reduce any disulfide homodimers. After removal of excess
DTT, 5 was alkylated with 10 equiv of 4 in
a potassium phosphate (K-Phos) buffer at pH 7.8. Characterization
by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) showed full
conversion to the hydroxylamine-tagged bioconjugate 6 (Scheme B). Excess 4 was conveniently removed by spin diafiltration, and the
modified protein was stable to storage for several days at room temperature
in a variety of buffers, including phosphate, HEPES, Tris, and glycine.
Protein PEGylation with PEG-KAT Reagents
We have previously
reported the synthesis of 10 kDa, methyl-capped PEG chain (mPEG) p-phenyl KAT 7(10) and its application in peptide PEGylation, albeit at a concentration
of 1 mM. We utilized this reagent for our initial attempts at protein
PEGylation, with the anticipation that the PEGylated product 8 should be readily separable—and therefore quantifiable—from
unreacted protein hydroxylamine 6 by both SDS polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and fast protein liquid chromatography
(FPLC).[56,57] When 6 was treated with an
excess of the 10 kDa KAT reagent 7 (4.0 equiv) at 25
μM in a K-Phos buffer[58] at pH 6.0,
we observed very poor ligation efficiency[59] (8%) after 12 h, with little conversion to the desired PEGylated
product 8. Increasing the amount of 7 to
10 equiv and the reaction time to 24 h resulted in only a slight improvement
(Table , entries 2
and 3). In order to improve the ligation efficiency, we sought to
use a lower pH that should still be suitable for most folded proteins.
Glycine (Gly) is a common bulking agent used in the formulation of
therapeutic proteins, has been shown to effectively stabilize folded
proteins via the preferential exclusion mechanism,[60,61] and is recognized as a solubilizing agent for proteins under acidic
conditions (effective pH range: 2.2–3.6).[62] We initially had some concern about the combination of
KAT reagents and a large excess of Gly, as they can undergo imine
formation.[63] However, upon performing the
ligation of 6 with 4.0 equiv of 7 in a Gly-HCl
buffer at pH 3.6,[64,65] we observed an increase in ligation
efficiency (61%) after 12 h (Table , entry 4).
Table 1
Screening and Optimization of Reaction Conditions
for the PEGylation of sfGFP-(S147C) with 10 kDa mPEG-KATs 7 and 9ca
entry
X
KAT equiv
bufferb
pH
concn (μM)
time
(h)
ligation efficc (%)
1
CH
4.0
K-Phos
6.0
25
12
8
2
CH
10
K-Phos
6.0
25
12
17
3
CH
10
K-Phos
6.0
25
24
35
4
CH
4.0
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
12
61
5
N
4.0
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
0.5
89
6
N
4.0
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
1.0
97
7
N
1.5
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
12
96
8
N
1.5
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
1.0
75
9
N
1.5
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
5.0
96
10
N
1.5
citrate
3.6
25
1.0
57
11
N
1.5
citrate
3.6
25
12
92
12
N
4.0
K-Phos
6.0
25
1.0
17
13
N
4.0
K-Phos
6.0
25
12
78
14
N
4.0
histidine
3.6
25
12
65
15
N
4.0
Gly-HCl
3.6
5.0
12
97
16
N
1.5
Gly-HCl
3.6
5.0
12
74
17
N
1.1
Gly-HCl
3.6
25
12
90
Ligations were performed at 23 °C.
Buffers were formulated to
a concentration of 50 mM and contained 50 mM KF along with DMF (5%
by volume).
Ligation efficiencies
were estimated from the FPLC traces as a ratio of the peak area of
the PEGylated product over areas of all peaks at 490 nm.
Ligations were performed at 23 °C.Buffers were formulated to
a concentration of 50 mM and contained 50 mM KF along with DMF (5%
by volume).Ligation efficiencies
were estimated from the FPLC traces as a ratio of the peak area of
the PEGylated product over areas of all peaks at 490 nm.Although encouraging, these results
were still far from ideal, especially with the goal of carrying out
protein dimerization or PEGylation with near equimolar amounts of
coupling partners. Earlier work from our group identified alternative
acyl boronates that display faster ligation kinetics at higher pH.[66] Unfortunately, these reagents—such as
acyl MIDA compounds[67]—are unstable
in aqueous environments and are not suitable for equimolar reaction
conditions. Parallel studies have identified marked substrate effects
in the KAT ligation, with 2-pyridyl KATs emerging as significantly
faster ligation partners at both lower and higher pH.[11] To take advantage of this finding, we required the corresponding
2-pyridyl mPEG-KAT reagent 9, which was synthesized in
good yield by a nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAR)
reaction of mPEG 10 with an excess of 5-fluoropyridin-2-yl
KAT 11 (Scheme ). The same procedure was used to prepare 2-pyridyl mPEG-KATs
in varying size (9a–d) and valency
(12) from the corresponding mPEG or PEG diol 10.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 2-Pyridyl mPEG-KATs 9a–d and Bis 2-Pyridyl PEG KAT 12
Reagents and conditions: 10 (1.0 equiv), 11 (3.0 equiv for 9, 6.0 equiv for 12), NaH (2.0 equiv for 9, 4.0 equiv for 12), DMF, 12 h, 23 °C.
