Literature DB >> 11677470

Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

J C Anderson1, C R Messina, W Cohn, E Gottfried, S Ingber, G Bernstein, E Coman, J Polito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prediction of a technically difficult colonoscopy may influence patient selection and procedure scheduling. Identification of predictive factors may be difficult because a common endpoint used to evaluate the success of colonoscopy is intubation of the cecum, which is usually achieved. The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of using an alternative measure, time required for cecal intubation, to identify factors that can impact performance of colonoscopy.
METHODS: The time required for cecal intubation was prospectively recorded for 802 consecutive outpatient colonoscopies performed by 7 experienced gastroenterologists. Patient data collected included height, weight, age, bowel habits, surgical history, and findings at colonoscopy. Forty-seven examinations that were stopped because of disease or unacceptable bowel preparation were excluded. The impact of the patient characteristics of the remaining sample of 755 patients on the median time required for cecal intubation for men and women was examined.
RESULTS: Older age and female gender, body mass index < or =25.0 (regardless of gender), diverticular disease in women, and a history of constipation or reported laxative use in men were predictors of difficult colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: By using median time required for cecal intubation, several patient characteristics were identified that may predict technical difficulty at colonoscopy. These findings have implications for practice and teaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11677470     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.118950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  74 in total

1.  Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?

Authors:  Maria Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Rossella Cianci; Alessandra Bizzotto; Cristiano Spada; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hoi-Poh Tee; Crispin Corte; Hamdan Al-Ghamdi; Emilia Prakoso; John Darke; Raman Chettiar; Wassim Rahman; Scott Davison; Sean-P Griffin; Warwick-S Selby; Arthur-J Kaffes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The frequency of early repeat tests after colonoscopy in elderly medicare recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Richards; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

Authors:  Jae Il Chung; Nayoung Kim; Min Sik Um; Kyung Phil Kang; Donghun Lee; Jong Chun Na; Eun Sil Lee; Yeon Mu Chung; Ji Yeon Won; Kwang Ho Lee; Tek Man Nam; Jung Hun Lee; Hyun Chul Choi; Sang Hyub Lee; Young Soo Park; Jin Hyuk Hwang; Jin-Wook Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Delayed presentation of splenic rupture following colonoscopy: clinical and CT findings.

Authors:  Shelby J Fishback; Perry J Pickhardt; Sanjeev Bhalla; Christine O Menias; Robert G Congdon; Michael Macari
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02

8.  A randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation during colonoscopy without sedation.

Authors:  Makoto Arai; Kenichiro Okimoto; Hideaki Ishigami; Takashi Taida; Arata Oyamada; Shoko Minemura; Keiko Saito; Masaru Tsuboi; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoaki Matsumura; Tomoo Nakagawa; Tatsuro Katsuno; Kanae Mitsuhashi; Yuki Nakagawa; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Predictors of CT colonography utilization among asymptomatic medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Michael Harhay; Anna Lev-Toaff; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Clinical significance of colonic diverticulosis associated with bowel symptoms and colon polyp.

Authors:  Kang-Moon Lee; Chang-Nyol Paik; Woo Chul Chung; Sung Hoon Jung; U-Im Chang; Jin Mo Yang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.