Vivien Kauschke1, Annett Gebert2, Mariana Calin2, Jürgen Eckert3,4, Sebastian Scheich1, Christian Heiss1,5, Katrin Susanne Lips1. 1. Experimental Trauma Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. 2. Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 3. Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Leoben, Austria. 4. Department Materials Physics, Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria. 5. Department of Trauma Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen-Marburg, Campus: Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of osteoporotic fractures is still challenging and an urgent need exists for new materials, better adapted to osteoporotic bone by adjusted Young's modulus, appropriate surface modification and pharmaceuticals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium-40-niobium alloys, mechanically ground or additionally etched and titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium were analyzed in combination with brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acetylcholine and nicotine to determine their effects on human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro over 21 days using lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase assays, live cell imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Cell number of human mesenchymal stem cells of osteoporotic donors was increased after 14 d in presence of ground titanium-40-niobium or titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium, together with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell number of human mesenchymal stem cells of non osteoporotic donors increased after 21 d in presence of titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium without pharmaceuticals. No significant increase was measured for ground or etched titanium-40-niobium after 21 d. Osteoblast differentiation of osteoporotic donors was significantly higher than in non osteoporotic donors after 21 d in presence of etched, ground titanium-40-niobium or titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium accompanied by all pharmaceuticals tested. In presence of all alloys tested brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acetylcholine and nicotine increased differentiation of cells of osteoporotic donors and accelerated it in non osteoporotic donors. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ground titanium-40-niobium and brain-derived neurotrophic factor might be most suitable for subsequent in vivo testing.
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of osteoporotic fractures is still challenging and an urgent need exists for new materials, better adapted to osteoporotic bone by adjusted Young's modulus, appropriate surface modification and pharmaceuticals. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Titanium-40-niobium alloys, mechanically ground or additionally etched and titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium were analyzed in combination with brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acetylcholine and nicotine to determine their effects on human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro over 21 days using lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase assays, live cell imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Cell number of human mesenchymal stem cells of osteoporotic donors was increased after 14 d in presence of ground titanium-40-niobium or titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium, together with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell number of human mesenchymal stem cells of non osteoporotic donors increased after 21 d in presence of titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium without pharmaceuticals. No significant increase was measured for ground or etched titanium-40-niobium after 21 d. Osteoblast differentiation of osteoporotic donors was significantly higher than in non osteoporotic donors after 21 d in presence of etched, ground titanium-40-niobium or titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium accompanied by all pharmaceuticals tested. In presence of all alloys tested brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acetylcholine and nicotine increased differentiation of cells of osteoporotic donors and accelerated it in non osteoporotic donors. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ground titanium-40-niobium and brain-derived neurotrophic factor might be most suitable for subsequent in vivo testing.
Osteoporosis is characterized by low mineral density and altered microarchitecture
that causes fragile bone and often results in fractures [1]. Surgical treatment of osteoporoticfractures is still challenging for clinicians since implant fixation in osteoporotic
bone often fails [2, 3]. Therefore, new materials
are needed, which are adapted to the characteristics of osteoporotic bone and
ideally stimulate fracture healing. In particular, implant materials for orthopedic
applications should be robust and biocompatible [4]. With regard to non degradable implants,
titanium-based materials are predominantly used [4, 5]. Titanium and titanium alloys are preferred
as implant materials because of their biocompatibility and high corrosion resistance
[4, 6, 7]. In particular, beta titanium alloys are
favored for the treatment of fractures due to their low elastic modulus, which comes
close to that of bone [4,
8, 9] and is much lower than for currently applied
titanium or titanium alloys like titanium-6-aluminium-4-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) [10]. Especially, a low Young’s
modulus is preferable since high Young’s moduli, as measured for the momentarily
applied alloy titaniumTi-6Al-4V in orthopedic surgery [11] were shown to result in atrophy of bone and
deficient remodeling [6,
10]. This can lead to
implant failure [11]. The
beta-alloytitanium-40-niobium (Ti-40Nb), in contrast, possesses an elastic modulus
of 60–62 GPa, which can be further reduced by microalloying and thermomechanical
treatment [5] reaching an