Synthesis of 2-Pyridyl mPEG-KATs 9a–d and Bis 2-Pyridyl PEG KAT 12
Reagents and conditions: 10 (1.0 equiv), 11 (3.0 equiv for 9, 6.0 equiv for 12), NaH (2.0 equiv for 9, 4.0 equiv for 12), DMF, 12 h, 23 °C.With 9c in hand, we revisited the 10
kDa PEGylation of 6. Upon treatment with 4.0 equiv of 9c in a Gly-HCl buffer at pH 3.6, we observed exceptional
ligation efficiency (89%) after only 30 min and essentially full conversion
to 13c after 1.0 h; no unreacted protein was detected
by FPLC (Table , entries
5 and 6). We could also use lower ratios of coupling partners 6 and 9c: with only 1.5 equiv of 9c we observed 75% conversion within 1 h (entry 8) and essentially
full conversion to 13c after 5 h (Table , entry 9). Using 4.0 equiv of 9c, we could raise the pH to 6.0 in a K-Phos buffer. Although the ligation
was not complete after 1 h (17%, entry 12), good conversion was obtained
after 12 h (78%, entry 13). These observations are consistent with
a second order rate constant k2 of 14
M–1 s–1 at pH 3.6 and 0.50 M–1 s–1 at pH 6.0. To put this into
context, other relevant bioorthogonal click reactions with comparable
rates include strain-promoted 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of azides
with biarylazacyclooctynones (k = 0.9–1.6
M–1 s–1),[68] 1,2-aminothiol-2-cyanobenzothiazole ligations (k2 = 2.7–59.7 M–1 s–1),[69] the hydrazino-Pictet Spengler ligation
(k2 = 1–40 M–1 s–1),[70] strain-promoted
alkyne–nitrone cycloadditions (SPANCs) (k2 = 1.5–39 M–1 s–1),[71,72] and the inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder
reaction of tetrazines with norbornenes (k2 = 0.12–8.0 M–1 s–1).[73]To further evaluate the effect of the
reaction medium on the ligation efficiency, we tested citrate as an
alternative buffer under otherwise identical conditions (pH 3.6, 25
μM protein concentration). This system gave slightly lower,
but still overall good, conversions (Table , entries 10 and 11). This suggests that
Gly may help overcome some nonspecific interactions between the PEGKAT and lysine side chains. In contrast, when the PEGylation of 6 with 9c was carried out in a histidine buffer
at pH 6.0, a diminished conversion to 13c was observed
in comparison to the same reaction carried out in K-Phos buffer (Table , entry 14). These
results suggest that, at higher pH ranges, amino acid based buffers
may be detrimental to the efficiency of KAT ligations, possibly due
to substrate deactivation through reversible imine condensations.Utilizing our optimized conditions, we tested the ligation of 6 and 9c at higher dilution and were pleased
to observe essentially full conversion to 13c with 4.0
equiv of 9c at a concentration of 5 μM, and a 74%
ligation efficiency with 1.5 equiv of 9c after 12 h (Table , entries 15 and 16).
When only 1.1 equiv of 9c was employed, we could still
observe an impressive conversion to 13c (90%) under our
optimized conditions (Table , entry 17).
