Literature DB >> 29521280

Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac.

S J Woodings1, J J Bluemink, J H W de Vries, Y Niatsetski, B van Veelen, J Schillings, J G M Kok, J W H Wolthaus, S L Hackett, B van Asselen, H M van Zijp, S Pencea, D A Roberts, J J W Lagendijk, B W Raaymakers.   

Abstract

As a prerequisite for clinical treatments it was necessary to characterize the Elekta 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF radiation beam. Following acceptance testing, beam characterization data were acquired with Semiflex 3D (PTW 31021), microDiamond (PTW 60019), and Farmer-type (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65-G) detectors in an Elekta 3D scanning water phantom and a PTW 1D water phantom. EBT3 Gafchromic film and ion chamber measurements in a buildup cap were also used. Special consideration was given to scan offsets, detector effective points of measurement and avoiding air gaps. Machine performance has been verified and the system satisfied the relevant beam requirements of IEC60976. Beam data were acquired for field sizes between 1  ×  1 and 57  ×  22 cm2. New techniques were developed to measure percentage depth dose (PDD) curves including the electron return effect at beam exit, which exhibits an electron-type practical range of 1.2 ± 0.1 cm. The Lorentz force acting on the secondary charged particles creates an asymmetry in the crossline profiles with an average shift of  +0.24 cm. For a 10  ×  10 cm2 beam, scatter from the cryostat contributes 1% of the dose at isocentre. This affects the relative output factors, scatter factors and beam profiles, both in-field and out-of-field. The average 20%-80% penumbral width measured for small fields with a microDiamond detector at 10 cm depth is 0.50 cm. MRI-linac penumbral widths are very similar to that of the Elekta Agility linac MLC, as is the near-surface dose PDD(0.2 cm)  =  57%. The entrance surface dose is  ∼36% of Dmax. Cryostat transmission is quantified for inclusion within the treatment planning system. As a result, the 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF beam has been characterised for the first time and is suitable for clinical use. This was a key step towards the first clinical treatments with the MRI-linac, which were delivered at University Medical Center Utrecht in May 2017 (Raaymakers et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 L41-50).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29521280     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of MU2net as an online secondary dose check for MR guided radiation therapy with the Elekta unity MR linac.

Authors:  Ariadne S Shoobridge; John A Baines
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Quantitative assessment of acquisition imaging parameters on MRI radiomics features: a prospective anthropomorphic phantom study using a 3D-T2W-TSE sequence for MR-guided-radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Cindy Xue; Gladys Lo; Oi Lei Wong; Yihang Zhou; Siu Ki Yu; Kin Yin Cheung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

3.  Clinical Implementation and Initial Experience With a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac for MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Cancer: An R-IDEAL Stage 1 and 2a First in Humans Feasibility Study of New Technology Implementation.

Authors:  David S Lakomy; Jinzhong Yang; Sastry Vedam; Jihong Wang; Belinda Lee; Angela Sobremonte; Pamela Castillo; Neil Hughes; Mustefa Mohammedsaid; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp; Seungtaek Choi; C David Fuller; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Snyder; Joël St-Aubin; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Amanda Boczkowski; David A P Dunkerley; Stephen A Graves; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid M White; Erica Scurr; Andreas Wetscherek; Gina Brown; Aslam Sohaib; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; David Dearnaley; Susan Lalondrelle; Shreerang Bhide
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Focal salvage treatment for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: A magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning study.

Authors:  Thomas Willigenburg; Ellis Beld; Jochem Hes; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans C J de Boer; Marinus A Moerland; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-07

7.  In-Air Electron Streaming Effect for Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy With a 1.5 T Perpendicular Magnetic Field: A Treatment Planning Study.

Authors:  Hongdong Liu; Shouliang Ding; Bin Wang; Yongbao Li; Ying Sun; Xiaoyan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac.

Authors:  Marcus Powers; John Baines; Robert Crane; Chantelle Fisher; Stephen Gibson; Linda Marsh; Bronwyn Oar; Ariadne Shoobridge; Emily Simpson-Page; Marchant Van der Walt; Glenn de Vine
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-03-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.