Literature DB >> 11059705

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol.

J E Widen1, R C Folsom, B Cone-Wesson, L Carty, J J Dunnell, K Koebsell, A Levi, L Mancl, B Ohlrich, S Trouba, M P Gorga, Y S Sininger, B R Vohr, S J Norton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the hearing status of the at-risk infants in the National Institutes of Health-Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment study sample at 8 to 12 mo corrected age (chronologic age adjusted for prematurity). 2) To describe the visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) protocol that was used to obtain monaural behavioral data for the sample.
DESIGN: All neonatal intensive care unit infants and well babies with risk factors (including well babies who failed neonatal tests) were targeted for follow-up behavioral evaluation once they had reached 8 mo corrected age. Three thousand one hundred and thirty-four (64.4%) of the 4868 surviving infants returned for at least one behavioral hearing evaluation, which employed a well-defined VRA protocol. VRA thresholds or minimum response levels (MRLs) were determined for speech and pure tones of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz for each ear using insert earphones.
RESULTS: More than 95% of the infants were reliably tested with the VRA protocol; 90% provided complete tests (four MRLs for both ears). Ninety-four percent of the at-risk infants were found to have normal hearing sensitivity (MRLs of 20 dB HL) at 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz in both ears. Of the infants, 2.2% had bilateral hearing impairment, and 3.4% had impairment in one ear only. More than 80% of the impaired ears had losses of mild-to-moderate degree.
CONCLUSIONS: This may be the largest study to attempt to follow all at-risk infants with behavioral audiometric testing, regardless of screening outcome, in an effort to validate the results of auditory brain stem response, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and transient evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the newborn period. It is one of only a few studies to report hearing status of infants at 1 yr of age, using VRA on a clinical population. Successful testing of more than 95% of the infants who returned for the VRA follow-up documents the feasibility of obtaining monaural behavioral data in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059705     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  26 in total

1.  Unilateral hearing loss is associated with worse speech-language scores in children.

Authors:  Judith E C Lieu; Nancy Tye-Murray; Roanne K Karzon; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel M Zeitler; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-04

4.  Novel and recurrent CIB2 variants, associated with nonsyndromic deafness, do not affect calcium buffering and localization in hair cells.

Authors:  Celia Zazo Seco; Arnaud P Giese; Sobia Shafique; Margit Schraders; Anne M M Oonk; Mike Grossheim; Jaap Oostrik; Tim Strom; Rashmi Hegde; Erwin van Wijk; Gregory I Frolenkov; Maleeha Azam; Helger G Yntema; Rolien H Free; Saima Riazuddin; Joke B G M Verheij; Ronald J Admiraal; Raheel Qamar; Zubair M Ahmed; Hannie Kremer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: issues unique to the under-1 population.

Authors:  Maura Cosetti; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-03

6.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Causation of permanent unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Anne Marie Tharpe; Douglas P Sladen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.