Literature DB >> 25449744

Out of control: diminished prefrontal activity coincides with impaired motor performance due to choking under pressure.

Taraz G Lee1, Scott T Grafton2.   

Abstract

There are three non-exclusive theoretical explanations for the paradoxical collapse of performance due to large financial incentives. It has been proposed that "choking under pressure" is either due to distraction, interference via an increase in top-down control and performance monitoring, or excessive levels of arousal in the face of large losses. Given the known neural architecture involved in executive control and reward, we used fMRI of human participants during incentivized motor performance to provide evidence to support and/or reconcile these competing models in a visuomotor task. We show that the execution of a pre-trained motor task during neuroimaging is impaired by high rewards. BOLD activity occurring prior to movement onset is increased in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and functional connectivity between this region and motor cortex is likewise increased just prior to choking. However, the extent of this increase in functional connectivity is inversely related to a participant's propensity to choke, suggesting that a failure in exerting top-down influence on motor control underlies choking under pressure due to large incentives. These results are consistent with a distraction account of choking and suggest that frontal influences on motor activity are necessary to protect performance from vulnerability under pressure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25449744      PMCID: PMC4262628          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory?

Authors:  J B Rowe; I Toni; O Josephs; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems.

Authors:  R Elliott; K J Friston; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure?

Authors:  S L Beilock; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

5.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory.

Authors:  K Sakai; J B Rowe; R E Passingham
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks.

Authors:  R T Knight; W R Staines; D Swick; L L Chao
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

7.  Attention to action: specific modulation of corticocortical interactions in humans.

Authors:  James Rowe; Karl Friston; Richard Frackowiak; Richard Passingham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI.

Authors:  André J Szameitat; Torsten Schubert; Karsten Müller; D Yves Von Cramon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.

Authors:  J A EASTERBROOK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using M-sequences.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buracas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  13 in total

1.  Right prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation enhances multi-day savings in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Brittany S Gluskin; Brian Greeley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure.

Authors:  Taraz G Lee; Daniel E Acuña; Konrad P Kording; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Reward-Driven Arousal Impacts Preparation to Perform a Task via Amygdala-Caudate Mechanisms.

Authors:  Noriya Watanabe; Jamil P Bhanji; Hideki Ohira; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives.

Authors:  Simon Dunne; Vikram S Chib; Joseph Berleant; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Learning, Reward, and Decision Making.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty; Jeffrey Cockburn; Wolfgang M Pauli
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Dopamine and Proximity in Motivation and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Toward a neurobiological model of human performance under pressure.

Authors:  Abraham Saikley; Keren Haroush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Heuristics contribute to sensorimotor decision-making under risk.

Authors:  Tyler Adkins; Richard Lewis; Taraz Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 9.  Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The influence of rewards on incidental memory: more does not mean better.

Authors:  Si Cheng; Ting Jiang; Jingming Xue; Songxue Wang; Chuansheng Chen; Mingxia Zhang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.