elastic modulus closer to the one of bone.Surface modifications of implant materials play an important role as well. They can
prevent corrosion and offer higher biocompatibility by inhibiting an inflammatory
immune response [4, 12]. Moreover, surface
modification has effects on cell growth and morphology [5].Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are ideal for testing since they proliferate
quickly and they are able to differentiate into bone forming osteoblasts [13-15]. These characteristics make hMSCs a
potential therapeutic in bone regeneration [16, 17]. However, in osteoporosis osteogenic
differentiation of hMSCs is impaired in favor of adipogenic differentiation [18]. Therefore, substances are
required that stimulate hMSCs differentiation into osteoblasts. As such, bone
morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2) is already applied in the clinic. However, its effects
on osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs from osteoporoticpatients in
vivo are rather low [19]. Thus, there is a need for new factors that stimulate osteogenic
differentiation in osteoporosis.Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was shown to stimulate secretion of vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from osteoblasts during fracture healing [20]. This is important since
fractures do not heal properly without angiogenesis [21, 22]. Moreover, BDNF plays a potential role
during bone remodeling and bone formation. It is involved in differentiation
processes and was detected in osteoblast-like cells or osteoblasts in different
healing models [23-27].Several studies demonstrated that acetylcholine (ACh) is involved in the regulation
of proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts [28-30]. Sato et al. (2010) showed that ACh
supports cell cycle progression in osteoblasts, but inhibits alkaline phosphatase
(ALP) activity during osteoblast differentiation [29].Effects of nicotine (Nic) on bone metabolism are discussed controversially. It was
shown that nicotine concentrations, as found in heavy smokers, inhibited osteoblast
differentiation, worsened fracture healing [31] and increased osteoclast differentiation
in vitro [32]. Kim et al. (2012) demonstrated bimodal effects of Nic at low
concentrations by means of increased osteoblast proliferation and decreased
differentiation [33].
However, Rothem et al. (2009) indicated dose-dependent effects of Nic. Nic
concentrations as present in light or moderate smokers increased osteoblast
proliferation but at higher concentrations, as seen in case of heavy smokers, it
caused adverse effects [34],
which was confirmed by Shen et al. (2013) [31].These findings indicate that BDNF, ACh and Nic might be potential pharmaceuticals for
the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, which was the underlying reason to analyze
these factors in the present study in vitro.We therefore analyzed whether new Ti-40Nb alloys together with BDNF, ACh or Nic are
potential drugs to increase cell number and to stimulate osteogenic differentiation
of hMSCs, especially in osteoporoticpatients.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Human mesenchymal stem cells
Harvesting of hMSCs was approved by a written statement of the local ethics
commission of the department of medicine at the Justus-Liebig-University of
Giessen (74/09). Patients gave written consent for their participation in the
underlying study.hMSCs were isolated from reaming debris as described by Wenisch et al. (2005)
[35] and were
obtained from different female osteoporotic as well as male and female
non-osteoporotic donors (n = 4 each) who underwent surgery in the department of
trauma surgery at the University of Giessen. Age of patients ranged from 25 to
80 years.In brief, reaming debris was incubated in Petri dishes (Becton-Dickson Falcon
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) with F-12K medium (Gibco, Life Technologies,
Carlsbad, USA) containing 20% fetal calf serum (PanSera ES, Pan Biotech,
Aidenbach, Germany), 1% of 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/g streptomycin (Gibco)
at 37°C under 6% CO2 atmosphere. After approximately 1 week cells
migrated out of the debris. When cell growth reached confluence cells were
detached by applying 0.05% Trypsin (Gibco). Subsequently, hMSCs were transferred
into cryo tubes (Greiner bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany) containing 0.9 ml
fetal calf serum (FCS) as well as 0.1 ml DMSO and stored over night at -80°C
before being placed in liquid nitrogen.Identification of hMSCs was achieved using a Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting
(FACS) machine, FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA)
after labeling cells with mouse-anti-human CD105-APC and mouse-anti-humanCD73-PB antibodies (BioLegend, San Diego, California, USA).Before starting the experimental procedure, hMSCs were placed in 200 ml cell
culture flasks (Greiner bio-one) containing MesenPro RS Medium (Gibco) including
10% FCS (PanSera ES), 1% Glutamax (Gibco) and 1% of 100 U/ml penicillin and 100
μg/g streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C under 6% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were
split once when confluence was reached.Experiments were performed in 24-well-plates (Becton-Dickson Falcon). Therefore,
4x104 hMSCs were seeded into each well. Cells were cultivated in
F-12K medium (Gibco) containing 20% FCS for cell number analysis.For differentiation assays osteogenic medium composed of low glucose Dulbeccos
modified Eagles medium (Gibco), including 10% FCS (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany),
1% 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/g streptomycin (Gibco), 10−7 M
dexamethasone (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), 5x10-5 M (+)
sodium-L-ascorbat (Sigma), 10−2 M ß-glycero phosphate hydrate
(Sigma), 5x10-8 M vitamin D3 (Sigma-Aldrich) and
1.5x10-3 M calcium chloride (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) was
used.hMSCs were either incubated with etched Ti-40Nb, ground Ti-40Nb or Ti-6Al-4V.
