Literature DB >> 22095664

Bromomaleimide-linked bioconjugates are cleavable in mammalian cells.

Paul Moody1, Mark E B Smith, Chris P Ryan, Vijay Chudasama, James R Baker, Justin Molloy, Stephen Caddick.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22095664      PMCID: PMC3320661          DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201100603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chembiochem        ISSN: 1439-4227            Impact factor:   3.164


× No keyword cloud information.
Bromomaleimides have recently been shown to act as small, versatile scaffolds for the controlled assembly of thiolated biomolecules.[1-4] They present three points of chemical attachment, thereby allowing the modular construction of multifunctional bioconjugates. The bromomaleimide scaffold introduces no new chiral centres to the final construct and, in contrast to disulfide linkages, bromomaleimides can be used to link two unactivated biomolecules of equal concentration with minimal formation of homodimeric side products.2 Bromomaleimide adducts have been shown to dissociate in vitro in the presence of reducing agents to liberate the composite thiols.2 The cytoplasm of cells contains 1–10 mm reduced glutathione,5 thus raising the possibility that bromomaleimide conjugates could be cleavable in vivo. If this could be demonstrated, then a number of medical and academic applications can be envisaged that combine in vivo cleavage with multiple points of scaffold attachment. However, a number of factors might inhibit cytoplasmic cleavage, in particular pH-dependant3 and protease-catalysed amide bond hydrolysis. Using a series of bromomaleimide-linked green fluorescent protein (GFP)–rhodamine conjugates, designed as FRET pairs, we demonstrate herein that bromomaleimide-linked bioconjugates cleave in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Rhodamine–maleimide derivatives 4–6 were generated by condensation of the relevant maleic anhydride with a common intermediate, 3 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1

Synthesis of rhodamine-bromomaleimides. a) (COCl)2, 20 °C, 15 h; b) piperidin-4-yl carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (10.4 equiv), CsCO3 (10.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 20 °C, 24 h, 71 % (2 steps); c) TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 20 °C, 5 h, 100 %; d) maleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 40 %; e) bromomaleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 66 %; f) dibromomaleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 66 %.

Synthesis of rhodamine-bromomaleimides. a) (COCl)2, 20 °C, 15 h; b) piperidin-4-yl carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (10.4 equiv), CsCO3 (10.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 20 °C, 24 h, 71 % (2 steps); c) TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 20 °C, 5 h, 100 %; d) maleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 40 %; e) bromomaleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 66 %; f) dibromomaleic anhydride (1.4 equiv), AcOH, 120 °C, 5 h, 66 %. The two native cysteines in wild-type superfolder GFP,6 C48 and C70, were shown to be inaccessible to maleimide functionalisation under our reaction conditions (see Section 4 in the Supporting Information). A GFP with a free, accessible thiol close to its fluorophore (GFP-SH) was generated by introducing an S147C mutation into superfolder GFP. The mutated GFP-SH produces a similar emission spectrum to wild-type superfolder GFP. The folded protein was shown to be resistant to disulfide-mediated dimerisation, thus allowing GFP-SH to be conjugated to maleimides without the need for reducing agents (see Section 5 in the Supporting Information). Compounds 4–6 were attached to GFP-SH as described in the Supporting Information, Section 5. Stoichiometric addition of rhodamine–maleimide was confirmed by mass spectrometry. The emission spectra of the resultant constructs 7–10 are illustrated in Figure 1. In each case, addition of rhodamine–maleimide was shown to result in efficient quenching of GFP fluorescence. Little increase in emission at 590 nm was seen.
Figure 1

Emission spectra of superfolder GFP, the mutant GFP-SH and the rhodamine conjugates; compounds 7–9 (0.85 μM), compound 10 (0.425 μM; λex=494 nm).

Emission spectra of superfolder GFP, the mutant GFP-SH and the rhodamine conjugates; compounds 7–9 (0.85 μM), compound 10 (0.425 μM; λex=494 nm). Cleavage of compounds 7–10 by a physiologically relevant concentration of reduced glutathione (1 mM) was monitored in vitro by dual-channel measurement of the GFP and rhodamine emission intensities upon excitation of GFP at 494 nm (Figure 2).
Figure 2

In vitro cleavage of the rhodamine–GFP conjugates. Glutathione (1 mM) was added to compounds A) 7, B) 8, C) 9 (0.85 μM each) and D) 10 (0.43 μM). GFP was excited at 494 nm; GFP emission (515 nm, green) and rhodamine emission (590 nm, red) were measured simultaneously.