Protein PEGylation with Various KAT Reagents
We investigated the conjugation of sfGFP-(S147C) with PEG chains
of varying size including 2, 5, and 20 kDa mPEG (see Scheme for syntheses). We selected
two of our optimal conditions for these experiments: condition A,
4.0 equiv of mPEGKAT 9, 1.0 h reaction time (Table , entry 6), and condition
B, 1.5 equiv of 9, 5.0 h reaction time (Table , entry 9). The 2-pyridyl mPEGKATs 9a–d were applied to the PEGylation
of 6 under both conditions, which were analyzed by FPLC
and SDS–PAGE (Scheme ). Exposure of 6 to our 2, 5, 10, and 20 kDa
2-pyridyl mPEGKATs 9a–d under conditions
A and B (25 μM) gave, in all eight cases, excellent conversions
(>90%) to the corresponding monoPEGylated conjugates 13a–d. Upon purification, the identities of 13a–d were verified by matrix-assisted
laser desorption–ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass
spectrometry.
Scheme 3
Site-Specific MonoPEGylation of sfGFP-(S147C) with
2–20 kDa 2-Pyridyl mPEG KATs
Conditions: 6 (1.3 mg/mL, 25 μM), 50 mM Gly-HCl, 50 mM KF, DMF (5%),
pH 3.6, 23 °C. Condition A: 9a–d (4.0 equiv) 1.0 h. Condition B: 9a–d (1.5 equiv), 5.0 h. SDS–PAGE traces are shown for each reaction,
with the unpurified reactions for each condition and mPEG used shown
on the left and the purified products shown on the right.
Conversions were calculated by
gel densitometric analysis.
Ligation efficiencies were estimated from the crude FPLC chromatograms
though peak integration fractionations at 490 nm.
Site-Specific MonoPEGylation of sfGFP-(S147C) with
2–20 kDa 2-Pyridyl mPEG KATs
Conditions: 6 (1.3 mg/mL, 25 μM), 50 mM Gly-HCl, 50 mM KF, DMF (5%),
pH 3.6, 23 °C. Condition A: 9a–d (4.0 equiv) 1.0 h. Condition B: 9a–d (1.5 equiv), 5.0 h. SDS–PAGE traces are shown for each reaction,
with the unpurified reactions for each condition and mPEG used shown
on the left and the purified products shown on the right.Conversions were calculated by
gel densitometric analysis.Ligation efficiencies were estimated from the crude FPLC chromatograms
though peak integration fractionations at 490 nm.
PEGylation of Other Protein Targets
To test the generality
of the PEGylation, we selected three other protein targets that could
be equipped with a hydroxylamine using bifunctional reagent 4. The ubiquitin-conjugating protein Ubc9 is involved in the
conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) onto various proteins
through their lysine residues.[74] This 20
kDa E2 ligase contains 4 cysteine residues, one of which, Cys93, is
involved in the enzyme’s active site enabling SUMOylation through
a glycyl thioester intermediate. As part of an unrelated project,
we expressed a C93A mutant. Examination of the crystal structure revealed
that Cys43 and Cys75 were buried within the folded protein, leaving
a single, solvent-accessible cysteine (Cys138).[75] Expressed Ubc9-(C93A) was treated with 4 in
K-Phos buffer (10 equiv, pH 7.8); after 2.0 h we observed quantitative
conversion by ESI-MS to give O-carbamoyl hydroxylamine
functionalized bioconjugate 14. Exposure of 14 to both our 10 and 20 kDa 2-pyridyl mPEGKATs 9c-d under the optimized conditions A and B (25 μM) gave,
in all four cases, excellent conversions (>90%) to the corresponding
monoPEGylated bioconjugates 15c-d as determined
by SDS–PAGE (Scheme a). Upon purification by cation exchange chromatography, the
identities of 15c-d were verified by MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry.
Scheme 4
Site-Specific MonoPEGylations of Additional Protein
Substrates
Ligations were carried out in a
50 mM Gly-HCl pH 3.6 buffer with 50 mM KF and DMF (5%) at 23 °C.
Conversions were calculated
by gel densitometric analysis. (a) 10 and 20 kDa PEGylation of Ubc9-(C93A).
(b) 10 and 20 kDa PEGylation of T4L-(V131C). Condition A: 9c-d (4.0 equiv) 1.0 h. Condition B: 9c-d (1.5 equiv), 5.0 h. (c) 5.0 kDa PEGylation of HTP-(S261C)
at 10 μM. Lane 1: HTP-(S261C). Lanes 2–5: unpurified reactions
after 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0 h, respectively. SDS–PAGE traces
are shown for each reaction with the unpurified reactions for each
condition and mPEG used shown on the left and the purified products
shown on the right for (a) and (b).
