| Literature DB >> 29516004 |
Rosemarijn Jansen1, Kim Urgel2, Maarten J Cramer1, Egidius E H L van Aarnhem3, Peter P M Zwetsloot1, Pieter A Doevendans1, Jolanda Kluin4, Steven A J Chamuleau1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making in symptomatic patients after mitral valve (MV) repair remains challenging as echocardiographic reference values are lacking. In native MV disease intervention is recommended for mean transmitral pressure gradient (TPG) >15 mmHg or systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) >60 mmHg at peak exercise. Insight into standard stress echo parameters after MV repair may therefore aid to clinical decision-making during follow-up. HYPOTHESIS: Stress echocardiography derived parameters in asymptomatic patients after successful MV repair differ from current guidelines for native valves.Entities:
Keywords: mean transmitral pressure gradient; mitral valve repair; physical stress echocardiography; systolic pulmonary artery pressure; two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography
Year: 2018 PMID: 29516004 PMCID: PMC5826059 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Baseline characteristics (n = 25).
| Total population | |
|---|---|
| Age (mean, ±SD) | 54.0 (9.5) |
| Male ( | 19 (76) |
| BSA, m2 (mean, ±SD) | 2.0 (0.2) |
| Cardiac rhythm during stress echo ( | |
| – Sinus rhythm | 25 (100) |
| NYHA ( | |
| Class I | 25 (100) |
| Baseline medication ( | |
| – Beta-blocker | 3 (12) |
| Comorbidities ( | |
| – COPD/asthmatic bronchitis | 2 (8) |
| General condition/sportive state ( | |
| – Good, frequent activities | 20 (80) |
| Primary MV regurgitation etiology ( | 25 (100) |
| – Myxomatous degeneration | |
| Mitral leaflet pathology ( | |
| – Anterior | 2 (8) |
| MV surgery ( | |
| – MV repair | 25 (100) |
| MV annuloplasty ( | |
| – C–E Physio Ring 30/32/34/36/40 mm | 1 (4)/4 (16)/6 (24)/3 (12)/1 (4) |
| Indexed MV annuloplasty ring diameter | 17.6 (2.0) |
| Time interval since surgery, months (mean, ±SD) | 27 (16) |
BSA, body surface area; NYHA, New York Heart Association; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; MV, mitral valve; C–E, Carpentier–Edwards.
.
Stress echocardiographic characteristics at rest and peak exercise (n = 25).
| Resting | Peak exercise | Change peakrest | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate, bpm (mean, ±SD) | 76 (10) | 151 (15) | 0.000 | 76 (16) |
| SBP, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 132 (18) | 204 (27) | 0.000 | 72 (19) |
| DBP, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 84 (9) | 92 (13) | 0.000 | 8 (7) |
| MAP, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 100 (11) | 130 (15) | 0.000 | 29 (8) |
| LV EF, % (mean, ±SD) | 56.4 (4.9) | 59.4 (5.5) | 0.000 | 2.9 (2.1) |
| LV EF quality ( | 1.000 | |||
| – Good/impaired/poor | 21 (84)/4 (16)/0 (0) | 21 (84)/4 (16)/0 (0) | – | |
| LVESD, mm (mean, ±SD) | 3.6 (0.4) | – | – | – |
| LVEDD, mm (mean, ±SD) | 4.8 (0.5) | – | – | – |
| Stroke volume, mL (mean, ±SD) | 63.4 (16.2) | 65.1 (22.1) | 0.971 | −0.1 (12.3) |
| Mean TPG, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 3.2 (1.4) | 15.0 (3.4) | 0.000 | 11.8 (3.2) |
| Peak TPG, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 7.0 (2.6) | 25.9 (5.5) | 0.000 | 18.9 (4.8) |
| SPAP, mmHg (mean, ±SD) | 21.4 (3.8) | 41.8 (8.9) | 0.000 | 22.6 (8.3) |
| MV regurgitation severity ( | 0.500 | |||
| – None/trace/mild | 19 (76)/6 (24)/0 (0)0 (0) | 17 (68)/8 (32)/0 (0)0 (0) | – | |
| MV area, cm2 (mean, ±SD) | 1.5 (0.3) | – | – | – |
| AoS severity ( | 0.006 | |||
| – None/mild | 13 (52)/5 (20) | 12 (48)/5 (20) | – | |
| AR severity ( | 1.000 | |||
| – None/trace/mild | 22 (88)/1 (4)/0 (0) | 22 (88)/1 (4)/0 (0) | – | |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; LV, left ventricular; EF, ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; TPG, transmitral pressure gradient; SPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; MV, mitral valve; AoS, aortic stenosis; AR, aortic regurgitation.
Exercise characteristics (n = 25).
| Total population | |
|---|---|
| Maximal workload, W (mean, ±SD) | 166 (29) |
| Maximal workload, patients per group ( | 1 (4) |
| Exercise duration, min (mean, ±SD) | 24 (5) |
| Peak exercise heart rate (mean, ±SD) | 151 (15) |
| Reaching 85% of age-predicted HR ( | 19 (76) |
| Peak exercise blood pressure (mean, ±SD) | |
| – Systolic | 204 (27) |
| Stopping reason ( | |
| – (Leg) exhaustion | 25 (100) |
HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure.
Figure 1Boxplot figures showing the mean TPG directly post mitral valve repair, at rest (before stress echo) and peak exercise in asymptomatic patients post MV repair (n = 25). The reference line (thick line) is the current recommendation for intervention in native valve disease (3, 4). Abbreviation: TPG, transmitral pressure gradient; MV, mitral valve.
Figure 2Boxplot figures showing the SPAP directly post MV repair (n = 11), at rest (n = 8), and peak exercise (n = 14) in asymptomatic patients post MV repair. The reference line (thick line) is the current recommendation for intervention in native valve disease (3, 4). Abbreviations: SPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; MV, mitral valve.