Yannick Berker1, Joel S Karp2, Volkmar Schulz3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA, and the Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. 3. Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
The use of scattered coincidences for attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) data has recently been proposed. For practical applications, convergence speeds require further improvement, yet there exists a trade-off between convergence speed and the risk of non-convergence. In this respect, a maximum-likelihood gradient-ascent (MLGA) algorithm and a two-branch back-projection (2BP), which was previously proposed, were evaluated. METHODS: MLGA was combined with the Armijo step size rule; and accelerated using conjugate gradients, Nesterov's momentum method, and data subsets of different sizes. In 2BP, we varied the subset size, an important determinant of convergence speed and computational burden. We used three sets of simulation data to evaluate the impact of a spatial scale factor. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The Armijo step size allowed 10-fold increased step sizes compared to native MLGA. Conjugate gradients and Nesterov momentum lead to slightly faster, yet non-uniform convergence; improvements were mostly confined to later iterations, possibly due to the non-linearity of the problem. MLGA with data subsets achieved faster, uniform, and predictable convergence, with a speed-up factor equivalent to the number of subsets and no increase in computational burden. By contrast, 2BP computational burden increased linearly with the number of subsets due to repeated evaluation of the objective function, and convergence was limited to the case of many (and therefore small) subsets, which resulted in high computational burden. CONCLUSION: Possibilities of improving 2BP appear limited. While general-purpose acceleration methods appear insufficient for MLGA, results suggest that data subsets are a promising way of improving MLGA performance.
The use of scattered coincidences for attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) data has recently been proposed. For practical applications, convergence speeds require further improvement, yet there exists a trade-off between convergence speed and the risk of non-convergence. In this respect, a maximum-likelihood gradient-ascent (MLGA) algorithm and a two-branch back-projection (2BP), which was previously proposed, were evaluated. METHODS: MLGA was combined with the Armijo step size rule; and accelerated using conjugate gradients, Nesterov's momentum method, and data subsets of different sizes. In 2BP, we varied the subset size, an important determinant of convergence speed and computational burden. We used three sets of simulation data to evaluate the impact of a spatial scale factor. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The Armijo step size allowed 10-fold increased step sizes compared to native MLGA. Conjugate gradients and Nesterov momentum lead to slightly faster, yet non-uniform convergence; improvements were mostly confined to later iterations, possibly due to the non-linearity of the problem. MLGA with data subsets achieved faster, uniform, and predictable convergence, with a speed-up factor equivalent to the number of subsets and no increase in computational burden. By contrast, 2BP computational burden increased linearly with the number of subsets due to repeated evaluation of the objective function, and convergence was limited to the case of many (and therefore small) subsets, which resulted in high computational burden. CONCLUSION: Possibilities of improving 2BP appear limited. While general-purpose acceleration methods appear insufficient for MLGA, results suggest that data subsets are a promising way of improving MLGA performance.
Authors: André Salomon; Andreas Goedicke; Bernd Schweizer; Til Aach; Volkmar Schulz Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ahmadreza Rezaei; Michel Defrise; Girish Bal; Christian Michel; Maurizio Conti; Charles Watson; Johan Nuyts Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Yoshito Otake; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kyungsang Kim; Donghwan Kim; Jaewon Yang; Georges El Fakhri; Youngho Seo; Jeffrey A Fessler; Quanzheng Li Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Joseph Lillington; Ludovica Brusaferri; Kerstin Kläser; Karin Shmueli; Radhouene Neji; Brian F Hutton; Francesco Fraioli; Simon Arridge; Manuel Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Kris Thielemans; David Atkinson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 4.071