Literature DB >> 78830

Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships.

T W Picton, D L Woods, G B Proulx.   

Abstract

The auditory sustained potential recorded from the human scalp increases in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity. At rapid rates of stimulus presentation its amplitude decreases but proportionately less so than the amplitude of the transient onset auditory evoked potential. The frequency specificity of this rate effect is complex, suggesting that there may be two underlying components of the scalp-recorded auditory sustained potential. The amplitude of the auditory sustained potential is smaller when the tonal frequency of the stimulus is higher. With prolonged stimulus durations there is some adaptation of the amplitude of the auditory sustained potential. This potential is larger in amplitude when sounds are presented binaurally than monaurally, and has a symmetrical coronal scalp distribution that is unaffected by the ear of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 78830     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  31 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  BOLD responses in human auditory cortex are more closely related to transient MEG responses than to sustained ones.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations.

Authors:  M D Evstigneeva; A A Aleksandrov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

6.  Alpha power indexes task-related networks on large and small scales: A multimodal ECoG study in humans and a non-human primate.

Authors:  A de Pesters; W G Coon; P Brunner; A Gunduz; A L Ritaccio; N M Brunet; P de Weerd; M J Roberts; R Oostenveld; P Fries; G Schalk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Elisa Kim Fromboluti; J Devin McAuley; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spectral vs. temporal auditory processing in specific language impairment: a developmental ERP study.

Authors:  R Ceponiene; A Cummings; B Wulfeck; A Ballantyne; J Townsend
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Interaction between attention and bottom-up saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Juanjuan Xiang; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Aurelie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.