In vitro cleavage of the rhodamine–GFP conjugates. Glutathione (1 mM) was added to compounds A) 7, B) 8, C) 9 (0.85 μM each) and D) 10 (0.43 μM). GFP was excited at 494 nm; GFP emission (515 nm, green) and rhodamine emission (590 nm, red) were measured simultaneously. As expected, the GFP emission intensity associated with 7 did not change upon addition of glutathione, whereas that associated with 8–10 increased. The data fitted well to a single exponential increase in free GFP concentration over time, suggesting first-order kinetics with respect to conjugates 8–10 under these conditions. Rate constants of 1.9 s−1 for 8, 26 s−1 for 9 and 2.8 s−1 for 10 were calculated. For compounds 7–9, little change in apparent rhodamine emission (590 nm) was seen during the experiments. For compound 10, a decrease in rhodamine emission was observed; this suggesting that FRET is disrupted. The efficient quenching of GFP fluorescence allowed us to use the ratio of GFP/rhodamine emission intensities as a quantitative measure of cleavage during subsequent microinjection experiments. Cleavage of constructs 8–10 was also confirmed by mass spectrometry under analogous reaction conditions (see Section 7 in the Supporting Information). Cleavage of constructs 8–10 in human cells was demonstrated by microinjection into live, cultured HeLa cells, followed by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. GFP was excited by using a 450–490 nm filter, and GFP and rhodamine emission were measured simultaneously by using an image splitter that contained GFP (500–550 nm) and rhodamine (575–630 nm) emission filters (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3

In-cell cleavage of compound 9 following microinjection into HeLa cells. The image was cast onto the upper and lower halves of the CCD sensor by using an image splitter (Optical Insights). Top: GFP emission, bottom: rhodamine emission. A) DIC image immediately before injection. B) Fluorescence image immediately after injection. C) Fluorescence image 10 min after cleavage. Scale bars=5.0 μm.

Figure 4

In-cell cleavage of compounds 7–10 in HeLa cells. The GFP/rhodamine emission ratio and exponential fits were calculated as described in the Supporting Information.

In-cell cleavage of compound 9 following microinjection into HeLa cells. The image was cast onto the upper and lower halves of the CCD sensor by using an image splitter (Optical Insights). Top: GFP emission, bottom: rhodamine emission. A) DIC image immediately before injection. B) Fluorescence image immediately after injection. C) Fluorescence image 10 min after cleavage. Scale bars=5.0 μm. In-cell cleavage of compounds 7–10 in HeLa cells. The GFP/rhodamine emission ratio and exponential fits were calculated as described in the Supporting Information. In each case, both the absolute GFP intensity post-microinjection (see Section 8 in the Supporting Information) and ratiometric data fitted well to a single exponential increase, thus showing that bromomaleimide-linked constructs are cleaved in cells. The order of reactivity is the same as that observed in vitro (see Section 9 in the Supporting Information); this suggests that the mechanism of cleavage in cells is the same as the mechanism in vitro. The ratio of GFP/rhodamine emission intensity at equilibrium is consistent with the ratio observed for cleaved constructs deposited directly onto glass slides (see Section 10 in the Supporting Information). This suggests that complete cleavage of the bromomaleimide linkages occurs in HeLa cells. Disassembly of the fully conjugated dibromomaleimide (10) was also successfully demonstrated in COS-7 cells (see Section 8 in the Supporting Information), thus highlighting that observed in cell cleavage is not restricted to HeLa cells. In summary, we have demonstrated that bromomaleimide-linked conjugates can be cleaved with first-order kinetics both in vitro and in cells. Dibromomaleimide derivatives (9 and 10) cleave at a faster rate than monobromomaleimide construct 8. Maleimide construct 7 is stable to thiol-promoted cleavage. We envisage that bromomaleimides have potential as scaffolds for the synthesis of a variety of multifunctional reagents. We believe that the FRET construct 9 has a specific application in the screening of attached thiolated cell-penetrating structures capable of successfully delivering protein cargo to the cytoplasm. More broadly, we believe that bromomaleimide scaffolds provide a potential core structure for the facile and versatile construction of targeted therapeutics that will cleave to release their cargo once internalised into the cytoplasm. We shall report on the further development and application of this methodology in due course.
  6 in total

1.  Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Jean-Denis Pédelacq; Stéphanie Cabantous; Timothy Tran; Thomas C Terwilliger; Geoffrey S Waldo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Compartmentation of glutathione: implications for the study of toxicity and disease.