Pharmaceuticals were added at the following concentrations: 40 ng/ml BDNF
(Sigma), 10−4 M ACh (Sigma) or 10−6 M Nic (Sigma).
Decisions for selection of concentrations used were made after testing different
concentrations of these pharmaceuticals on hMSCs in vitro (data
shown in supporting information S1 Fig). The pharmaceutical concentration
coming the closest to or above the ALP concentration of cells that were
incubated without pharmaceuticals (control) was chosen. Testing for the
appropriate ACh concentration revealed that 10−3 M caused the highest
ALP concentration. However, live cell images depicted holes within the cell
layer so that 10−4 M was applied for experiments.In order to determine effects of the different Ti alloys and pharmaceuticals used
hMSCs that were incubated with or without Ti alloys in the absence of
pharmaceuticals served as controls.
2.2 Titanium-40-niobium
Ti-40Nb samples were produced as described by Helth et al. (2014) [36]. In brief, high purity
Ti and Nb were arc-melted to alloy ingots under argon atmosphere and
subsequently cast into rod-shape with 10 mm diameter using cold crucible
casting. The rods were homogenized by annealing for 24 h at 1000°C in an argon
filled quartz tube. Subsequently, rods were cut in 2–3 mm thick disks and then,
either mechanically ground or additionally chemically etched. Grinding was
performed with P1200 silicon carbide emery paper. For additional etching of the
Ti-40Nb surface, samples were treated with so-called piranha solution composed
of 98% H2SO4 + 30% H2O2 (1+1
dilution) [5].
2.3 Live cell imaging
Cells were regularly monitored using an inverse light microscope (Zeiss,
Oberkochen Germany) and pictures taken at time points 0 days (d), 1 d, 7 d, 14 d
and 21 d with the microscope accompanying Stingray F-145 camera (Allied vision
technologies GmbH, Stadtroda, Germany).
2.4 Immunofluorescence imaging of non osteogenic and osteogenic
differentiated hMSCs
For immunofluorescence imaging cell medium was removed and cells carefully washed
with cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, cells were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min before washed again 3x with cold PBS. For
permeabilization of cells 0.1% triton-X 100 (Sigma) was added for 5 min. After
washing 3x with cold PBS cells were incubated for 40 min with 1%
tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate (TRITC) coupled phalloidin antibody
(Sigma) in the dark. For the detection of nuclei cells were incubated for 15 min
with 1% Hoechst 33258 antibody (Sigma) after washing cells 6x with cold PBS.
Finally, cells were covered in ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Life technologies)
before microscopic evaluation.
2.5 Determination of hMSCs numbers
For the determination of total hMSCs numbers a CytoTox 96®
Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega, Madison, USA) was performed.
Besides measuring cytotoxic effects, this assay can be applied for total cell
number analysis. According to manufacturer’s instructions cell numbers can be
analyzed if cells are lyzed using a solution to release lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH), which is present inside the cytoplasm of intact cells.Before applying the CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay,
hMSCs were washed twice with PBS to remove medium and potential dead cells. PBS
was then completely removed and cells immediately stored at -80°C to cause cell
burst followed by LDH release. Subsequently, cell membrane of hMSCs was
additionally disrupted by applying 1 ml of 1% triton-X 100 (Sigma) to each well
of the 24-well-plate for 50 min under shaking conditions. Lysates were then
removed from the wells and transferred into Eppendorf tubes for centrifugation
at 1800 rpm for 5 min. After centrifugation, 50 μl of the supernatant were
filled into wells of a 96-well-plate (Greiner bio-one) in triplicates followed
by 50 μl of reconstituted substrate (Promega). The 96-well-plate was then shaken
for 1 min and incubated in the dark for 30 min. Finally, stop solution was added
and absorption measured at 490 nm using the Synergy HT plate reader (BioTek
Instruments Inc., Winooski, USA). For hMSCs of each donor a calibration curve
was conducted by seeding 5x103, 1x104, 2x104,
4x104, 6x104, 8x104, 1x105
1,2x105, 1,4x105 and 1,6x105 cells per
well. Cell numbers are directly proportional to absorbance values measured and
traced back to amounts of the calibration curve.
