Literature DB >> 14620057

Comparisons of peak SAR levels in concentric sphere head models of children and adults for irradiation by a dipole at 900 MHz.

Vitas Anderson1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the scale and significance of differences in peak specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the brains of children and adults exposed to radiofrequency emissions from mobile phones. Estimates were obtained by method of multipole analysis of a three layered (scalp/cranium/brain) spherical head exposed to a nearby 0.4 lambda dipole at 900 MHz. A literature review of head parameters that influence SAR induction revealed strong indirect evidence based on total body water content that there are no substantive age-related changes in tissue conductivity after the first year of life. However, it was also found that the thickness of the ear, scalp and cranium do decrease on average with decreasing age, though individual variability within any age group is very high. The model analyses revealed that compared to an average adult, the peak brain 10 g averaged SAR in mean 4, 8, 12 and 16 year olds (yo) is increased by a factor of 1.31, 1.23, 1.15 and 1.07, respectively. However, contrary to the expectations of a recent prominent expert review, the UK Stewart Report, the relatively small scale of these increases does not warrant any special precautionary measures for child mobile phone users since: (a) SAR testing protocols as contained in the CENELEC (2001) standard provide an additional safety margin which ensures that allowable localized SAR limits are not exceeded in the brain; (b) the maximum worst case brain temperature rise (approximately 0.13 to 0.14 degrees C for an average 4 yo) in child users of mobile phones is well within safe levels and normal physiological parameters; and (c) the range of age average increases in children is less than the expected range of variation seen within the adult population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620057     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/20/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Andreas Christ; Tocher Kellom; Seth Seidman; Neviana Nikoloski; Brian Beard; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  How dangerous are mobile phones, transmission masts, and electricity pylons?

Authors:  A W Wood
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Comparisons of Computed Mobile Phone Induced SAR in the SAM Phantom to That in Anatomically Correct Models of the Human Head.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz; Teruo Onishi; Takahiro Iyama; Soichi Watanabe; Osamu Fujiwara; Jianqing Wang; Giorgi Bit-Babik; Antonio Faraone; Joe Wiart; Andreas Christ; Niels Kuster; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hugo Kroeze; Martin Siegbahn; Jafar Keshvari; Houman Abrishamkar; Winfried Simon; Dirk Manteuffel; Neviana Nikoloski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.006

Review 4.  Cellular phone use and brain tumor: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Kan; Sara E Simonsen; Joseph L Lyon; John R W Kestle
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Airflows around oxygen masks: A potential source of infection?

Authors:  David S Hui; Margaret Ip; Julian W Tang; Alexandra L N Wong; Matthew T V Chan; Stephen D Hall; Paul K S Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models.

Authors:  Brian B Beard; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Airflow and droplet spreading around oxygen masks: a simulation model for infection control research.

Authors:  Margaret Ip; Julian W Tang; David S C Hui; Alexandra L N Wong; Matthew T V Chan; Gavin M Joynt; Albert T P So; Stephen D Hall; Paul K S Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.