Authors:  C V Smith; D P Jones; T M Guenthner; L H Lash; B H Lauterburg
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Bromomaleimides: new reagents for the selective and reversible modification of cysteine.

Authors:  Lauren M Tedaldi; Mark E B Smith; Ramiz I Nathani; James R Baker
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  In situ maleimide bridging of disulfides and a new approach to protein PEGylation.

Authors:  Felix F Schumacher; Muriel Nobles; Chris P Ryan; Mark E B Smith; Andrew Tinker; Stephen Caddick; James R Baker
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.774

5.  Tunable reagents for multi-functional bioconjugation: reversible or permanent chemical modification of proteins and peptides by control of maleimide hydrolysis.

Authors:  Chris P Ryan; Mark E B Smith; Felix F Schumacher; Dina Grohmann; Danai Papaioannou; Gabriel Waksman; Finn Werner; James R Baker; Stephen Caddick
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Protein modification, bioconjugation, and disulfide bridging using bromomaleimides.

Authors:  Mark E B Smith; Felix F Schumacher; Chris P Ryan; Lauren M Tedaldi; Danai Papaioannou; Gabriel Waksman; Stephen Caddick; James R Baker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 15.419

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Thiol Specific and Tracelessly Removable Bioconjugation via Michael Addition to 5-Methylene Pyrrolones.

Authors:  Yingqian Zhang; Xiaoping Zhou; Yonghui Xie; Marc M Greenberg; Zhen Xi; Chuanzheng Zhou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Reducible, dibromomaleimide-linked polymers for gene delivery.

Authors:  James-Kevin Y Tan; Jennifer L Choi; Hua Wei; Joan G Schellinger; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.843

3.  Bioconjugation of green fluorescent protein via an unexpectedly stable cyclic sulfonium intermediate.

Authors:  Ramiz Nathani; Paul Moody; Mark E B Smith; Richard J Fitzmaurice; Stephen Caddick
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  A novel synthetic chemistry approach to linkage-specific ubiquitin conjugation.

Authors:  Rachel E Morgan; Vijay Chudasama; Paul Moody; Mark E B Smith; Stephen Caddick
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  A platform for efficient, thiol-stable conjugation to albumin's native single accessible cysteine.

Authors:  Mark E B Smith; Mikael B Caspersen; Eifion Robinson; Maurício Morais; Antoine Maruani; João P M Nunes; Karl Nicholls; Malcolm J Saxton; Stephen Caddick; James R Baker; Vijay Chudasama
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  A mild synthesis of N-functionalised bromomaleimides, thiomaleimides and bromopyridazinediones.

Authors:  Lourdes Castañeda; Zoë V F Wright; Cristina Marculescu; Trang M Tran; Vijay Chudasama; Antoine Maruani; Elizabeth A Hull; João P M Nunes; Richard J Fitzmaurice; Mark E B Smith; Lyn H Jones; Stephen Caddick; James R Baker
Journal:  Tetrahedron Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.415

7.  PEGylation and Dimerization of Expressed Proteins under Near Equimolar Conditions with Potassium 2-Pyridyl Acyltrifluoroborates.

Authors:  Christopher J White; Jeffrey W Bode
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 14.553

8.  Homogeneous antibody fragment conjugation by disulfide bridging introduces 'spinostics'.

Authors:  Felix F Schumacher; Vishal A Sanchania; Berend Tolner; Zoë V F Wright; Chris P Ryan; Mark E B Smith; John M Ward; Stephen Caddick; Christopher W M Kay; Gabriel Aeppli; Kerry A Chester; James R Baker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A novel approach to the site-selective dual labelling of a protein via chemoselective cysteine modification.

Authors:  Ramiz I Nathani; Paul Moody; Vijay Chudasama; Mark E B Smith; Richard J Fitzmaurice; Stephen Caddick
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Double quick, double click reversible peptide "stapling".

Authors:  Claire M Grison; George M Burslem; Jennifer A Miles; Ludwig K A Pilsl; David J Yeo; Zeynab Imani; Stuart L Warriner; Michael E Webb; Andrew J Wilson
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.