2.6 Determination of osteoblast numbers
A PicroGreen assay (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA) was performed to determine
cell numbers based on DNA content. Before conducting the assay, cells were
washed twice with PBS, which was then completely removed and cells immediately
stored at -80°C. Lysis was achieved by incubating cells in 250 μl of triton-X
100 (Sigma) for 10 min on a rocking platform. Lysates were then centrifuged for
10 min at 3000 g and 4°C. Two hundred μl of PicoGreen working solution were
pipetted into a black 96-well-plate before 5 μl of the supernatants were added
in triplicates. Fluorescence intensity was measured at 528 nm after sample
excitation at 485 nm using the Synergy HT plate reader (BioTek).
2.7 Cell differentiation analysis
For the analysis of hMSCs differentiation into osteoblasts, the activity of
alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was measured using the SensoLyte pNPP Alkaline
Phosphatase Assay Kit (AnaSpec, Fremont, USA). After cell lyses and
centrifugation as described above (2.6), 10 μl of the supernatants were added in
triplicates into 96-well-plates. Before, wells were equipped with 40 μl of
dilution buffer. Subsequently, 50 μl of para-nitrophenylphosphate substrate were
added. After incubation for 45 min at 37°C, enzyme activity was measured at 405
nm using the Synergy HT plate reader (BioTek). ALP activity was referenced to
cell numbers obtained from the PicoGreen assay mentioned in section 2.6.
2.8 Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using the statistics program SPSS (version
22.0; SPSS Institute Inc, Chicago, USA), which was also conducted to generate
graphs in figures 8 and 9 (supporting information S2 and S3). Results were
evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test to assess normality. Results were not
normally distributed, so that Kruskal-Wallis-, Mann-Whitney-U-tests or
Friedman-tests were conducted. For the comparison of osteoporotic and non
osteoporotic donors Kruskal-Wallis- and Mann-Whitney-U-tests were conducted. The
Friedman-test was applied for the comparison of different Ti alloys and the
comparison of pharmaceuticals. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be
significant.
3. Results
3.1 Live cell imaging
Live cell imaging of hMSCs showed that cells of osteoporotic and non osteoporotic
donors orientated towards all tested Ti alloys and did not avoid contact to the
material (Figs 1A–1D–6A–6D). Predominantly
spindle-shaped morphology of hMSCs was seen during the entire evaluation period.
Less often large, flat hMSCs were observed. Moreover, rapidly self-renewing
cells (RS cells) were predominantly present in cultures of hMSCs of non
osteoporotic donors. After 21 d of culture cell number (Fig 3) and mineralization (Fig 6) were visually increased
in comparison to cell number and mineralization at time point 7 d (Figs 1 and 4). Images of cell number at time point 14 d
are shown in Fig 2. Less
mineral was present after 7 d (Fig
4) of osteogenic differentiation compared to time points 14 d (Fig 5) and 21 d (Fig 6). At time point 14 days
more mineralization was observed in cell cultures of non osteoporotic donors
compared to cells of osteoporotic donors (Fig 5). In contrast, after 21 d more mineral
was seen in cell cultures of osteoporotic donors compared to non osteoporotic
donors (Fig 6).
Fig 1
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 7 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Fig 6
Live cell images of hMSCs after 21 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
mineral. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
Fig 3
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 21 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
RS cells. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
Fig 4
Live cell images of hMSCs after 7 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Fig 2
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 14 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Fig 5
Live cell images of hMSCs after 14 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
mineral. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 7 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 14 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs number after 21 days in
vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
RS cells. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs after 7 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). The images show cells
of different donors as typical representative of 4 independent
experiments. Black regions at the margin of pictures show Ti alloys.
