Literature DB >> 29507491

Completing the cervical screening pathway: Factors that facilitate the increase of self-collection uptake among under-screened and never-screened women, an Australian pilot study.

E McLachlan1, S Anderson2, D Hawkes3, M Saville4, K Arabena1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine factors that enhance under-screened and never-screened women's completion of the self-collection alternative pathway of the Renewed National Cervical Screening Program (ncsp) in Victoria, Australia.
BACKGROUND: With the Australian ncsp changing, starting on 1 December 2017, the Medical Services Advisory Committee (msac) recommended implementing human papillomavirus (hpv) testing using a self-collected sample for under-screened and never-screened populations. In response, a multi-agency group implemented an hpv self-collection pilot project to trial self-collection screening pathways for eligible women.
METHODS: Quantitative data were collected on participation rates and compliance rates with follow-up procedures across three primary health care settings. Forty women who self-collected were interviewed in a semi-structured format, and seven agency staff completed in-depth interviews. Qualitative data were used to identify and understand clinical and personal enablers that assisted women to complete self-collection cervical screening pathways successfully.
RESULTS: Eighty-five per cent (10 women) of participants who tested positive for hpv successfully received their results and completed follow-up procedures as required. Two remaining participants also received hpv-positive results. However, agencies were unable to engage them in follow-up services and procedures. The overall participation rate in screening (self-collection or Pap test) was 85.7% (84 women), with 79 women self-collecting. Qualitative data indicated that clear explanations on self-collection, development of trusting, empathetic relationships with health professionals, and recognition of participants' past experiences were critical to the successful completion of the self-collection pathway. When asked about possible inhibitors to screening and to following up on results and appointments, women cited poor physical and mental health, as well as financial and other structural barriers.
CONCLUSION: A well-implemented process, led by trusted, knowledgeable, and engaged health care professionals who can provide appropriate support and information, can assist under-screened and never-screened women to complete the hpv self-collection pathway successfully.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical screening; cultural and linguistically diverse; hpv self-collection; indigenous; women

Year:  2018        PMID: 29507491      PMCID: PMC5832286          DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  17 in total

1.  Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia.

Authors:  Farhana Sultana; Dallas R English; Julie A Simpson; Kelly T Drennan; Robyn Mullins; Julia M L Brotherton; C David Wrede; Stella Heley; Marion Saville; Dorota M Gertig
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?

Authors:  Robyn Mullins; Katherine Scalzo; Farhana Sultana
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Politics and patriarchy: barriers to health screening for socially disadvantaged women.

Authors:  Kathleen Peters
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.787

4.  Clinician and Patient Acceptability of Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Constance Mao; Shalini L Kulasingam; Hilary K Whitham; Stephen E Hawes; John Lin; Nancy B Kiviat
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Socioeconomic differences in reproductive behaviour.

Authors:  I dos Santos Silva; V Beral
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1997

6.  Exploring women's knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation.

Authors:  L Logan; S McIlfatrick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 7.  Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Freija Verdoodt; Peter J F Snijders; Viola M J Verhoef; Eero Suonio; Lena Dillner; Silvia Minozzi; Cristina Bellisario; Rita Banzi; Fang-Hui Zhao; Peter Hillemanns; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Experiencing racism in health care: the mental health impacts for Victorian Aboriginal communities.

Authors:  Margaret A Kelaher; Angeline S Ferdinand; Yin Paradies
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 9.  Incidence, aetiology, and outcomes of cancer in Indigenous peoples in Australia.

Authors:  Joan Cunningham; Alice R Rumbold; Xiaohua Zhang; John R Condon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Evaluation of scaling-up of HPV self-collection offered by community health workers at home visits to increase screening among socially vulnerable under-screened women in Jujuy Province, Argentina.

Authors:  Silvina Arrossi; Melisa Paolino; Laura Thouyaret; Rosa Laudi; Alicia Campanera
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.

Authors:  Holly Nishimura; Ping Teresa Yeh; Habibat Oguntade; Caitlin E Kennedy; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

2.  Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Sara B Smith; Sarah Temin; Farhana Sultana; Philip Castle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  The experience of under-screened and never-screened participants using clinician-supported self-collection cervical screening within the Australian National Cervical Screening Program.

Authors:  Nicola S Creagh; Claire Zammit; Julia Ml Brotherton; Marion Saville; Tracey McDermott; Claire Nightingale; Margaret Kelaher
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

4.  Under-screened Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women's perspectives on cervical screening.

Authors:  Tamara L Butler; Natasha Lee; Kate Anderson; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.