Literature DB >> 25312640

Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?

Robyn Mullins1, Katherine Scalzo2, Farhana Sultana3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine which groups of women would be most likely to take part in self-sampling for cervical screening, and what they perceive as the key barriers and benefits to self-sampling.
METHODS: A random sample of 3000 women aged 18-69 in Victoria, Australia, were asked questions about "taking their own Pap test" in a telephone survey about cervical screening; 2526 answered the questions about self-sampling. The terminology "Pap test" was used in questions, due to the very low understanding of HPV and its link to cervical cancer.
RESULTS: One-third of women (34.0%) indicated they would prefer to self-sample, 57.2% would not and 8.7% were unsure. Preference for self-sampling was significantly stronger among women who had not had a Pap test for more than three years (64.8%, p < .001) or who had never had one (62.1%, p < .001), compared with those up-to-date (27.0%). Convenience was a key benefit (37.8%), as was less embarrassment (31.5%). For those who did not want to self-sample or were unsure, key factors included professionals being more skilled (53.4% and 28.2% respectively), and doubts about being able to do it properly (28.9% and 23.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling was most popular among women who needed to have a Pap test, and could potentially reach some women who are not participating appropriately in cervical screening. Key barriers to participation could be addressed by providing information about the test being for HPV, and being easier to do properly than a Pap test.
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; Human papillomavirus; cancer screening; cervical

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312640     DOI: 10.1177/0969141314555247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  14 in total

Review 1.  Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: Focused literature review.

Authors:  Tina R Madzima; Mandana Vahabi; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Ruanne V Barnabas; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Qualitative assessment of attitudes toward cervical cancer (CC) screening and HPV self-sampling among African American (AA) and Sub Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) women.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Adeyimika T Desmennu; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Completing the cervical screening pathway: Factors that facilitate the increase of self-collection uptake among under-screened and never-screened women, an Australian pilot study.

Authors:  E McLachlan; S Anderson; D Hawkes; M Saville; K Arabena
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Comparison of cervical cancer screening by self-sampling papillomavirus test versus pap-smear in underprivileged women in France.

Authors:  Laura Reques; Camille Rolland; Anne Lallemand; Najat Lahmidi; Ezequiel Aranda-Fernández; Antonio Lazzarino; Julie Bottero; Françoise Hamers; Christine Bergeron; Ken Haguenoer; Guy Launoy; Niklas Luhmann
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Self-collected Pap smears may provide an acceptable and effective method of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Amita A Singla; Paul Komesaroff
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-06

7.  Knowledge, attitude and practice of female university students regarding human papillomavirus and self-sampling in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Miracle Tamaraebi Eche; Kerry Vermaak
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Transformation of the genital epithelial tract occurs early in California sea lion development.

Authors:  Cecilia Barragán-Vargas; Jorge Montano-Frías; Germán Ávila Rosales; Carlos R Godínez-Reyes; Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Women's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  Farhana Sultana; Robyn Mullins; Dallas R English; Julie A Simpson; Kelly T Drennan; Stella Heley; C David Wrede; Julia M L Brotherton; Marion Saville; Dorota M Gertig
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.