Literature DB >> 21324641

Early hemodynamic changes versus peak values: what is more useful to predict occurrence of dyspnea during stress echocardiography in patients with asymptomatic mitral stenosis?

Eric Brochet1, Delphine Détaint, Olivier Fondard, Amale Tazi-Mezalek, David Messika-Zeitoun, Bernard Iung, Alec Vahanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In asymptomatic mitral stenosis (MS), the usefulness of peak exercise Doppler echocardiography (DE) values is acknowledged, but the role of values recorded during the first stage of DE remains unclear.
METHODS: DE was analyzed in 48 asymptomatic patients with significant MS and revealed dyspnea in 22 patients (46%).
RESULTS: MS severity and rest and peak systolic pulmonary artery pressures (SPAPs) were not different between patients who did and did not develop dyspnea. Progressions of mean gradient and relative SPAP (ratio of SPAP/baseline SPAP) were significantly greater in patients who developed dyspnea compared with those who did not (P < .01), whereas no difference was observed for absolute SPAP progression (P = .28). Onset of dyspnea was associated with a high increase of relative SPAP (>90% at 60W, OR 2.31; CI, 1.2-4.8; P = .02) but not with the 60 mm Hg peak SPAP threshold (OR 1.3; CI, 0.7-43.1; P = .40).
CONCLUSION: DE reveals symptoms in 46% of patients who are considered asymptomatic. Despite similar peak values, these patients have different hemodynamic parameters during the first level of exercise compared with patients remaining asymptomatic. This may lead to the integration of early hemodynamic changes in the evaluation of exercise tolerance.
Copyright © 2011 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21324641     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  7 in total

1.  Impact of Pulmonary Hypertension on Outcome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Julien Magne; Dania Mohty; Alessandro Piccardo; Cyrille Boulogne; Mathieu Deltreuil; Vincent Petitalot; Najmeddine Echahidi; Nicole Darodes; Patrice Virot; Thibaud Damy; Victor Aboyans
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Exercise Testing and Stress Imaging in Mitral Valve Disease.

Authors:  Damien Voilliot; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  Exercise Testing and Stress Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-07

4.  Practical guidance for the implementation of stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Kengo Suzuki; Yutaka Hirano; Hirotsugu Yamada; Mitsushige Murata; Masao Daimon; Masaaki Takeuchi; Yoshihiro Seo; Chisato Izumi; Makoto Akaishi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-06-06

5.  Pulmonary hypertension in left heart disease.

Authors:  Pratishtha Mehra; Vimal Mehta; Rishi Sukhija; Anjan K Sinha; Mohit Gupta; M P Girish; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 6.  New perspectives by imaging modalities for an old illness: Rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Tuğba Kemaloğlu Öz; Özge Özden Tok; Leyla Elif Sade
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Reference Values for Physical Stress Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Patients after Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors:  Rosemarijn Jansen; Kim Urgel; Maarten J Cramer; Egidius E H L van Aarnhem; Peter P M Zwetsloot; Pieter A Doevendans; Jolanda Kluin; Steven A J Chamuleau
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-02-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.