Literature DB >> 29506446

Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance.

Brian P Lewis1, Darwyn E Linder2.   

Abstract

When pressure to perform is increased, individuals commonly perform worse than if there were no pressure ("choking under pressure'). Two mechanisms have been proposed to account for this effect-distraction (cognitive load), wherein pressure distracts attention from the task, and self focus, wherein attention shifts inward interfering with performance. To distinguish between these two competing explanations, the current experiment manipulated pressure by offering performance-contingent rewards. For half the participants, cognitive load was increased by requiring participants to count backward from 100. Additionally, adaptation to self awareness was manipulated by videotaping half the participants during practice trials. Results show that pressure caused choking when participants were not distracted and had not been adapted to self awareness. This effect was attenuated when cognitive load was increased or when self-awareness adaptation had occurred. These results support self focus mediated misregulation as the mechanism for choking and disconfirm the distraction hypothesis.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 29506446     DOI: 10.1177/0146167297239003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  14 in total

1.  Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure.

Authors:  Taraz G Lee; Daniel E Acuña; Konrad P Kording; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Inhibition of vection by grasping an object.

Authors:  Masaki Mori; Takeharu Seno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The impact of dynamic status changes within competitive rank-ordered hierarchies.

Authors:  Hemant Kakkar; Niro Sivanathan; Nathan C Pettit
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Out of control: diminished prefrontal activity coincides with impaired motor performance due to choking under pressure.

Authors:  Taraz G Lee; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Who Chokes Under Pressure? The Big Five Personality Traits and Decision-Making under Pressure.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; Crina D Silasi-Mansat; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2014-10-23

6.  Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives.

Authors:  Simon Dunne; Vikram S Chib; Joseph Berleant; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Is pressure stressful? The impact of pressure on the stress response and category learning.

Authors:  Shannon K McCoy; Steven Hutchinson; Lauren Hawthorne; Brandon J Cosley; Shawn W Ell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Effects of tolcapone and bromocriptine on cognitive stability and flexibility.

Authors:  Ian G M Cameron; Deanna L Wallace; Ahmad Al-Zughoul; Andrew S Kayser; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Choking under the pressure of competition: A complete statistical investigation of pressure kicks in the NFL, 2000-2017.

Authors:  Nai-Wei Hsu; Kai-Shuo Liu; Shun-Chuan Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of acute exercise and psychosocial stress on fine motor skills and testosterone concentration in the saliva of high school students.

Authors:  Mirko Wegner; Johan M Koedijker; Henning Budde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.