Literature DB >> 15083675

Comparison of FDTD-calculated specific absorption rate in adults and children when using a mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz.

M Martínez-Búrdalo1, A Martín, M Anguiano, R Villar.   

Abstract

In this paper, the specific absorption rate (SAR) in scaled human head models is analysed to study possible differences between SAR in the heads of adults and children and for assessment of compliance with the international safety guidelines, while using a mobile phone. The finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD) has been used for calculating SAR values for models of both children and adults, at 900 and 1800 MHz. Maximum 1 g averaged SAR (SAR1 g) and maximum 10 g averaged SAR (SAR10 g) have been calculated in adults and scaled head models for comparison and assessment of compliance with ANSI/IEEE and European guidelines. Results show that peak SAR1 g and peak SAR10 g all trend downwards with decreasing head size but as head size decreases, the percentage of energy absorbed in the brain increases. So, higher SAR in children's brains can be expected depending on whether the thickness of their skulls and surrounding tissues actually depends on age. The SAR in eyes of different sizes, as a critical organ, has also been studied and very similar distributions for the full size and the scaled models have been obtained. Standard limits can only be exceeded in the unpractical situation where the antenna is located at a very short distance in front of the eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15083675     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/2/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Andreas Christ; Tocher Kellom; Seth Seidman; Neviana Nikoloski; Brian Beard; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparisons of Computed Mobile Phone Induced SAR in the SAM Phantom to That in Anatomically Correct Models of the Human Head.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz; Teruo Onishi; Takahiro Iyama; Soichi Watanabe; Osamu Fujiwara; Jianqing Wang; Giorgi Bit-Babik; Antonio Faraone; Joe Wiart; Andreas Christ; Niels Kuster; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hugo Kroeze; Martin Siegbahn; Jafar Keshvari; Houman Abrishamkar; Winfried Simon; Dirk Manteuffel; Neviana Nikoloski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.006

3.  The Preliminary Chronic Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phones on Heart Rate Variability, Cardiac Function, Blood Profiles, and Semen Quality in Healthy Dogs.

Authors:  Van Nhut Khanh Dong; Lalida Tantisuwat; Piyathip Setthawong; Theerawat Tharasanit; Saikaew Sutayatram; Anusak Kijtawornrat
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  Survey on Different Samsung with Nokia Smart Mobile Phones in the Specific Absorption Rate Electrical Field of Head.

Authors:  Yadolah Fakhri; Azim Alinejad; Hassan Keramati; Abotaleb Bay; Moayed Avazpour; Yahya Zandsalimi; Bigard Moradi; Leila Rasouli Amirhajeloo; Maryam Mirzaei
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.