Literature DB >> 32918790

Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the U.S.

Dong Ding1, Huabin Hu2,3, Yin Shi4, Longjiang She1, Linli Yao1, Youwen Zhu1, Shan Zeng1, Liangfang Shen1, Jin Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The data from the phase III clinical trial KEYNOTE-426 indicated that pembrolizumab plus axitinib compared with sunitinib could generate clinical benefits in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Given the incremental clinical benefits, we examined the potential cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in the first-line setting for patients with advanced RCC from the U.S. payers' perspective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost and health outcomes were estimated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 to $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed by varying potentially modifiable parameters, and additional subgroup analyses were performed as well.
RESULTS: Upon our analyses, the total treatment costs in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib and sunitinib groups were $522,796 and $348,424 and the QALYs gained 2.90 and 1.72, respectively. In the base-case analysis, compared with receiving sunitinib, patients with advanced RCC receiving pembrolizumab plus axitinib gained 1.18 more QALYs at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $148,676/QALY. The results of subgroup analyses demonstrated that pembrolizumab plus axitinib was most cost-effective for patients who had one organ with metastasis.
CONCLUSION: First-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib, compared with sunitinib, is a cost-effective strategy when the value of WTP is from $100,000 to $150,000 per QALY in patients with advanced RCC. For patients with one-organ metastasis and those in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor risk group, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib is more cost-effective than others. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This was the first study to examine the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study found that first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib is a cost-effective strategy when the value of willingness-to-pay is from $100,000 to $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year in patients with advanced RCC from the U.S. payers' perspective. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axitinib; Cost-effectiveness; Pembrolizumab; Renal cell carcinoma; Sunitinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918790      PMCID: PMC7873332          DOI: 10.1002/ONCO.13522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159            Impact factor:   5.837


  41 in total

Review 1.  Renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Herbert T Cohen; Francis J McGovern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

Authors:  B Escudier; C Porta; M Schmidinger; N Rioux-Leclercq; A Bex; V Khoo; V Grünwald; S Gillessen; A Horwich
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  The cost-effectiveness of alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib.

Authors:  J J Carlson; W Canestaro; A Ravelo; W Wong
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Thomas Powles; Michael B Atkins; Bernard Escudier; David F McDermott; Cristina Suarez; Sergio Bracarda; Walter M Stadler; Frede Donskov; Jae Lyun Lee; Robert Hawkins; Alain Ravaud; Boris Alekseev; Michael Staehler; Motohide Uemura; Ugo De Giorgi; Begoña Mellado; Camillo Porta; Bohuslav Melichar; Howard Gurney; Jens Bedke; Toni K Choueiri; Francis Parnis; Tarik Khaznadar; Alpa Thobhani; Shi Li; Elisabeth Piault-Louis; Gretchen Frantz; Mahrukh Huseni; Christina Schiff; Marjorie C Green; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Erlotinib, Afatinib, and Cisplatin-Pemetrexed for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Jie Ting; PharmD Tien Ho; Pin Xiang; Amanda Sugay; Maher Abdel-Sattar; Leslie Wilson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Nizar M Tannir; David F McDermott; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Bohuslav Melichar; Toni K Choueiri; Elizabeth R Plimack; Philippe Barthélémy; Camillo Porta; Saby George; Thomas Powles; Frede Donskov; Victoria Neiman; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Pamela Salman; Howard Gurney; Robert Hawkins; Alain Ravaud; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Sergio Bracarda; Carlos H Barrios; Yoshihiko Tomita; Daniel Castellano; Brian I Rini; Allen C Chen; Sabeen Mekan; M Brent McHenry; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Justin Doan; Padmanee Sharma; Hans J Hammers; Bernard Escudier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Daniel A Goldstein; Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; David H Howard; Joseph Lipscomb; Bassel F El-Rayes; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib in First-line Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in China.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Gaoyun Hu; Zhuo Chen; Xiaomin Wan; Chongqing Tan; Xiaohui Zeng; Zeneng Cheng
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Cost-effectiveness of temsirolimus for first line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Martin Hoyle; Colin Green; Jo Thompson-Coon; Zulian Liu; Karen Welch; Tiffany Moxham; Ken Stein
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Qiang Zhang; Jie Sun
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Youwen Zhu; Kun Liu; Dong Ding; Yangying Zhou; Libo Peng
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.070

Review 2.  A State-of-the-Art Roadmap for Biomarker-Driven Drug Development in the Era of Personalized Therapies.

Authors:  Victoria Serelli-Lee; Kazumi Ito; Akira Koibuchi; Takahiko Tanigawa; Takayo Ueno; Nobuko Matsushima; Yasuhiko Imai
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Pazopanib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single-center, real-world, retrospective Chinese study.

Authors:  Jianhui Chen; Wen Ye; Wei Jiang; Xiaofan Li; Rong Liu; Bijuan Lin; Jingnan Xiang; Wei Tian; Junjie Bai; Teng Zuo; Bingxin Lin; Yinan Guo; Song Zheng
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

4.  Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for American patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zhuo-Miao Ye; Zi-Qing Tang; Zhe Xu; Qin Zhou; Huan Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A Markov analysis.

Authors:  Sarah A Ackroyd; Elbert S Huang; Katherine C Kurnit; Nita K Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 5.482

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.