Literature DB >> 29498000

Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.

Irina A Tikhonova1, Nicola Huxley2, Tristan Snowsill3, Louise Crathorne4, Jo Varley-Campbell3, Mark Napier5, Martin Hoyle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combination therapies with cetuximab (Erbitux®; Merck Serono UK Ltd) and panitumumab (Vectibix®; Amgen UK Ltd) are shown to be less effective in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who have mutations in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS oncogenes from the rat sarcoma (RAS) family.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of these drugs in patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type (i.e. non-mutated) metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective.
METHODS: We constructed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the long-term costs and benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab combined with either FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) vs. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI alone. The economic analysis was based on three randomised controlled trials. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5% per annum.
RESULTS: Based on the evidence available, both drugs fulfil the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's end-of-life criteria. In the analysis, assuming discount prices for the drugs from patient access schemes agreed by the drug manufacturers with the Department of Health, predicted mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cetuximab + FOLFOX, panitumumab + FOLFOX and cetuximab + FOLFIRI compared with chemotherapy alone appeared cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold of £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments.
CONCLUSION: Cetuximab and panitumumab were recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, for use within the National Health Service in England. Both treatments are available via the UK Cancer Drugs Fund.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29498000     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0630-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  21 in total

1.  PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Fernando Rivera; Meinolf Karthaus; Gianpiero Fasola; Jean-Luc Canon; J Randolph Hecht; Hua Yu; Kelly S Oliner; William Y Go
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Douillard; Kelly S Oliner; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; Gyorgy Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Richard Williams; Alan Rong; Jeffrey Wiezorek; Roger Sidhu; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; C-H Köhne; F Ciardiello; H-J Lenz; V Heinemann; U Klinkhardt; F Beier; K Duecker; J H van Krieken; S Tejpar
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Using health state utility values from the general population to approximate baselines in decision analytic models when condition-specific data are not available.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John E Brazier
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Continuous time simulation and discretized models for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Marta O Soares; Luísa Canto E Castro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; B Nordlinger; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Y Douillard; S Siena; J Cassidy; J Tabernero; R Burkes; M Barugel; Y Humblet; G Bodoky; D Cunningham; J Jassem; F Rivera; I Kocákova; P Ruff; M Błasińska-Morawiec; M Smakal; J L Canon; M Rother; K S Oliner; Y Tian; F Xu; R Sidhu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus.

Authors:  René Adam; Aimery De Gramont; Joan Figueras; Ashley Guthrie; Norihiro Kokudo; Francis Kunstlinger; Evelyne Loyer; Graeme Poston; Philippe Rougier; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alberto Sobrero; Josep Tabernero; Catherine Teh; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-07

Review 9.  Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Julian Downward
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Adjusting survival time estimates to account for treatment switching in randomized controlled trials--an economic evaluation context: methods, limitations, and recommendations.

Authors:  Nicholas R Latimer; Keith R Abrams; Paul C Lambert; Michael J Crowther; Allan J Wailoo; James P Morden; Ron L Akehurst; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Antineoplastic prescription among patients with colorectal cancer in eight major cities of China, 2015-2019: an observational retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Difei Yao; Lingyan Yu; Wei He; Yangmin Hu; Huimin Xu; Ying Yuan; Haibin Dai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the U.S.

Authors:  Dong Ding; Huabin Hu; Yin Shi; Longjiang She; Linli Yao; Youwen Zhu; Shan Zeng; Liangfang Shen; Jin Huang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Qiang Zhang; Jie Sun
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 13.751

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.