Scale bar shown in A applies to all photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs after 14 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
mineral. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
Live cell images of hMSCs after 21 days of differentiation in
osteogenic medium in vitro.
Shown are hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right)
donors in presence of etched (1st row) or ground Ti-40Nb
(2nd row), Ti-6Al-4V (3rd row) or without Ti
(4th row) in presence of BDNF (A), ACh (B), Nic (C) or
without pharmaceuticals serving as controls (D). White arrows indicate
mineral. The images show cells of different donors as typical
representative of 4 independent experiments. Black regions at the margin
of pictures show Ti alloys. Scale bar shown in A applies to all
photographs in this figure.
3.2 Immunofluorescence imaging
Immunofluorescence labeling of hMSCs showed that cells attached to all Ti alloys
tested after 1 d of incubation in non osteogenic medium (I) as seen in Fig 7A–7F and after 7 d of
incubation in osteogenic medium (II) shown in Fig 7G–7L. Whereas in non osteogenic medium
cells attached to the material in a rather large, elongated and flat shape
(Fig 7A–7F), they
occasonally formed a round cytoskeleton in osteogenic medium. This was seen for
cells of osteoporotic donors incubated with ground Ti-40Nb (Fig 7I) and cells of both donor pools
incubated with Ti-6Al-4V (Fig 7K
and 7L).
Fig 7
Immunofluorescence labeling of hMSCs incubated in non osteogenic and
osteogenic medium.
(I) hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right) donors
after 1 d of incubation with etched (A and B), ground Ti-40Nb (C and D)
or Ti-6Al-4V (E and F) in presence of non osteogenic medium without
pharmaceuticals. (II) hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic
(right) donors after 7 d of incubation with etched Ti-40Nb (G and H),
ground Ti-40Nb (I and J) and Ti-6Al-4V (K and L) in presence of
osteogenic medium without pharmaceuticals.
Immunofluorescence labeling of hMSCs incubated in non osteogenic and
osteogenic medium.
(I) hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic (right) donors
after 1 d of incubation with etched (A and B), ground Ti-40Nb (C and D)
or Ti-6Al-4V (E and F) in presence of non osteogenic medium without
pharmaceuticals. (II) hMSCs of osteoporotic (left) and non osteoporotic
(right) donors after 7 d of incubation with etched Ti-40Nb (G and H),
ground Ti-40Nb (I and J) and Ti-6Al-4V (K and L) in presence of
osteogenic medium without pharmaceuticals.
3.3 Determination of hMSCs numbers
An increase in relative cell number was detected generally for hMSCs of
osteoporotic and non osteoporotic donors in presence of etched and ground
Ti-40Nb as well as Ti-6Al-4V, with or without pharmaceuticals within 7–21 d
(Fig 8 and supporting
information S2
Fig).
Fig 8
Relative cell number of hMSCs of osteoporotic (grey boxplots) and non
osteoporotic (white boxplots) donors in presence of etched or ground
Ti-40Nb, Ti-6Al-4V as well as without Ti with or without
pharmaceuticals.
Shown is the effect of Ti alloys on cell number after 14 d (A) and 21 d
(B) of in vitro incubation. The grey line represents
cells at time point 0 d without Ti and without pharmaceuticals. A value
of p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant and is indicated with one
asterisk.
Relative cell number of hMSCs of osteoporotic (grey boxplots) and non
osteoporotic (white boxplots) donors in presence of etched or ground
Ti-40Nb, Ti-6Al-4V as well as without Ti with or without
pharmaceuticals.
Shown is the effect of Ti alloys on cell number after 14 d (A) and 21 d
(B) of in vitro incubation. The grey line represents
cells at time point 0 d without Ti and without pharmaceuticals. A value
of p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant and is indicated with one
asterisk.A significant increase of relative cell number was measured for hMSCs of
osteoporotic donors after 14 d of incubation with BDNF in presence of ground
Ti-40Nb or Ti-6Al-4V compared to hMSCs that were incubated with BDNF but without
Ti (Fig 8A).After 21 d of cell culture Ti-6Al-4V without pharmaceuticals was significantly
more stimulating than etched Ti-40Nb without pharmaceuticals on the
proliferation of hMSCs of non osteoporotic donors. Moreover, number of hMSCs of
non osteoporotic donors was increased in presence of Ti-6Al-4V compared to hMSCs
of the same donor pool that were incubated without Ti and without
pharmaceuticals (Fig
8B).
