| Literature DB >> 29515260 |
Brian B Beard1, Wolfgang Kainz1, Teruo Onishi2, Takahiro Iyama2, Soichi Watanabe3, Osamu Fujiwara4, Jianqing Wang4, Giorgi Bit-Babik5, Antonio Faraone5, Joe Wiart6, Andreas Christ7, Niels Kuster7, Ae-Kyoung Lee8, Hugo Kroeze9, Martin Siegbahn10, Jafar Keshvari11, Houman Abrishamkar12, Winfried Simon13, Dirk Manteuffel13, Neviana Nikoloski7.
Abstract
The specific absorption rates (SAR) determined computationally in the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) and anatomically correct models of the human head when exposed to a mobile phone model are compared as part of a study organized by IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 34, SubCommittee 2, and Working Group 2, and carried out by an international task force comprising 14 government, academic, and industrial research institutions. The detailed study protocol defined the computational head and mobile phone models. The participants used different finite-difference time-domain software and independently positioned the mobile phone and head models in accordance with the protocol. The results show that when the pinna SAR is calculated separately from the head SAR, SAM produced a higher SAR in the head than the anatomically correct head models. Also the larger (adult) head produced a statistically significant higher peak SAR for both the 1- and 10-g averages than did the smaller (child) head for all conditions of frequency and position.Entities:
Keywords: FDTD methods; IEEE standards; phantom; simulation; software standards; specific absorption rate (SAR); specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM)
Year: 2006 PMID: 29515260 PMCID: PMC5837060 DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2006.873870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat ISSN: 0018-9375 Impact factor: 2.006