Literature DB >> 9450585

Differences in energy absorption between heads of adults and children in the near field of sources.

F Schönborn1, M Burkhardt, N Kuster.   

Abstract

This paper was motivated by a recent article in which the levels of electromagnetic energy absorbed in the heads of mobile phone users were compared for children and adults at the frequencies of 835 MHz and 1,900 MHz. Significant differences were found, in particular substantially greater absorption in children's heads at 835 MHz. These findings contradict other studies in which no significant changes had been postulated. The clarification of this issue is crucial to the mobile communications industry since current SAR evaluations as required by the FCC are only performed with phantoms based on the heads of adults. In order to investigate the differences in absorption between adults and children due to their differing anatomies, simulations have been performed using head phantoms based on MRI scans of an adult (voxel size 2 x 2 x 1 mm3) and two children (voxel size 2 x 2 x 1.1 mm3) of the ages of 3 and 7 y. Ten different tissue types were distinguished. The differences in absorption were investigated for the frequencies of 900 MHz and 1,800 MHz using 0.45 lambda dipoles instead of actual mobile phones. These well-defined sources simplified the investigation and facilitated the comparison to previously published data obtained from several numerical and experimental studies on phantoms based on adults. All simulations were performed using a commercial code based on the finite integration technique. The results revealed no significant differences in the absorption of electromagnetic radiation in the near field of sources between adults and children. The same conclusion holds when children are approximated as scaled adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9450585     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199802000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  12 in total

1.  Electric and magnetic fields do not modify the biochemical properties of FRTL-5 cells.

Authors:  A Dimida; E Ferrarini; P Agretti; G De Marco; L Grasso; M Martinelli; I Longo; D Giulietti; A Ricci; M Galimberti; B Siervo; G Licitra; F Francia; A Pinchera; P Vitti; M Tonacchera
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Effects of the acute exposure to the electromagnetic field of mobile phones on human auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Cagatay Oysu; Murat Topak; Oner Celik; H Baki Yilmaz; A Asli Sahin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Andreas Christ; Tocher Kellom; Seth Seidman; Neviana Nikoloski; Brian Beard; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Cellular telephone use among primary school children in Germany.

Authors:  Eva Böhler; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Radiofrequency signal affects alpha band in resting electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Rania Ghosn; Lydia Yahia-Cherif; Laurent Hugueville; Antoine Ducorps; Jean-Didier Lemaréchal; György Thuróczy; René de Seze; Brahim Selmaoui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

7.  Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Dardo Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Paul Vaska; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang; Dave Alexoff; Jean Logan; Christopher Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparisons of Computed Mobile Phone Induced SAR in the SAM Phantom to That in Anatomically Correct Models of the Human Head.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz; Teruo Onishi; Takahiro Iyama; Soichi Watanabe; Osamu Fujiwara; Jianqing Wang; Giorgi Bit-Babik; Antonio Faraone; Joe Wiart; Andreas Christ; Niels Kuster; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hugo Kroeze; Martin Siegbahn; Jafar Keshvari; Houman Abrishamkar; Winfried Simon; Dirk Manteuffel; Neviana Nikoloski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.006

9.  Changes in Mice Brain Spontaneous Electrical Activity during Cortical Spreading Depression due to Mobile Phone Radiation.

Authors:  Samera M Sallam; Ehab I Mohamed; Abdel-Fattah B Dawood
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-06

10.  Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.