Site-Specific MonoPEGylations of Additional Protein
Substrates
Ligations were carried out in a
50 mM Gly-HCl pH 3.6 buffer with 50 mM KF and DMF (5%) at 23 °C.Conversions were calculated
by gel densitometric analysis. (a) 10 and 20 kDa PEGylation of Ubc9-(C93A).
(b) 10 and 20 kDa PEGylation of T4L-(V131C). Condition A: 9c-d (4.0 equiv) 1.0 h. Condition B: 9c-d (1.5 equiv), 5.0 h. (c) 5.0 kDa PEGylation of HTP-(S261C)
at 10 μM. Lane 1: HTP-(S261C). Lanes 2–5: unpurified reactions
after 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0 h, respectively. SDS–PAGE traces
are shown for each reaction with the unpurified reactions for each
condition and mPEG used shown on the left and the purified products
shown on the right for (a) and (b).The previously
reported V131C mutant of T4 lysozyme (T4L)[76] contains a single, solvent-exposed cysteine residue that has been
shown to readily react with both small molecules[77] and polymeric reagents[78] bearing
maleimide end groups. The mutant T4L-(V131C) was obtained following
subcloning of the gene encoding the mutant protein into a pET 28b-(+)
vector, expression from E. coli host BL21 (DE3),
and purification by cation exchange chromatography. T4L-(V131C) was
incubated with 4 (10 equiv, pH 6.5) to quantitatively
yield the O-carbamoyl hydroxylamine bioconjugate 16. This adduct was treated with 9c-d under the optimized conditions A and B. In all four cases, we were
pleased to observe near quantitative conversions (>96%) to the
corresponding monoPEGylated bioconjugates 17c-d by SDS–PAGE (Scheme b). Upon purification by cation exchange chromatography, the
identities of 17c-d were verified by MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry.As a fourth protein target, we expressed
a mutant of the 48 kDa enzyme human thymidine phosphorylase (HTP).
HTP plays a primary catabolic role in the metabolism of pyrimidine
nucleosides,[79] and its overexpression and
elevated activity have been found in the plasma of cancerpatients[80] and in solid tumors linked to poor prognosis.[81] Through site-directed mutagenesis, an S261C
mutation was found to create a single, solvent exposed Cys residue
that readily reacts with thiophilic electrophiles. Following transformation
of a pYSBLIC plasmid encoding the gene for the mutant into Rosetta-(DE3)-pLysS, HTP-(S261C) was expressed[82] and purified
through sequential Ni-affinity and anion exchange chromatography.
HTP-(S261C) was treated with 4 (10 equiv, pH 7.8) to yield
the corresponding O-carbamoyl hydroxylamine conjugate 18, quantitatively by ESI-MS. Upon treatment of 18 with the 5.0 kDa 2-pyridyl mPEGKAT reagent 9b (4.0
equiv) under significantly dilute conditions (10 μM) in a Gly-HCl
pH 3.6 buffer, we were pleased to observe formation of the corresponding
monoPEGylated bioconjugate 19b in 82% conversion by SDS–PAGE[83] (Scheme c).
Protein Dimerization
A particularly
challenging area of chemical protein modification is the formation
of homo- and heterodimeric proteins. Protein dimerization is ubiquitous
in biology and plays a vital role in signal transduction, gene expression,
and enzymatic regulation.[84,85] The ability to control
this phenomenon has widespread applications in various fields of research
by enabling the manipulation of physical structure and regulatory
function in organisms.[86,87] Dimerization creates avidity,
resulting in a higher local concentration, and often in greater biological
activities as compared to the corresponding monomeric protein.[88] There are few synthetic methods for the effective
construction of dimeric protein–protein conjugates, and fast,
site-specific technologies are imperative to their chemical synthesis.
