Literature DB >> 8798169

The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.

J F Schenck1.   

Abstract

The concept of magnetic susceptibility is central to many current research and development activities in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); for example, the development of MR-guided surgery has created a need for surgical instruments and other devices with susceptibility tailored to the MR environment; susceptibility effects can lead to position errors of up to several millimeters in MR-guided stereotactic surgery; and the variation of magnetic susceptibility on a microscopic scale within tissues contributes to MR contrast and is the basis of functional MRI. The magnetic aspects of MR compatibility are discussed in terms of two levels of acceptability: Materials with the first kind of magnetic field compatibility are such that magnetic forces and torques do not interfere significantly when the materials are used within the magnetic field of the scanner; materials with the second kind of magnetic field compatibility meet the more demanding requirement that they produce only negligible artifacts within the MR image and their effect on the positional accuracy of features within the image is negligible or can readily be corrected. Several materials exhibiting magnetic field compatibility of the second kind have been studied and a group of materials that produce essentially no image distortion, even when located directly within the imaging field of view, is identified. Because of demagnetizing effects, the shape and orientation, as well as the susceptibility, of objects within and adjacent to the imaging region is important in MRI. The quantitative use of susceptibility data is important to MRI, but the use of literature values for the susceptibility of materials is often difficult because of inconsistent traditions in the definitions and units used for magnetic parameters-particularly susceptibility. The uniform use of SI units for magnetic susceptibility and related quantities would help to achieve consistency and avoid confusion in MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798169     DOI: 10.1118/1.597854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  291 in total

1.  A new vibrotactile stimulator for functional MRI.

Authors:  G S Harrington; C T Wright; J H Downs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The contribution of chemical exchange to MRI frequency shifts in brain tissue.

Authors:  Karin Shmueli; Stephen J Dodd; Tie-Qiang Li; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Modeling of active shimming of metallic needles for interventional MRI.

Authors:  Saikat Sengupta
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Nonexponential T₂ decay in white matter.

Authors:  Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Jongho Lee; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The Behaviors of Ferro-Magnetic Nano-Particles In and Around Blood Vessels under Applied Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  A Nacev; C Beni; O Bruno; B Shapiro
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 6.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Improving chemical shift encoded water-fat separation using object-based information of the magnetic field inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Samir D Sharma; Nathan S Artz; Diego Hernando; Debra E Horng; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Time-resolved MRI oximetry for quantifying CMRO(2) and vascular reactivity.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Zachary B Rodgers; Varsha Jain; Michael C Langham; Cheng Li; Daniel J Licht; Jeremy Magland
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Accelerating sequences in the presence of metal by exploiting the spatial distribution of off-resonance.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Kevin M Koch; Alexey Samsonov; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.