Literature DB >> 23143737

Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial.

Fatema S Uddin1, Ramiz Iqbal, William V Harford, Kerry B Dunbar, Byron L Cryer, Stuart J Spechler, Linda A Feagins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy can be technically challenging in obese patients. It has been proposed (with little supporting data) that prone positioning of obese patients might facilitate a difficult colonoscopy. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine if starting colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients decreases cecal intubation times.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized study conducted at the North Texas VA Medical Center. Patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m(2) undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to either initial prone positioning or standard, left-lateral positioning. The outcome measurements were cecal intubation time, frequency of repositioning, sedative medications used, reports of pain, complications, and procedure tolerability.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomized to have colonoscopy starting in the standard, left-lateral decubitus position, and 51 to the prone position. The average cecal intubation time for the standard group was 550 vs. 424 s in the prone group (p = 0.03). Patient repositioning was used in 28 % of patients in the standard group versus 8 % in the prone group (p = 0.009). There was no difference in subjective reports of pain between groups (p = 0.95) or in average pain scores (p = 0.79). Follow-up interviews were conducted in 93 % of patients, all of whom said that they would be willing to have repeat colonoscopy in the same position.
CONCLUSIONS: Performance of colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients results in significantly shorter cecal intubation times and decreased need for patient repositioning. Prone positioning is well accepted and does not significantly increase procedure-related discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143737     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2468-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

1.  The technique of abdominal pressure in total colonoscopy.

Authors:  J D Waye; S A Yessayan; B S Lewis; T L Fabry
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors.

Authors:  Fatima A Haggar; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

3.  Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; David Lieberman; Robert Hiatt; Mika Nagamine; Stephanie L Van Bebber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Colonoscopy: Art or science?

Authors:  Ian C Roberts-Thomson; Edward Teo
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-01

Review 6.  Endoscopy in the obese patient.

Authors:  Mitchal A Schreiner; M Brian Fennerty
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Incidence of sleep-disordered breathing in an urban adult population: the relative importance of risk factors in the development of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Peter V Tishler; Emma K Larkin; Mark D Schluchter; Susan Redline
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Sharon A Chung; Hongbo Yuan; Frances Chung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian B Borg; Nitin K Gupta; Gary R Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events.

Authors:  Alireza Ansary Moghaddam; Mark Woodward; Rachel Huxley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Colonoscopy in obese patients: time to change position.

Authors:  Alfredo J Lucendo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The Impact of the Colonoscopy Starting Position and Its Potential Outcomes.

Authors:  Pallavi Shah; Nehal Patel; Alhareth Alsayed; Steven Miller; Nitish Singh Nandu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-14

5.  Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Gyu Man Oh; Kyoungwon Jung; Sung Eun Kim; Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Comparison of left versus right lateral starting position on colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Daryl Ramai; Jameel Singh; Olivia W Brooks; Mohamed Barakat; Babu P Mohan; Saurabh Chandan; Shahab R Khan; Banreet Dhindsa; Amaninder Dhaliwal; Andrew Ofosu; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-03

7.  Right Or Left in COLonoscopy (ROLCOL)? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Right- versus Left-Sided Starting Position in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  N Vergis; A K McGrath; C H Stoddart; Jonathan M Hoare
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Use of an Abdominal Compression Device in Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Holly O Cirri; Renuka Kelapure; Joseph A Galanko; Christopher F Martin; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Different position from traditional left lateral for colonoscopy? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Snow Yunni Lin; Clyve Yu Leon Yaow; Cheng Han Ng; Neng Wei Wong; Hui Yu Tham; Choon Seng Chong
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2020-10-22

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of the starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Daeho Park; Eiichi Kakehi; Kazuoki Inoue; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.