Significant advances in this area include the works of Maynard,[89,90] Francis,[91] Bertozzi, Nogales and Rabuka,[92] Kluger,[93] and Thordarson.[94]Based on the outstanding results of protein
PEGylation with KAT reagents under near stoichiometric conditions,
we envisioned that a KAT-mediated homodimerization of a protein could
be realized, utilizing one equivalent of a bis 2-pyridyl PEGKAT linker
and two or more equivalents of protein hydroxylamine. The linker should
be of sufficient length as to avoid steric and electrostatic clashes.[94] We prepared a 3.4 kDa bis 2-pyridyl PEGKAT 12 in an analogous fashion to our 2-pyridyl mPEGKAT reagents 9a–d (Scheme ).We initially investigated the homodimerization
of T4L-(V131C) with linker 12. One equivalent of 12 was treated with 2.0 equiv of freshly prepared O-carbamoyl hydroxylamine-tagged T4L 16 in
a Gly-HCl buffer at pH 3.6 (Scheme a). After 30 min at a protein concentration of 50 μM,
we observed the formation of two new higher molecular weight bands
by SDS–PAGE (Scheme a, lane 2), which we attributed to monoligated T4L-PEG intermediate
(middle) and homodimer 20 (upper), with the latter being
formed in 52% conversion by gel densitometric analysis. By increasing
the reaction time to 5 h, we observed that 20 was formed
in 72% conversion (Scheme a, lane 4); prolonging the reaction time to 24 h showed no
significant increase in conversion (not shown). By increasing the
reaction concentration to 100 μM we could further improve the
conversion to 82% (Scheme a, lane 5). Through a combination of sequential size exclusion
and cation exchange chromatography, homodimer 20 was
purified and its identity was verified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
(Scheme a, lower right).
Scheme 5
Homodimerization of (a) T4L-(V131C) and (b) sfGFP-(S147C) with Bis
2-Pyridyl PEG KAT 12
Reactions
were carried out at 23 °C.
Concentrations (μM) of each reaction are given with respect
to 16 or 6.
Conversions were calculated by gel densitometric analysis.
(a) T4L-(V131C) dimerization. Lane 1: T4L-(V131C). Lanes 2–4:
unpurified reactions after 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 h, respectively, at a
concentration of 50 μM. Lane 5: unpurified reaction after 5.0
h at a concentration of 100 μM. Lane 6: purified 20. Lower right: MALDI-TOF spectrum of 20. (b) sfGFP-(S147C) dimerization. Lane 1: sfGFP-(S147C). Lanes 2–4: unpurified reactions
after 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 h, respectively, at a concentration of 50
μM. Lane 5: unpurified reaction after 5.0 h at a concentration
of 100 μM.
Homodimerization of (a) T4L-(V131C) and (b) sfGFP-(S147C) with Bis
2-Pyridyl PEG KAT 12
Reactions
were carried out at 23 °C.Concentrations (μM) of each reaction are given with respect
to 16 or 6.Conversions were calculated by gel densitometric analysis.
(a) T4L-(V131C) dimerization. Lane 1: T4L-(V131C). Lanes 2–4:
unpurified reactions after 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 h, respectively, at a
concentration of 50 μM. Lane 5: unpurified reaction after 5.0
h at a concentration of 100 μM. Lane 6: purified 20. Lower right: MALDI-TOF spectrum of 20. (b) sfGFP-(S147C) dimerization. Lane 1: sfGFP-(S147C). Lanes 2–4: unpurified reactions
after 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 h, respectively, at a concentration of 50
μM. Lane 5: unpurified reaction after 5.0 h at a concentration
of 100 μM.Following our success with
the homodimerization of T4L-(V131C), we investigated the dimerization
of sfGFP-(S147C) with linker 12. Under identical conditions
for the T4L dimerization, 1.0 equiv of 12 was treated
with 2.0 equiv of freshly prepared 6 in a Gly-HCl buffer
at pH 3.6. After only 30 min at a protein concentration of 50 μM,
we were pleased to observe a conversion of approximately 48% to the
corresponding homodimer 21 (Scheme b, lane 2). Again, by increasing the reaction
time to 5.0 h and the protein concentration to 100 μM, we could
push the conversion to 21 up to 72% (Scheme b, lane 5).
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that the KAT ligation can be readily applied
to protein conjugation under dilute, near-equimolar conditions. Through
a two-step protocol, we have achieved PEGylation and covalent homodimerization
of various recombinant proteins. Our success with 2-pyridyl KATs should
lead to the discovery of ligation partners with even further enhanced
ligation kinetics and ultimately to chimeric fusion architectures
through the development of novel multifunctional linkers that will
facilitate the covalent, selective dimerization or multimerization
of different biomolecules.
Authors: Milan Vrabel; Patrick Kölle; Korbinian M Brunner; Michael J Gattner; Verónica López-Carrillo; Regina de Vivie-Riedle; Thomas Carell Journal: Chemistry Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Ross J Taylor; Mauricio Aguilar Rangel; Michael B Geeson; Pietro Sormanni; Michele Vendruscolo; Gonçalo J L Bernardes Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 16.383
Authors: Hayden R Montgomery; Marco S Messina; Evan A Doud; Alexander M Spokoyny; Heather D Maynard Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 6.069