Literature DB >> 29490373

Patient Preferences for Follow-up After Recent Excision of a Localized Melanoma.

Wei-Yin Lim1,2, Rachael L Morton3, Robin M Turner4, Marisa C Jenkins2, Pascale Guitera5,6,7, Les Irwig2, Angela C Webster2, Mbathio Dieng2,3, Robyn P M Saw5,8,9, Donald Low10, Cynthia Low10, Katy J L Bell2,11.   

Abstract

Importance: The standard model of follow-up posttreatment of localized melanoma relies on clinician detection of recurrent or new melanoma, through routinely scheduled clinics (clinician-led surveillance). An alternative model is to increase reliance on patient detection of melanoma, with fewer scheduled visits and increased support for patients' skin self-examination (SSE) (eg, using smartphone apps to instruct, prompt and record SSE, and facilitate teledermatology; patient-led surveillance). Objective: To determine the proportion of adults treated for localized melanoma who prefer the standard scheduled visit frequency (as per Australian guideline recommendations) or fewer scheduled visits (adapted from the Melanoma Follow-up [MELFO] study of reduced follow-up). Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used a telephone interview for surveillance following excision of localized melanoma at an Australian specialist center. We invited a random sample of 400 patients who had completed treatment for localized melanoma in 2014 to participate. They were asked about their preferences for scheduled follow-up, and experience of follow-up in the past 12 months. Those with a recurrent or new primary melanoma diagnosed by the time of interview (0.8-1.7 years since first diagnosis) were asked about how it was first detected and treated. SSE practices were also assessed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion preferring standard vs fewer scheduled clinic visits, median delay between detection and treatment of recurrent or new primary melanoma, and SSE practices.
Results: Of the 262 people who agreed to be interviewed, the mean (SD) age was 64.3 (14.3) years, and 93 (36%) were women. Among the 230 people who did not have a recurrent or new primary melanoma, 149 vs 81 preferred the standard vs fewer scheduled clinic visits option (70% vs 30% after adjusting for sampling frame). Factors independently associated with preferring fewer visits were a higher disease stage, melanoma on a limb, living with others, not having private health insurance, and seeing a specialist for another chronic condition. The median delay between first detection and treatment of recurrent or new primary melanoma was 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. Only 8% missed a scheduled visit, while 40% did not perform SSE or did so at greater than 3-month intervals. Conclusions and Relevance: Some patients with melanoma may prefer fewer scheduled visits, if they are supported to do SSE and there is rapid clinical review of anything causing concern (patient-led surveillance).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490373      PMCID: PMC5876843          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  23 in total

1.  Specialized surveillance for individuals at high risk for melanoma: a cost analysis of a high-risk clinic.

Authors:  Caroline G Watts; Anne E Cust; Scott W Menzies; Elliot Coates; Graham J Mann; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Urgent access to a specialty care melanoma clinic is associated with a higher rate of melanoma detection.

Authors:  Adam D Lipworth; Jong Min Park; Brie L Trefrey; Krista M Rubin; Alan C Geller; Arthur J Sober; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Detection of first relapse in cutaneous melanoma patients: implications for the formulation of evidence-based follow-up guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Brecht Francken; Helen M Shaw; Neil A Accortt; Seng-Jaw Soong; Harald J Hoekstra; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Fear of new or recurrent melanoma after treatment for localised melanoma.

Authors:  Katy J L Bell; Yachna Mehta; Robin M Turner; Rachael L Morton; Mbathio Dieng; Robyn Saw; Pascale Guitera; Kirsten McCaffery; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Marisa Jenkins; Les Irwig; Angela C Webster
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Early-life sun exposure and risk of melanoma before age 40 years.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Mark A Jenkins; Chris Goumas; Bruce K Armstrong; Helen Schmid; Joanne F Aitken; Graham G Giles; Richard F Kefford; John L Hopper; Graham J Mann
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Melanoma patient self-detection: a review of efficacy of the skin self-examination and patient-directed educational efforts.

Authors:  Sarah Yagerman; Ashfaq Marghoob
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  Patients' perspectives of long-term follow-up for localised cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  R L Morton; L Rychetnik; K McCaffery; J F Thompson; L Irwig
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Methods of detection of first recurrence in patients with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Kimberly Moore Dalal; Qin Zhou; Katherine S Panageas; Mary S Brady; David P Jaques; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  The experience of melanoma follow-up care: an online survey of patients in australia.

Authors:  Janine Mitchell; Peta Callaghan; Jackie Street; Susan Neuhaus; Taryn Bessen
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2014-11-19

10.  The MELFO-Study: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of a Stage-adjusted Reduced Follow-up Schedule in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients-Results after 1 Year.

Authors:  Samantha Damude; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Anne Brecht Francken; Sylvia Ter Meulen; Esther Bastiaannet; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Follow-Up Schedules After Primary Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Rachael L Morton; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Assessing the Potential for Patient-led Surveillance After Treatment of Localized Melanoma (MEL-SELF): A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Deonna M Ackermann; Mbathio Dieng; Ellie Medcalf; Marisa C Jenkins; Cathelijne H van Kemenade; Monika Janda; Robin M Turner; Anne E Cust; Rachael L Morton; Les Irwig; Pascale Guitera; H Peter Soyer; Victoria Mar; Jolyn K Hersch; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Robyn P M Saw; Richard A Scolyer; Dorothy Drabarek; David Espinoza; Anthony Azzi; Alister M Lilleyman; Amelia K Smit; Peter Murchie; John F Thompson; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Definitions, survey methods, and findings of patient satisfaction studies in teledermatology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward Hadeler; Howard Gitlow; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Use of shared care and routine tests in follow-up after treatment for localised cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Lim; Robin M Turner; Rachael L Morton; Marisa C Jenkins; Les Irwig; Angela C Webster; Mbathio Dieng; Robyn P M Saw; Pascale Guitera; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Can patient-led surveillance detect subsequent new primary or recurrent melanomas and reduce the need for routinely scheduled follow-up? A protocol for the MEL-SELF randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Deonna M Ackermann; Amelia K Smit; Monika Janda; Cathelijne H van Kemenade; Mbathio Dieng; Rachael L Morton; Robin M Turner; Anne E Cust; Les Irwig; Jolyn K Hersch; Pascale Guitera; H Peter Soyer; Victoria Mar; Robyn P M Saw; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Dorothy Drabarek; David Espinoza; Jon Emery; Peter Murchie; John F Thompson; Richard A Scolyer; Anthony Azzi; Alister Lilleyman; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Health professional and patient views of a novel prognostic test for melanoma: A theoretically informed qualitative study.

Authors:  Jan Lecouturier; Helen Bosomworth; Marie Labus; Rob A Ellis; Penny E Lovat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Remote skin self-examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in-person training.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Racheal Reavy; Kimberly A Mallett; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.