Literature DB >> 26850941

Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia.

Farhana Sultana1, Dallas R English1,2, Julie A Simpson1, Kelly T Drennan3, Robyn Mullins2, Julia M L Brotherton1,4, C David Wrede5,6, Stella Heley7, Marion Saville6,7, Dorota M Gertig1,3.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether HPV self-sampling increases participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened (not screened in past 5 years) women when compared with a reminder letter for a Pap test. Never- or under-screened Victorian women aged 30-69 years, not pregnant and with no prior hysterectomy were eligible. Within each stratum (never-screened and under-screened), we randomly allocated 7,140 women to self-sampling and 1,020 to Pap test reminders. The self-sampling kit comprised a nylon tipped flocked swab enclosed in a dry plastic tube. The primary outcome was participation, as indicated by returning a swab or undergoing a Pap test; the secondary outcome, for women in the self-sampling arm with a positive HPV test, was undergoing appropriate clinical investigation. The Roche Cobas® 4800 test was used to measure presence of HPV DNA. Participation was higher for the self-sampling arm: 20.3 versus 6.0% for never-screened women (absolute difference 14.4%, 95% CI: 12.6-16.1%, p < 0.001) and 11.5 versus 6.4% for under-screened women (difference 5.1%, 95% CI: 3.4-6.8%, p < 0.001). Of the 1,649 women who returned a swab, 45 (2.7%) were positive for HPV16/18 and 95 (5.8%) were positive for other high-risk HPV types. Within 6 months, 28 (62.2%) women positive for HPV16/18 had colposcopy as recommended and nine (20%) had cytology only. Of women positive for other high-risk HPV types, 78 (82.1%) had a Pap test as recommended. HPV self-sampling improves participation in cervical screening for never- and under-screened women and most women with HPV detected have appropriate clinical investigation.
© 2016 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; RCT; never-screened; self-sampling; under-screened

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26850941     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  28 in total

1.  Implementation considerations using HPV self-collection to reach women under-screened for cervical cancer in high-income settings.

Authors:  H N Pedersen; L W Smith; C Sarai Racey; D Cook; M Krajden; D van Niekerk; G S Ogilvie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kilfoyle; Andrea C Des Marais; Mai Anh Ngo; LaHoma Romocki; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Lisa Rahangdale; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system.

Authors:  Rachel L Winer; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana L Miglioretti; Chris Thayer; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Kilian Kimbel; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  HPV sampling options for cervical cancer screening: preferences of urban-dwelling Canadians in a changing paradigm.

Authors:  G D Datta; M H Mayrand; S Qureshi; N Ferre; L Gauvin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Self-collection for under-screened women in a National Cervical Screening Program: pilot study.

Authors:  M Saville; D Hawkes; E Mclachlan; S Anderson; K Arabena
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Completing the cervical screening pathway: Factors that facilitate the increase of self-collection uptake among under-screened and never-screened women, an Australian pilot study.

Authors:  E McLachlan; S Anderson; D Hawkes; M Saville; K Arabena
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 8.  Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Linda C O'Dwyer; Charlesnika T Evans; Megan McHugh; Lifang Hou; Melissa A Simon; Robert L Murphy; Neil Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders.

Authors:  J U H Lam; K M Elfström; D M Ejegod; H Pedersen; C Rygaard; M Rebolj; E Lynge; K E Juul; S K Kjær; J Dillner; J Bonde
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Self-sampling to improve cervical cancer screening coverage in Switzerland: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Manuela Viviano; Rosa Catarino; Emilien Jeannot; Michel Boulvain; Manuela Undurraga Malinverno; Pierre Vassilakos; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.