Literature DB >> 24718886

Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

J Y Douillard1, S Siena2, J Cassidy3, J Tabernero4, R Burkes5, M Barugel6, Y Humblet7, G Bodoky8, D Cunningham9, J Jassem10, F Rivera11, I Kocákova12, P Ruff13, M Błasińska-Morawiec14, M Smakal15, J L Canon16, M Rother17, K S Oliner18, Y Tian19, F Xu19, R Sidhu20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Panitumumab Randomized trial In combination with chemotherapy for Metastatic colorectal cancer to determine Efficacy (PRIME) demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment of wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the primary end point of the study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to panitumumab 6.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks + FOLFOX4 (arm 1) or FOLFOX4 (arm 2). This prespecified final descriptive analysis of efficacy and safety was planned for 30 months after the last patient was enrolled.
RESULTS: A total of 1183 patients were randomized. Median PFS for WT KRAS mCRC was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.3-11.4 months] for arm 1 and 8.6 months (95% CI 7.5-9.5 months) for arm 2; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95; P = 0.01. Median overall survival (OS) for WT KRAS mCRC was 23.9 months (95% CI 20.3-27.7 months) for arm 1 and 19.7 months (95% CI 17.6-22.7 months) for arm 2; HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.73-1.06; P = 0.17 (68% OS events). An exploratory analysis of updated survival (>80% OS events) was carried out which demonstrated improvement in OS; HR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98; P = 0.03 for WT KRAS mCRC. The adverse event profile was consistent with the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In WT KRAS mCRC, PFS was improved, objective response was higher, and there was a trend toward improved OS with panitumumab-FOLFOX4, with significant improvement in OS observed in an updated analysis of survival in patients with WT KRAS mCRC treated with panitumumab + FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone (P = 0.03). These data support a positive benefit-risk profile for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 for patients with previously untreated WT KRAS mCRC. KRAS testing is critical to select appropriate patients for treatment with panitumumab.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFOX; antibody; chemotherapy; metastatic colorectal cancer; panitumumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24718886     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  183 in total

1.  How Can Next-Generation Sequencing (Genomics) Help Us in Treating Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Stability engineering of anti-EGFR scFv antibodies by rational design of a lambda-to-kappa swap of the VL framework using a structure-guided approach.

Authors:  Andreas Lehmann; Josephine H F Wixted; Maxim V Shapovalov; Heinrich Roder; Roland L Dunbrack; Matthew K Robinson
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Circulating DNA Demonstrates Convergent Evolution and Common Resistance Mechanisms during Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alain R Thierry; Brice Pastor; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Anastasia D Katsiampoura; Christine Parseghian; Jonathan M Loree; Michael J Overman; Cynthia Sanchez; Safia El Messaoudi; Marc Ychou; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Molecular markers predictive of chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Stacey Shiovitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

5.  Tumor Heterogeneity as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alissa Greenbaum; David R Martin; Thèrése Bocklage; Ji-Hyun Lee; Scott A Ness; Ashwani Rajput
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Use of High-Cost Cancer Treatments in Academic and Nonacademic Practice.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell; Alan C Kinlaw; Sharon Peacock-Hinton; Stacie B Dusetzina; Hanna K Sanoff; Jennifer L Lund
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-14

7.  Oxaliplatin rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after prior oxaliplatin treatment.

Authors:  Jae-Joon Kim; Jihoon Kang; Yong Sang Hong; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Sun Young Kim; Tae Won Kim; Jeong Eun Kim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Targeted Therapies in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Gonzalo Tapia Rico; Amanda R Townsend; Vy Broadbridge; Timothy J Price
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Molecular markers of prognosis and therapeutic targets in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Richard A Burkhart; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Postmetastasectomy Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Tien-Hua Chen; Wei-Shone Chen; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Shung-Haur Yang; Huann-Sheng Wang; Shih-Ching Chang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Chun-Chi Lin; Hung-Hsin Lin; Sheng-Chieh Huang; Hou-Hsuan Cheng; Gar-Yang Chau; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Hao-Jan Lei; Shu-Cheng Chou; Yee Chao; Hao-Wei Teng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.