Literature DB >> 18512102

Methods of detection of first recurrence in patients with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Kimberly Moore Dalal1, Qin Zhou, Katherine S Panageas, Mary S Brady, David P Jaques, Daniel G Coit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An understanding of the methods of detection of recurrent melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is essential for the coordination of a rational plan of follow-up.
METHODS: Clinical stage I/II melanoma patients who underwent SLNB from 1991 to 2004 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-institution database. Detection of recurrence by self (awareness of symptoms or abnormal physical findings) or physician (discovered on routine physical or scheduled test) and timing of clinic visit were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included physical exam every 3-4 months for the first year, every 3-6 months for the second year, and every 6-12 months thereafter. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and chest X-ray (CXR) were obtained annually. Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) were performed selectively.
RESULTS: Of 1062 patients who underwent SLNB, 203 (19%) experienced 230 initial sites of recurrence; 198 patients were evaluable for follow-up. Median follow-up after first recurrence was 17 months. Symptoms and self-detected physical findings were present in 109 patients (55%); 85 patients (78%) were seen earlier than their scheduled visit. Self-detected physical findings identified in-transit (n = 26; 24%) and nodal (n = 25; 23%) disease. Physician detection occurred in 89 patients (45%), nearly half by a scheduled radiographic test (CXR, 16%; CT, 29%; PET, 1%). The method of detection significantly predicted post-recurrence survival (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: More than half of melanoma recurrences are self-detected; these patients have the most favorable post-recurrence survival rates because of the type of recurrence detected. The mode of detection is a significant predictor of post-recurrence survival. This supports an aggressive program of patient education in self-examination after SLNB for melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18512102     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9985-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  19 in total

1.  Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines.

Authors:  Emanuela Romano; Michael Scordo; Stephen W Dusza; Daniel G Coit; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Patient Preferences for Follow-up After Recent Excision of a Localized Melanoma.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Lim; Rachael L Morton; Robin M Turner; Marisa C Jenkins; Pascale Guitera; Les Irwig; Angela C Webster; Mbathio Dieng; Robyn P M Saw; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Skin Examination Practices Among Melanoma Survivors and Their Children.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Katherine L Chen; L Cindy Chang; Tiffany Lin; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Patterns and Timing of Initial Relapse in Pathologic Stage II Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ann Y Lee; Nicolas Droppelmann; Katherine S Panageas; Qin Zhou; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mary S Brady; Paul B Chapman; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Randomized controlled trial of the mySmartSkin web-based intervention to promote skin self-examination and sun protection behaviors among individuals diagnosed with melanoma: study design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne; Pamela Ohman Strickland; Michelle Hilgart; James S Goydos; Carolyn J Heckman; Paola Chamorro; Babar K Rao; Moira Davis; Franz O Smith; Frances P Thorndike; Lee M Ritterband
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Outcome of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who do not undergo completion lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Katherine S Panageas; Charlotte E Ariyan; Klaus J Busam; Mary Sue Brady; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Prevalence and correlates of skin self-examination behaviors among melanoma survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Trishnee Bhurosy; Carolyn J Heckman; Mary Riley
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Barriers and facilitators of adherence to medical advice on skin self-examination during melanoma follow-up care.

Authors:  Annett Körner; Martin Drapeau; Brett D Thombs; Zeev Rosberger; Beatrice Wang; Manish Khanna; Alan Spatz; Adina Coroiu; Rosalind Garland; Gerald Batist
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2013-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.