Literature DB >> 11059708

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: summary and recommendations.

S J Norton1, M P Gorga, J E Widen, R C Folsom, Y Sininger, B Cone-Wesson, B R Vohr, K A Fletcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes the results of a multi-center study, "Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment," sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of three measures of peripheral auditory system status, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brain stem responses (ABR), applied in the neonatal period in predicting hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age.
DESIGN: The design and implementation of this study are described in the first two articles in this series. Seven institutions participated in this study; 7179 infants were evaluated. Graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit and well babies with one or more risk factors for hearing loss were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Neonatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the "gold standard."
RESULTS: The major results of the study are described in the nine articles preceding this summary article. TEOAEs in response to an 80 dB pSPL click, DPOAEs in response to L1 = 65 and L2 = 50 dB SPL and ABR in response to a 30 dB nHL click performed well as predictors of permanent hearing loss of 30 dB or greater at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. All measures were robust with respect to infant state, test environment and infant medical status. No test performed perfectly.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data from this study, the 1993 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference-recommended protocol-an OAE test followed by an ABR test for those infants failing the OAE test-would result in low referral rate (96 to 98%). TEOAEs for 80 dB pSPL, ABR for 30 dB nHL and DPOAEs for L1 = 65 dB SPL and L2 = 50 dB SPL perform well in predicting hearing status based on the area under the relative operating characteristic curve. Accuracy for the OAE measurements are best when the speech awareness threshold or the pure-tone average for 2.0 kHz and 4 kHz are used as the gold standard. ABR accuracy varies little as a function of the frequencies included in the gold standard. In addition, 96% of those infants returning for VRA at 8 to 12 mo corrected age were able to provide reliable ear-specific behavioral thresholds using insert earphones and a rigorous psychophysical VRA protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059708     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  Neonatal screening for hearing loss: pilot study from a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  M John; A Balraj; M Kurien
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-03-31

Review 4.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: issues unique to the under-1 population.

Authors:  Maura Cosetti; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-03

5.  Impact of the presence of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) on outcomes of children at three years of age.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Julia Day; Harvey Dillon; Kirsty Gardner-Berry; Sanna Hou; Mark Seeto; Angela Wong; Vicky Zhang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Test-retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Hearing loss in children with very low birth weight: current review of epidemiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  R Cristobal; J S Oghalai
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as an objective tool for evaluating hearing dysfunction in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Henry L Lew; Eun Ha Lee; Yasushi Miyoshi; Douglas G Chang; Elaine S Date; James F Jerger
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.

Authors:  Haibin Sheng; Qian Zhou; Qixuan Wang; Yun Yu; Lihua Liu; Meie Liang; Xueyan Zhou; Hao Wu; Xiangrong Tang; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.