3.4 Analysis of cell differentiation based on ALP activity
After 7 days of incubation etched Ti-40Nb in absence of pharmaceuticals was the
most stimulating titanium alloy on ALP activity of cells of osteoporotic and non
osteoporotic donors. A significant increase occurred in comparison to cells that
were incubated without Ti (Fig
9A). Moreover, a significant increase in relative ALP activity was
detected in cells of non osteoporotic donors in presence of etched Ti-40Nb and
Nic after 7 days of incubation when compared to cells that were incubated with
Nic but without titanium (Fig
9A). Supporting information is shown in S3A
Fig.
Fig 9
Relative ALP activity in hMSCs of osteoporotic (grey boxplots) and
non osteoporotic donors (white boxplots) in presence of etched or ground
Ti-40Nb, Ti-6Al-4V as well as without Ti with or without
pharmaceuticals.
Shown are the effect of Ti alloys on ALP activity after 7 d (A) and 21 d
(B) as well as the effect of pharmaceuticals after 21 d of in
vitro incubation (C). The grey line represents cells at
time point 0 d without Ti and without pharmaceuticals. A value of p ≤
0.05 was considered to be significant and is indicated with one
asterisk.
Relative ALP activity in hMSCs of osteoporotic (grey boxplots) and
non osteoporotic donors (white boxplots) in presence of etched or ground
Ti-40Nb, Ti-6Al-4V as well as without Ti with or without
pharmaceuticals.
Shown are the effect of Ti alloys on ALP activity after 7 d (A) and 21 d
(B) as well as the effect of pharmaceuticals after 21 d of in
vitro incubation (C). The grey line represents cells at
time point 0 d without Ti and without pharmaceuticals. A value of p ≤
0.05 was considered to be significant and is indicated with one
asterisk.After 14 days of incubation no differences were detected between the different
pharmaceuticals or titanium alloys in regard to relative ALP activity in cells
of both donor pools (data shown in supporting information S3A and S3C
Fig).However, after 21 days in presence of etched Ti-40Nb, Nic was the most effective
pharmaceutical on relative ALP activity of cells of osteoporotic donors compared
to cells of non osteoporotic donors that were treated the same way (Fig 9B). In presence of ground
Ti-40Nb, BDNF and Nic were the most effective pharmaceuticals on cell
differentiation of osteoporotic donors, resulting in significantly higher ALP
activity compared to cells of non osteoporotic donors. The effect of BDNF was
even stronger than that of Nic when comparing the ALP activity of non
osteoporotic donors (Fig
9B).Nevertheless, Nic caused a significant increase in relative ALP activity in cells
of osteoporotic donors compared to those of non osteoporotic donors, regardless
of the titanium alloy added. This effect was shown for ACh only in presence of
Ti-6Al-4V (Fig 9B).Comparing the relative ALP activity of cells of both donor pools in absence of
pharmaceuticals, none of the titanium alloys tested was significantly more
effective than the other (Fig
9C).
4. Discussion
Cell imaging revealed that hMSCs of both donor pools attached to all Ti alloys
tested. This aspect indicates that etching or grinding of the Ti-40Nb surface does
not negatively affect cell adherence and is similar to the adherence of cells to
Ti-6Al-4V.However, immunofluorescence labeling showed that cell morphology was partially
different between cells that were incubated in non osteogenic or osteogenic medium.
After 7 d in presence of osteogenic medium and ground Ti-40Nb as well as Ti-6Al-4V,
cells developed a roundish looking (nest-like) cytoskeleton. The nest-like
cytoskeleton is considered to be characteristic of not fully differentiated
osteoblasts [37]. According
to Owen et al. (1990) ALP activity, as a marker for osteoblastic differentiation,
should be the highest at this stage [38]. In our study cells with nest-like structure were detected after 7 d
on ground Ti-40Nb and Ti-6Al-4V. However, 7 d results of the ALP assay showed that
activity was the highest in presence of etched Ti-40Nb. This observation matches
Rodriguez et al. (2004) who ascertained that hMSCs can reveal the characteristic
cytoskeleton of differentiated cells but exhibit low ALP activity [39].Generally, the number of hMSCs was rarely altered. After 14 d BDNF was the only
pharmaceutical that caused a significant effect on the number of hMSCs of
osteoporotic donors in presence of ground Ti-40Nb or Ti-6Al-4V when compared to
cells that were incubated with BDNF but without Ti. Cells of non osteoporotic donors
remained unaffected. However, after 7 d BDNF did not increase the number of hMSCs.
