Literature DB >> 19136086

Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

Alison G Cahill1, George A Macones, David M Stamilio, Jeffrey M Dicke, James P Crane, Anthony O Odibo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the attributable pregnancy loss rate of mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. STUDY
DESIGN: A 16-year retrospective cohort of all twin pregnancies that underwent ultrasound evaluation at a large tertiary care medical center was followed for pregnancy outcomes. Women who underwent amniocentesis were compared with those who did not. Fetal loss was defined as loss before 24 weeks' gestation. Univariable, stratified, multivariable, and time-to-event analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Of 1934 twin pregnancies, 311 women elected amniocentesis. Women who elected amniocentesis were more likely to experience a pregnancy loss than those who did not (3.2% vs 1.4%; risk difference, 1.80%; 95% CI, -0.24 to 3.84%), which was significant after adjustment for advanced maternal age, chorionicity, sonographic findings, alcohol exposure, and race (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9).
CONCLUSION: The attributable risk of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks' gestation after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies is 1 in 56 (1.8%). This information will be useful in counseling patients with twin pregnancies who are considering amniocentesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136086     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Kathryn M Reese; Jennifer Czerwinski; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Malorie Jones; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes.

Authors:  Lorene A Temming; Jennifer K Durst; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Jeffrey M Dicke; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Joy Vink; Karin Fuchs; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Mi Sun Kim; Myoung Jin Moon; Sukho Kang; Sang Hee Jung; Sung Woon Chang; Hyo Jin Ki; Bohye Kim; Eunhee Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.

Authors:  Ewelina Litwinska; Magdalena Litwinska; Bartosz Czuba; Agnieszka Gach; Sebastian Kwiatkowski; Przemyslaw Kosinski; Piotr Kaczmarek; Miroslaw Wielgos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening.

Authors:  B Boyle; J K Morris; R McConkey; E Garne; M Loane; M C Addor; M Gatt; M Haeusler; A Latos-Bielenska; N Lelong; R McDonnell; C Mullaney; M O'Mahony; H Dolk
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 6.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.