Literature DB >> 30481355

Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives.

Simon Dunne1, Vikram S Chib2,3, Joseph Berleant1, John P O'Doherty1,2.   

Abstract

It has been observed that the performing for high stakes can, paradoxically, lead to uncharacteristically poor performance. Here we investigate a novel approach to attenuating such 'choking under pressure' by instructing participants performing a demanding motor task that rewards successful performance with a monetary gain, to reappraise this incentive as a monetary loss for unsuccessful performance. We show that when participants applied this simple strategy, choking was significantly reduced. This strategy also influenced participants' neural and physiological activity. When participants reappraised the incentive as a potential monetary loss, the representation of the magnitude of the incentive in the ventral striatum Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was attenuated. In addition, individual differences in the degree of attenuation of the neural response to incentive predicted the effectiveness of the reappraisal strategy in reducing choking. Furthermore, participants' skin conductance changed in proportion to the magnitude of the incentive being played for, and was exaggerated on high incentive trials on which participants failed. Reappraisal of the incentive abolished this exaggerated skin conductance response. This represents the first experimental association of sympathetic arousal with choking. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of the incentive is indeed a promising intervention for attenuating choking under pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30481355      PMCID: PMC6318472          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  37 in total

1.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion.

Authors:  Kevin N Ochsner; Rebecca D Ray; Jeffrey C Cooper; Elaine R Robertson; Sita Chopra; John D E Gabrieli; James J Gross
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Thomas L Webb; Eleanor Miles; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Coping under pressure: employing emotion regulation strategies to enhance performance under pressure.

Authors:  Yannick A Balk; Marieke A Adriaanse; Denise T D de Ridder; Catharine Evers
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.016

6.  Reward-Driven Arousal Impacts Preparation to Perform a Task via Amygdala-Caudate Mechanisms.

Authors:  Noriya Watanabe; Jamil P Bhanji; Hideki Ohira; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cognitive reappraisal of negative affect: converging evidence from EMG and self-report.

Authors:  Rebecca D Ray; Kateri McRae; Kevin N Ochsner; James J Gross
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-08

Review 8.  Model-based analysis of skin conductance responses: Towards causal models in psychophysiology.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI.

Authors:  S Konishi; K Nakajima; I Uchida; H Kikyo; M Kameyama; Y Miyashita
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Differential encoding of losses and gains in the human striatum.

Authors:  Ben Seymour; Nathaniel Daw; Peter Dayan; Tania Singer; Ray Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors of choking under pressure in musicians.

Authors:  Shinichi Furuya; Reiko Ishimaru; Noriko Nagata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.