Literature DB >> 23429234

Comparison of different in vitro tests for biocompatibility screening of Mg alloys.

L Scheideler1, C Füger, C Schille, F Rupp, H-P Wendel, N Hort, H P Reichel, J Geis-Gerstorfer.   

Abstract

Standard cell culture tests according to ISO 10993 have only limited value for the biocompatibility screening of degradable biomaterials such as Mg alloys. The correlation between in vitro and in vivo results is poor. Standard cytotoxicity tests mimic the clinical situation to only a limited extent, since in vivo proteins and macromolecules in the blood and interstitial liquid will influence the corrosion behaviour and, hence, biocompatibility of Mg alloys to a significant extent. We therefore developed a modified cytotoxicity test simulating the in vivo conditions by use of bovine serum as the extraction vehicle instead of the cell culture medium routinely used in standard cytotoxicity testing according to ISO 10993-5. The modified extraction test was applied to eight experimental Mg alloys. Cytotoxicity was assayed by inhibition of cell metabolic activity (XTT test). When extraction of the alloy samples was performed in serum instead of cell culture medium the metabolic activity was significantly less inhibited for six of the eight alloys. The reduction in apparent cytotoxicity under serum extraction conditions was most pronounced for MgZn1 (109% relative metabolic activity with serum extracts vs. 26% in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)), for MgY4 (103% in serum vs. 32% in DMEM) and for MgAl3Zn1 (84% vs. 17%), resulting in a completely different cytotoxicity ranking of the tested materials when serum extraction was used. We suppose that this test system has the potential to enhance the predictability of in vivo corrosion behaviour and biocompatibility of Mg-based materials for biodegradable medical devices.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility tests; Corrosion; Cytotoxicity; Magnesium alloys; Resorbable biomaterials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23429234     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  7 in total

Review 1.  Properties of open-cell porous metals and alloys for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A preliminary study for novel use of two Mg alloys (WE43 and Mg3Gd).

Authors:  Yu Guo; Weiwei Liu; Shanshan Ma; Jia Wang; Jingting Zou; Zhenzhen Liu; Jinghui Zhao; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Cytocompatibility of magnesium and AZ31 alloy with three types of cell lines using a direct in vitro method.

Authors:  Akira Mochizuki; Chie Yahata; Hung Takai
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL.

Authors:  Julia Matena; Svea Petersen; Matthias Gieseke; Michael Teske; Martin Beyerbach; Andreas Kampmann; Hugo Murua Escobar; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Heinz Haferkamp; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Mechanical Characteristics, In Vitro Degradation, Cytotoxicity, and Antibacterial Evaluation of Zn-4.0Ag Alloy as a Biodegradable Material.

Authors:  Ping Li; Christine Schille; Ernst Schweizer; Frank Rupp; Alexander Heiss; Claudia Legner; Ulrich E Klotz; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Lutz Scheideler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Magnesium for Implants: A Review on the Effect of Alloying Elements on Biocompatibility and Properties.

Authors:  S Fida Hassan; M T Islam; N Saheb; M M A Baig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Hollow silica reinforced magnesium nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and biological properties with computational modeling analysis for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Somasundaram Prasadh; Vyasaraj Manakari; Gururaj Parande; Raymond Chung Wen Wong; Manoj Gupta
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.