Literature DB >> 35726029

Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Emmanouil Liodakis1,2, Vassilis P Giannoudis3, Stephan Sehmisch4, Animesh Jha5, Peter V Giannoudis3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High clinical success rates have been reported with the Masquelet technique in the treatment of traumatic bone loss. An increasing number of studies suggest that various factors can influence the properties of induced membranes. Goal of this systematic review is to answer the following questions: (1) which are the ideal spacer properties (material, surface topography, antibiotic supplementation) to booster the quality and osteogenic potential of induced membranes? (2) what is the ideal time to perform the second-stage operation?
METHODS: A systematic search using the keywords "((Masquelet) OR (Induced Periosteum)) AND ((Spacer) OR (Time))" was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published up to the 23rd of February 2022 were included and assessed independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: Thirteen animal and 1 clinical studies were identified to address the above questions. Spacer materials used were PMMA, silicone, titanium, polypropylene, PVA, PCL and calcium sulfate. With the exception of PVA sponges, all solid materials could induce membranes. Low union rates have been reported with titanium and rough surfaced spacers. Scraping of the inner surface of the IM also increased bony union rates. In terms of the ideal timing to perform the second-stage evidence suggests that membranes older than 8 weeks continue to have regenerative capacities similar to younger ones.
CONCLUSION: Membranes induced by smooth PMMA spacers loaded with low concentrations of antibiotics showed powerful osteogenic properties. Other materials such as Polypropylene or Calcium sulfate can also be used with good results. Despite current recommendation to perform the second stage operation in 4-8 weeks, membranes older than 8 weeks seem to have similar regenerative capacities to younger ones.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defect; Cement spacer; Induced membrane; Masquelet technique; Open fractures

Year:  2022        PMID: 35726029     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  42 in total

1.  [Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft].

Authors:  A C Masquelet; F Fitoussi; T Begue; G P Muller
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.660

2.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Biomaterial-Stabilized Soft Tissue Healing for Healing of Critical-Sized Bone Defects: the Masquelet Technique.

Authors:  Magdalena Tarchala; Edward J Harvey; Jake Barralet
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Establishment and characterization of the Masquelet induced membrane technique in a rat femur critical-sized defect model.

Authors:  D Henrich; C Seebach; C Nau; S Basan; B Relja; K Wilhelm; A Schaible; J Frank; J Barker; I Marzi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  [Replacement of defects of long tubular bones by means of one of their fragments].

Authors:  G A Ilizarov; V I Lediaev
Journal:  Vestn Khir Im I I Grek       Date:  1969-06

6.  Tubular open-porous β-tricalcium phosphate polycaprolactone scaffolds as guiding structure for segmental bone defect regeneration in a novel sheep model.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Pobloth; Hanna Schell; Ansgar Petersen; Katleen Beierlein; Christian Kleber; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.963

7.  Intramedullary Nails Yield Superior Results Compared With Plate Fixation When Using the Masquelet Technique in the Femur and Tibia.

Authors:  Michael P Morwood; Benjamin D Streufert; Amy Bauer; Catherine Olinger; Devon Tobey; Michael Beebe; Frank Avilucea; Andres R Buitrago; Cory Collinge; Roy Sanders; Hassan Mir
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases.

Authors:  Paul R Stafford; Brent L Norris
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Reconstruction of Long Bone Infections Using the Induced Membrane Technique: Tips and Tricks.

Authors:  Cyril Mauffrey; Mark E Hake; Vivek Chadayammuri; Alain-Charles Masquelet
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Similarities between induced membrane and amniotic membrane: Novelty for bone repair.

Authors:  Florelle Gindraux; Thomas Rondot; Benoit de Billy; Narcisse Zwetyenga; Jean-Christophe Fricain; Aurélie Pagnon; Laurent Obert
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.