Literature DB >> 12168171

Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.

William Macaulay1, Christopher W DiGiovanni, Andres Restrepo, Khaled J Saleh, Heather Walsh, Lawrence S Crossett, Margaret G E Peterson, Stephen Li, Eduardo A Salvati.   

Abstract

The mean pore size and percent porosity of vacuum-mixed cement were compared with centrifuged cement and cement hand mixed by skilled specialized operating room technicians. Centrifuged cement samples had the smallest mean pore size when compared with vacuum-mixed specimens. The mean pore size for the hand-mixed specimens was intermediate and not significantly different from the other 2 mixing techniques. Results were reversed, however, for mean percent porosity. Centrifuged cement had the highest percent porosity; vacuum-mixed cement, the lowest; and hand-mixed cement, intermediate. The porosity of vacuum-mixed Simplex P (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) bone-cement was similar from the initial to the remnant cement extruded from the cement gun. There was no reduced cement porosity with vacuum mixing or centrifugation as anticipated. Reversion to hand mixing by highly skilled technicians could result in a significant cost savings without negative effects on cement porosity. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12168171     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.32693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of a three-dimensional measurement technique for the porosity evaluation of PMMA bone cement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Cox; Ruth K Wilcox; Martin C Levesley; Richard M Hall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of hand packing versus cement gun pressurization on cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kopec; Joseph C Milbrandt; Todd Duellman; Doug Mangan; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.

Authors:  K J Messick; M A Miller; L A Damron; A Race; M T Clarke; K A Mann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

4.  Masquelet technique: The effect of altering implant material and topography on membrane matrix composition, mechanical and barrier properties in a rat defect model.

Authors:  Natalie Gaio; Alice Martino; Zacharie Toth; J Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Jonathon M Struemph; Alexander C M Chong; Paul H Wooley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

6.  How Much Bone Cement Is Utilized for Component Fixation in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bhava R J Satish; Mohan Thadi; Subbiahgounder Thirumalaisamy; Apsingi Sunil; Praveen L Basanagoudar; Bernard Leo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-09

7.  Bone cement solidifiliation influence the limb alignment and gap balance during TKA.

Authors:  Dongquan Shi; Xingquan Xu; Anyun Guo; Jin Dai; Zhihong Xu; Dongyang Chen; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Characterisation of a novel poly (ether ether ketone)/calcium sulphate composite for bone augmentation.

Authors:  Erik A B Hughes; Liam M Grover
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2017-05-19

9.  How do porosity-inducing techniques affect antibiotic elution from bone cement? An in vitro comparison between hydrogen peroxide and a mechanical mixer.

Authors:  K Shiramizu; V Lovric; A Leung; W R Walsh
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-03-13

10.  Mechanical Properties and Porosity of Acrylic Cement Bone Loaded with Alendronate Powder.

Authors:  Guo-Xin Qu; Zhi-Min Ying; Chen-Chen Zhao; Shi-Gui Yan; Xun-Zi Cai
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.