Literature DB >> 23047390

Impact factors for difficult cecal intubation during colonoscopy.

Chih-Ming Liang1, Yi-Chun Chiu, Keng-Liang Wu, William Tam, Wei-Chen Tai, Ming-Luen Hu, Yeh-Pin Chou, King-Wah Chiu, Seng-Kee Chuah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no accepted means of identifying patients in whom colonoscopy is likely to be more difficult and allocate time accordingly. AIMS: To identify patient-related, endoscopist-related, and procedure-related factors associated with difficult cecal intubation.
METHODS: This was a prospective study performed at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, from January to December 2009. Data pertaining to patient information (age, sex, weight, waist circumference and buttock girth, bowel habit, and abdomen surgery history) were recorded prospectively. Procedure-specific information including the need to alter patient position, application of external compression, and cecal intubation time (CIT) was documented.
RESULTS: A total of 859 consecutive patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 ± 11.4 years. CIT was longer in women compared with men (410 ± 195 vs. 376 ± 224 s; P = 0.021). Older patients had longer CITs--an additional 2.1 seconds for each incremental year (P = 0.001), and poor bowel preparation increased CIT (P = 0.019). Patients who required a position change or abdominal compression took longer to reach the cecum (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the importance of colon preparation and the need for abdominal compression and a change of position when performing a difficult colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047390     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182611c69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  9 in total

1.  Colonoscopy in obese patients: time to change position.

Authors:  Alfredo J Lucendo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Comparison of Water Immersion Versus Air Insufflation Colonoscopy Under Various Bowel Preparation Conditions.

Authors:  Sijia Niu; Youlin Yang; Guoyin Shang; Yingying Chen; Zhibin Ma; Feng Wu; Huichao Zhang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Factors Influencing Cecal Intubation Time during Retrograde Approach Single-Balloon Enteroscopy.

Authors:  Tzu-Ming Ou; Peng-Jen Chen; Yu-Lueng Shih; Meng-Ting Wang; Hsin-Hung Huang; Wei-Kuo Chang; Tsai-Yuan Hsieh; Tien-Yu Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: The impact of obesity indices.

Authors:  Soo Yun Moon; Byung Chang Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Bun Kim; Chang Won Hong; Bum Joon Park; Kum Hei Ryu; Ji Hyung Nam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Correlation between obesity and metabolic syndrome-related factors and cecal intubation time during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ryo Kawasato; Shinichi Hashimoto; Tomohiro Shirasawa; Atsushi Goto; Takeshi Okamoto; Jun Nishikawa; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-05

7.  Factors for cecal intubation time during colonoscopy in women: Impact of surgical history.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Nam; Jung Hyeon Lee; Jae Hak Kim; Hyoun Woo Kang; Dong Kee Jang; Yun Jeong Lim; Moon-Soo Koh; Hyun Soo Park; Eun-Cheol Park; Jun Kyu Lee; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; Thomas M Runge; Holly Cirri; Christopher F Martin; Evan S Dellon; Seth D Crockett
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res       Date:  2018

9.  Post-endoscopic procedure satisfaction scores: Can we improve?

Authors:  Ankita Munjal; Joshua M Steinberg; Afnan Mossaad; Samuel J Kallus; Mark C Mattar; Nadim G Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.