This corresponds with the result of Ida-Yonemochi et al. (2017) who did not detect
an increase in proliferation in MC3T3-E1 cells after 7 d [40]. In contrast, Cai et al. (2010) showed that
osteoblast proliferation increased after 6 d in a co-culture system of
BDNF-producing Schwann cells and osteoblasts [41]. We therefore hypothesize that BDNF shows
time-dependent effects on the number of hMSCs in presence of ground Ti-40Nb or
reference Ti.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ida-Yonemochi%20H%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=28072837
ACh and Nic did not significantly increase the number of hMSCs at any time
point.After 21 d of in vitro cultivation, hMSCs numbers of non
osteoporotic donors were significantly increased in presence of Ti-6Al-4V and
without pharmaceuticals when compared to hMSCs that were incubated with etched
Ti-40Nb or without Ti.Pharmaceuticals alone did not alter numbers of hMSCs. This might be reasoned by the
concentration of pharmaceuticals used. We used an ACh concentration of
10−4 M, which neither significantly increased nor decreased hMSCs
numbers. Another study analyzing proliferation of bone marrow-derived MSCs from
rats, applied ACh concentrations ranging from 10−5–10−9 M.
These concentrations did not affect proliferation either [42].A dose-dependent effect was detected for Nic by Kim et al. (2012) who showed a
significant increase of cell proliferation after 7 d of incubation using Nic
concentrations of 1 or 2 mM [33]. A Nic concentration of 1 μM, as applied in our study, did not
affect the proliferation of cells [33], which is in accordance with our results.On the other hand, a concentration of 1 μM Nic significantly increased the
differentiation of cells of non osteoporotic donors after 7 d in presence of etched
Ti-40Nb, but also without Nic differentiation of hMSCs of both donor pools increased
significantly after 7 d in presence of etched Ti-40Nb.After 14 d of differentiation ALP activity was the same in both donor pools,
irrespective of the titanium alloy or pharmaceutical tested.In contrast to Sato et al. (2010) who showed that ACh decreased ALP activity in
murine osteoblasts in vitro [29], we detected an increase in ALP activity of
hMSCs of osteoporotic donors in presence of ACh and Ti-6Al-4V after 21 d.Usually, ALP activity of osteoblasts decreases with progressing mineralization [38]. However, after 21 d ALP
activity in hMSCs of osteoporotic donors was significantly higher when compared to
hMSCs of non osteoporotic donors. In fact, ALP activity in hMSCs of non osteoporotic
donors decreased significantly after 21 d of differentiation in presence of all
titanium alloys and pharmaceuticals tested. This indicates that the peak of ALP
activity was reached earlier in cells of non osteoporotic donors and mineralization
had already started, which led to the decrease in ALP activity after 21 d. This is
in accordance with live cell images, which showed a rather large amount of mineral
after 14 d in cell cultures of non osteoporotic donors compared to those of
osteoporotic donors. Furthermore, we detected RS cells in cultures of non
osteoporotic donors. RS cells are a hMSC subtype which were shown to differentiate
more extensively than larger mature hMSCs [43]. This is a further indicator that
differentiation was already progressed in hMSCs of non osteoporotic donors.
