Literature DB >> 27101120

Practice Bulletin No. 163 Summary: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.

.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic screening is designed to assess whether a patient is at increased risk of having a fetus affected by a genetic disorder. In contrast, prenatal genetic diagnostic testing is intended to determine, with as much certainty as possible, whether a specific genetic disorder or condition is present in the fetus. The purpose of prenatal screening for aneuploidy is to provide an assessment of the woman's risk of carrying a fetus with one of the more common fetal aneuploidies. This is in contrast to prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, in which the fetal chromosomes are evaluated for the presence or absence of abnormalities in chromosome number, deletions, and duplications, or the fetal DNA is evaluated for specific genetic disorders. The wide variety of screening test options, each offering varying levels of information and accuracy, has resulted in the need for complex counseling by the health care provider and complex decision making by the patient. No one screening test is superior to other screening tests in all test characteristics. Each test has relative advantages and disadvantages. It is important that obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers be prepared to discuss not only the risk of aneuploidy but also the benefits, risks, and limitations of available screening tests. Screening for aneuploidy should be an informed patient choice, with an underlying foundation of shared decision making that fits the patient's clinical circumstances, values, interests, and goals.The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide current information regarding the available screening test options for fetal aneuploidy and to review their benefits, accuracy, and limitations. For information regarding prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, refer to Practice Bulletin No. 162, Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27101120     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

2.  Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Kathryn M Reese; Jennifer Czerwinski; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Malorie Jones; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Concerns About Justification for Fetal Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Leslie P Francis; Nancy C Rose
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 5.  The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.

Authors:  Riwa Sabbagh; Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Supporting Patient Autonomy and Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Katie Stoll; Judith Jackson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

Review 7.  Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

8.  Early Antenatal Prediction of Gestational Diabetes in Obese Women: Development of Prediction Tools for Targeted Intervention.

Authors:  Sara L White; Debbie A Lawlor; Annette L Briley; Keith M Godfrey; Scott M Nelson; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Stephen C Robson; Naveed Sattar; Paul T Seed; Matias C Vieira; Paul Welsh; Melissa Whitworth; Lucilla Poston; Dharmintra Pasupathy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The prediction of late-onset preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study.

Authors:  Offer Erez; Roberto Romero; Eli Maymon; Piya Chaemsaithong; Bogdan Done; Percy Pacora; Bogdan Panaitescu; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Sha Liu; Hongqian Liu; Jianlong Liu; Ting Bai; Xiaosha Jing; Tianyu Xia; Cechuan Deng; Yunyun Liu; Jing Cheng; Xiang Wei; Lingling Xing; Yuan Luo; Quanfang Zhou; Qian Zhu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.