Literature DB >> 9353670

Socioeconomic differences in reproductive behaviour.

I dos Santos Silva1, V Beral.   

Abstract

There are marked socioeconomic variations in the risk of female reproductive cancers. We examine here data from the World Fertility Surveys, the Demographic and Health Surveys, and other national surveys, to assess whether these variations in cancer risk might be explained, at least in part, by socioeconomic variations in reproductive behaviour. There were marked socioeconomic differentials in achieved parity, age at first birth, final childlessness, duration of breastfeeding, and possibly also age at menopause. These differentials were present in almost all settings: countries with low and high levels of modernization, and countries with low and high levels of fertility. In general, women of higher socioeconomic status and with more education had lower fertility and later age at first birth, but a greater prevalence of childlessness, shorter duration of breastfeeding and later age at menopause. However, the size and even the direction of these differentials varied markedly from country to country according to its level of economic development and, within each country, from generation to generation of women. It is possible that some of these socioeconomic differences may be narrowing in recent generations in Western countries. There was little evidence of socioeconomic variations in age at menarche. The observed socioeconomic differentials in most aspects of reproductive behaviour could potentially account for some of the socioeconomic variation in the risk of female reproductive cancers. However, this relationship could not be assessed directly because such analysis would require birth-cohort-specific data on socioeconomic variations in reproductive behaviour and in cancer risks. Unfortunately, these data are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IARC Sci Publ        ISSN: 0300-5038


  14 in total

1.  Variations in reproductive events across life: a pooled analysis of data from 505 147 women across 10 countries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Socio-Demographic, Reproductive and Clinical Profile of Women Diagnosed with Advanced Cervical Cancer in a Tertiary Care Institute of Delhi.

Authors:  Neha Dahiya; Damodar Bachani; Anita S Acharya; D N Sharma; Subhash Gupta; K P Haresh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-06-13

3.  Participation rates in cervical cancer screening: experience in rural Northern Greece.

Authors:  A Vakfari; M Gavana; S Giannakopoulos; E Smyrnakis; A Benos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Predicting pregnancy from pregnancy intentions: prospective findings from the Central Pennsylvania Womens's Heath Study (CePAWHS).

Authors:  Cynthia H Chuang; Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Fabian T Camacho; Anne-Marie Dyer
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  Completing the cervical screening pathway: Factors that facilitate the increase of self-collection uptake among under-screened and never-screened women, an Australian pilot study.

Authors:  E McLachlan; S Anderson; D Hawkes; M Saville; K Arabena
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Shanita D Williams; Mohammad Siahpush; Aaron Mulhollen
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-14

7.  Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996.

Authors:  G Menvielle; A Leclerc; J-F Chastang; D Luce
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Temporal trends of main reproductive characteristics in ten urban and rural regions of China: the China Kadoorie biobank study of 300 000 women.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; LiMing Li; Serini Murugasen; Lai-san Hong; Ling Yang; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Rory Collins; Junshi Chen; Hui He; Ming Wu; Tianyou He; Xiaolan Ren; Jinhuai Meng; Richard Peto; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Socio-economic inequalities in the incidence of four common cancers: a population-based registry study.

Authors:  E J Tweed; G M Allardice; P McLoone; D S Morrison
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Municipal distribution of breast cancer mortality among women in Spain.

Authors:  Marina Pollán; Rebeca Ramis; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Diana Gómez; Virginia Lope; Javier García-Pérez; Jose Miguel Carrasco; Maria José García-Mendizábal; Gonzalo López-Abente
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.