Moreover, our results suggest that low concentrations of BDNF, ACh or Nic stimulate
ALP activity in hMSCs of osteoporotic donors after 21 d in presence of all titanium
alloys. Supporting this statement is the aspect that ALP activity did not differ
significantly between both donor pools after 21 d when incubated without
pharmaceuticals in presence of each titanium alloy. Stimulation of osteoblast
differentiation is aimed in osteoporoticpatients since it is known that in
osteoporosis the potential to differentiate into osteoblasts is declined and
differentiation into adipocytes is increased [44].Guo et al. (2016) found that BDNF knockdown can suppress marker expression of
osteoblastic differentiation, indicating that BDNF might stimulate osteoblast
differentiation [45]. We
observed that BDNF significantly increased cell differentiation of non osteoporotic
donors in presence of ground Ti-40Nb compared to the same cells that were incubated
with ground Ti-40Nb but in presence of Nic. This result shows that BDNF is more
stimulating than Nic on cell differentiation of non osteoporotic donors in presence
of ground Ti-40Nb after 21 d.However, together with etched Ti-40Nb or Ti-6Al-4V, Nic increased cell
differentiation of osteoporotic donors as well.Even though hMSCs numbers and differentiation were also increased after 21 d in
presence of Ti-6Al-4V, the contained elements vanadium and aluminum are known to be
toxic [4, 6, 46]. Particularly, vanadium can cause allergic
reactions, which led to eczematous dermatitis and implant failure in one patient
[47]. Moreover, Ti-6Al-4V
possesses a relatively high elastic modulus (approx. 110 GPa) compared to that of
human bone [11], which makes
it rather inapplicable for orthopedic surgery, especially of osteoporotic bone.
Ti-40Nb possesses a low elastic modulus of approximately 60–62 GPa [5], which comes closer to that
of bone (cortical bone: 16–20 GPa, cancellous bone: 1–4 GPa) [4, 8, 9] when compared to Ti-6Al-4V. This indicates
that etched or ground Ti-40Nb might be more suitable as implant materials than
Ti-6Al-4V. Besides, Nb is a non toxic element [11].Implant surfaces can determine cell behavior. The interaction between cells and
material can regulate processes such as proliferation or differentiation of cells
[11]. It was shown that
rough titanium implant surfaces increased differentiation of hMSCs towards the
osteoblastic lineage [48],
which is aimed in regard to osseointegration of implants. Besides, chemical
properties of implant material can influence cell behavior [11]. In our study, differentiation of hMSCs of
non osteoporotic donors into osteoblasts was achieved after 7 d either in presence
of etched Ti-40Nb together with Nic or in both donor pools without any
pharmaceutical also in presence of etched Ti-40Nb. After 21 d all titanium alloys
tested increased differentiation of hMSCs of osteoporotic donors in presence of each
pharmaceutical.To summarize, hMSCs numbers of osteoporotic donors increased after 14 d in presence
of ground Ti-40Nb or Ti-6Al-4V, both accompanied by BDNF. hMSCs numbers of non
osteoporotic donors increased significantly after 21 d in presence of Ti-6Al-4V
only. However, Ti-6Al-4V is not preferred because of the toxic effects of aluminum
and vanadium.In regard to osteoblast differentiation ground Ti-40Nb together with BDNF was
effective in both donor pools.Considering that hMSCs numbers and differentiation were both significantly increased
in presence of ground Ti-40Nb and BDNF, we conclude that this alloy might be the
most suitable candidate for in vivo applications.
Determination of the appropriate concentration of BDNF (A), ACh (B) and
Nic (C) for use in experiments.
Shown are the different pharmaceutical concentrations compared to cells
treated without pharmaceuticals (control). Values above bars indicate ALP
concentrations in percentage compared to the control.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Shown are the effects of Ti alloys and pharmaceuticals on cell number after 7
d (A and B) and 14 d (C) and 21 d (D) of in vitro
incubation. The grey line represents cells at time point 0 d without Ti and
without pharmaceuticals.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Relative ALP activity in hMSCs of osteoporotic (grey boxplots) and non
osteoporotic donors (white boxplots) in presence of etched or ground
Ti-40Nb, Ti-6Al-4V as well as without Ti with or without
pharmaceuticals.
Shown are the effects of pharmaceuticals and Ti alloys on ALP activity after
7 d (A) as well as after 14 d (B and C) of in vitro
incubation. The grey line represents cells at time point 0 d without Ti and
without pharmaceuticals.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Karin Wuertz-Kozak; Martin Roszkowski; Elena Cambria; Andrea Block; Gisela A Kuhn; Thea Abele; Wolfgang Hitzl; David Drießlein; Ralph Müller; Michael A Rapp; Isabelle M Mansuy; Eva M J Peters; Pia M Wippert Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Thomas Leonhard Loy; David Vehlow; Vivien Kauschke; Martin Müller; Christian Heiss; Katrin Susanne Lips Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.411