Literature DB >> 25937522

FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

C Bokemeyer1, C-H Köhne2, F Ciardiello3, H-J Lenz4, V Heinemann5, U Klinkhardt6, F Beier7, K Duecker8, J H van Krieken9, S Tejpar10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OPUS study demonstrated that addition of cetuximab to 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) significantly improved objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations, a detrimental effect was seen upon addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. The current study reports outcomes in subgroups defined by extended RAS testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Samples from OPUS study KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumours were reanalysed for other RAS mutations in four additional KRAS codons (exons 3-4) and six NRAS codons (exons 2-4) using BEAMing. A cutoff of ⩾5% mutant/wild-type sequences was selected to define RAS status; we also report an analysis using a cutoff based on the technical lower limit for mutation identification (0.1%).
RESULTS: Other RAS mutations were detected in 31/118 (26%) evaluable patients. In the extended analysis of RAS wild-type tumours (n=87), objective response was significantly improved by addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4 (58% versus 29%; odds ratio 3.33 [95% confidence interval 1.36-8.17]; P=0.0084); although limited by population size, there also appeared to be trends favouring the cetuximab arm in terms of PFS and overall survival in the RAS wild-type group compared with the RAS evaluable group. There was no evidence that patients with other RAS mutations benefited from cetuximab, but small numbers precluded precise estimations of treatment effects. In the combined population of patients with any RAS mutation (KRAS exon 2 or other RAS), a clear detrimental effect was associated with addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4.
CONCLUSION: Patients with RAS-mutant mCRC, as defined by mutations in KRAS and NRAS exons 2-4, derive no benefit and may be harmed by the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. Restricting cetuximab administration to patients with RAS wild-type tumours will further tailor therapy to maximise benefit.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cetuximab; FOLFOX4; KRAS; NRAS; OPUS; RAS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25937522     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  84 in total

Review 1.  Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.

Authors:  Lien Tembuyser; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Clinical Utility of Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nakamura; Takayuki Yoshino
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-26

Review 3.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable RAS wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W W L Wong; M Zargar; S R Berry; Y J Ko; M Riesco-Martínez; K K W Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Molecular Landscape and Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Miyamoto; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27

6.  Nasoethmoidal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma Treated with Cetuximab: Role of Liquid Biopsy and BEAMing in Predicting Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy.

Authors:  Santiago Cabezas-Camarero; Virginia de la Orden García; Vanesa García-Barberán; Beatriz Mediero-Valeros; Ahmad Issa Subhi-Issa; Patricia Llovet García; Inmaculada Bando-Polaino; Salomé Merino Menéndez; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-01-02

7.  Impact of Delayed Addition of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies on the Outcome of First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Registry-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Ondrej Fiala; Veronika Veskrnova; Renata Chloupkova; Alexandr Poprach; Igor Kiss; Katerina Kopeckova; Ladislav Dusek; Lubomir Slavicek; Milan Kohoutek; Jindrich Finek; Marek Svoboda; Lubos Petruzelka; Ludmila Boubliková; Josef Dvorak; Bohuslav Melichar; Tomas Buchler
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  A Phase II Efficacy and Safety, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Imprime PGG Injection in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Stage IV KRAS-Mutant Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Neil H Segal; Purvi Gada; Neil Senzer; Michele A Gargano; Myra L Patchen; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 9.  Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marta Schirripa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 10.  Mechanisms of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sforza; Erika Martinelli; Fortunato Ciardiello; Valentina Gambardella; Stefania Napolitano; Giulia Martini; Carminia Della Corte; Claudia Cardone; Marianna L Ferrara; Alfonso Reginelli; Giuseppina Liguori; Giulio Belli; Teresa Troiani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.