Mechanical properties of the periosteum in the pig, Sus scrofa.

The fibrous periosteum forms an intermediary between muscle and ligament forces and the underlying osteoblastic tissue, thus the mechanical properties of the periosteum are critical to understanding osteogenic stimuli. Regional and directional variation in periosteal properties may contribute to the biomechanical regulation of growth in some bones. Periostea of the pig mandibular body, zygomatic arch and metacarpal were loaded to failure under continuous tension. Each tissue type was tested in both the long-axis and transverse orientation. Stiffness, peak stress and peak strain were compared between orientations and among regions. Within the zygomatic periosteum there was little indication of regional difference, and neither zygomatic nor mandibular periosteum showed directional differences. The metacarpal periosteum showed a directional effect only in peak strain, which was greater longitudinally than transversely. There were striking differences, however, among the periostea of the three bones. The zygomatic arch periosteum was the stiffest tissue (91.7+/-30.5 MPa) and showed the highest strength (12.3+/-4.6 MPa). The metacarpal periosteum demonstrated slightly lower stiffness and strength (84.7+/-35.1 and 11.3+/-5.3 MPa), and peak strains in zygomatic and metacarpal periostea were similarly high (17.7+/-3.7 and 17.9+/-3.7 MPa, respectively). The periosteum of the mandibular body was the most deformable tissue (63.0+/-25.4 MPa), with the lowest-peak strain (15.6+/-3.0 MPa) and the least strength (8.2+/-4.1 MPa). These results correspond with those of previous work in long bones, in that periosteum interfacing with ligament or muscle (e.g. zygomatic, metacarpal) demonstrates greater stiffness and strength than periosteum adjacent to loose connective tissue (e.g. mandibular body). Therefore, the degree to which the periosteal tissue serves as a functional interface between bone and muscle is reflected in the different failure properties of periostea from different bones. The structural fortification of the zygomatic arch periosteum relative to other periosteal tissues suggests a role for the periosteum in stabilizing the zygomatic arch-muscle functional complex. On the other hand, the similar failure properties of zygomatic and squamosal periostea from the zygomatic arch mean that the differential growth of these bones cannot be attributed to mechanical stimuli intrinsic to the periosteal tissue.