Literature DB >> 24129964

Is pressure stressful? The impact of pressure on the stress response and category learning.

Shannon K McCoy1, Steven Hutchinson, Lauren Hawthorne, Brandon J Cosley, Shawn W Ell.   

Abstract

We examined the basic question of whether pressure is stressful. We proposed that when examining the role of stress or pressure in cognitive performance, it is important to consider the type of pressure, the stress response, and the aspect of cognition assessed. In Experiment 1, outcome pressure was not experienced as stressful but did lead to impaired performance on a rule-based (RB) category-learning task, but not on a more procedural information-integration (II) task. In Experiment 2, the addition of monitoring pressure resulted in a modest stress response to combined pressure and impairment on both tasks. Across experiments, higher stress appraisals were associated with decreased performance on the RB, but not on the II, task. In turn, higher stress reactivity (i.e., heart rate) was associated with enhanced performance on the II, but not on the RB, task. This work represents an initial step toward integrating the stress cognition and pressure cognition literatures and suggests that integrating these fields may require consideration of the type of pressure, the stress response, and the cognitive system mediating performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24129964     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0215-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  36 in total

1.  Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Kelli D Hejl; A David Ing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Arousal and physiological toughness: implications for mental and physical health.

Authors:  R A Dienstbier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure.

Authors:  Marci S DeCaro; Robin D Thomas; Neil B Albert; Sian L Beilock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08

5.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance.

Authors:  Brian P Lewis; Darwyn E Linder
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-09

7.  Stress modulates the engagement of multiple memory systems in classification learning.

Authors:  Lars Schwabe; Oliver T Wolf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Decisions under distress: stress profiles influence anchoring and adjustment.

Authors:  Karim S Kassam; Katrina Koslov; Wendy Berry Mendes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10-14

9.  Choking and excelling under pressure in experienced classifiers.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  The neuro-symphony of stress.

Authors:  Marian Joëls; Tallie Z Baram
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  2 in total

1.  Performance Pressure Enhances Speech Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Seth Koslov; Han-Gyol Yi; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2015-12-23

2.  A difficulty predictor for perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.