| Literature DB >> 29518938 |
Ping Li1, Christine Schille2, Ernst Schweizer3, Frank Rupp4, Alexander Heiss5, Claudia Legner6, Ulrich E Klotz7, Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer8, Lutz Scheideler9.
Abstract
Zn-based biodegradableEntities:
Keywords: biodegradable metals; biomaterials; corrosion; cytotoxicity; zinc alloy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29518938 PMCID: PMC5877616 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) Calculated Zn-Ag phase diagram using the Themo-Calc 2017a software (Thermo-Calc Software AB, Solna, Sweden) and the SNOB-3 database. (b) Detail of the phase diagram in (a) manifesting that up to 6 wt % Ag can be solved in Zn. Upon cooling, the composition enters the two-phase area, i.e., precipitations of ε-AgZn3 in the Zn matrix occur. As this effect is generally accompanied by an increase in strength, it is referred to as precipitation hardening.
Figure 2Optical micrograph of: (a) the as-cast Zn-4Ag dendritic microstructure; (b) longitudinal sections after thermomechanical treatment (homogenization, swaging and solution annealing); and (c) after precipitation hardening showing globular grains. Large ε-AgZn3 grains (bright) can be identified in the cross-sections.
Assessment of mechanical properties by tensile testing and Vickers hardness tests.
| Alloy/Processing | Mechanical Properties | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield Strength (YS0.2) (MPa) | Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) (MPa) | Elongation to Failure (%) | Hardness (HV1) | ||
| Zn-4Ag * | 157 | 261 | 37 | 73 | In this study |
| Zn-4Ag ** | 149 | 215 | 24 | 82 | In this study |
| WE43/extruded | 195 | 280 | 10 | - | [ |
| Zn/cast | 10 | 18 | 0.32 | 38 | [ |
| Zn/extruded | 35 | 60 | 3.5 | - | [ |
| Zn/hot rolled | 30–110 | 50–140 | 5.8–36 | 39 | [ |
| Zn-2.5Ag/extruded | 147 | 203 | 35 | - | [ |
| Zn-5Ag/extruded | 205 | 253 | 36 | - | [ |
| Zn-7Ag/extruded | 236 | 287 | 32 | - | [ |
* Thermomechanical treatment; ** Additional precipitation hardening. While the aspired precipitation hardening essentially resulted only in a slight increase in hardness, yield strength and ultimate tensile tended to decrease. This may be because precipitates had formed beforehand
Figure 3X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (black) of Zn-4Ag after thermomechanical treatment. The phases Zn (03–065–3358, blue) and ε-AgZn3 (00–025–1325, orange) were identified.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope (SEM) investigation of the microstructure after thermomechanical treatment. (a) For the sake of resolution, SE imaging of the BIB polished surface and the corresponding EDX analysis were performed at 6 kV. The overlay shows that ε-AgZn3 particles have formed along the grain boundaries while the proximity is Ag depleted; (b) the 20 kV BSE imaging revealed the presence of ε-AgZn3 precipitates within the Zn grains.
Figure 5Corrosion rates of pure Zn and Zn-4Ag in DMEM and McCoy’s 5A calculated from released Zn ions.
Composition of the blood plasma, DMEM and McCoy’s 5A [30,31,32].
| Inorganic Ions (mmol L−1) | Organic Components | Concentrations of Buffering Agents (mmol L−1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composition Title | Na | K | Mg | Cl | Ca | HPO4 | SO4 | HCO3 | Protein (g L−1) | Glucose (mmol L−1) | Amino Acids (g L−1) | |
| Blood plasma | 142 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 103.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 27.0 | 63–80 | 3.6–5.2 | Variable | 43.5–45.5 |
| DMEM | 127.3 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 90.8 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 44.1 | - | 4.5 | 1.6 | 70 |
| McCoy’s 5A | 141.0 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 117.2 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 26.2 | - | 16.6 | 0.4 | 30.4 |
Figure 6The SEM-EDX analysis of the Zn-4Ag alloy after immersion in DMEM/McCoy’s 5A for 24 h: (a) SEM images of Zn-4Ag alloy in DMEM (magnification 1000×); (b) EDX result of the degradation products in (a); (c) SEM images of Zn-4Ag alloy in McCoy’s 5A (magnification 1000×); and (d) EDX result of the degradation products in (c).
The mean Zn ion concentration in pure Zn and Zn-4Ag alloy extracts.
| Cell Medium | Samples | Zn Ion Concentration (μmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Extracts | 33.3% Extracts | 16.7% Extracts | 10% Extracts | ||
| DMEM | Pure Zn | 314.4 | 107.4 | 55.5 | 34.7 |
| Zn-4Ag | 493.4 | 167.2 | 85.4 | 52.6 | |
| McCoy’s 5A | Pure Zn | 132.8 | 51.5 | 31.1 | 22.9 |
| Zn-4Ag | 174.4 | 65.4 | 38.0 | 27.0 | |
Figure 7Effect of different concentrations of Zn-4Ag alloy and pure Zn extracts on the cell metabolic activity of L929 and Saos-2 determined by XTT assay. Ti-6Al-4V alloy was used as the negative control and was set to 100%. Means of three independent experiments are shown with respective standard deviations.
Figure 8Influence of different concentrations of Zn-4Ag alloy and pure Zn extracts on the cell proliferation of L929 and Saos-2 determined by BrdU assay. Ti-6Al-4V alloy was used as negative control and was set to 100%. Means of two independent experiments are shown with respective standard deviations.
Figure 9Biofilm formation and initial bacterial adhesion on Ti-6Al-4V alloy (a,b); and Zn-4Ag alloy (c,d) after incubation with S. gordonii for 12 h. Images obtained by: (a,c) crystal violet staining (magnification 32×); and (b,d) live/dead staining (magnification 400×).