Literature DB >> 29486323

The impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI.

Graham L Baum1, David R Roalf1, Philip A Cook2, Rastko Ciric1, Adon F G Rosen1, Cedric Xia1, Mark A Elliott2, Kosha Ruparel1, Ragini Verma2, Birkan Tunç2, Ruben C Gur1, Raquel E Gur1, Danielle S Bassett3, Theodore D Satterthwaite4.   

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that data quality is a critical confound in the construction of brain networks derived from functional MRI. This problem is particularly relevant for studies of human brain development where important variables (such as participant age) are correlated with data quality. Nevertheless, the impact of head motion on estimates of structural connectivity derived from diffusion tractography methods remains poorly characterized. Here, we evaluated the impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity using a sample of 949 participants (ages 8-23 years old) who passed a rigorous quality assessment protocol for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) acquired as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Structural brain networks were constructed for each participant using both deterministic and probabilistic tractography. We hypothesized that subtle variation in head motion would systematically bias estimates of structural connectivity and confound developmental inference, as observed in previous studies of functional connectivity. Even following quality assurance and retrospective correction for head motion, eddy currents, and field distortions, in-scanner head motion significantly impacted the strength of structural connectivity in a consistency- and length-dependent manner. Specifically, increased head motion was associated with reduced estimates of structural connectivity for network edges with high inter-subject consistency, which included both short- and long-range connections. In contrast, motion inflated estimates of structural connectivity for low-consistency network edges that were primarily shorter-range. Finally, we demonstrate that age-related differences in head motion can both inflate and obscure developmental inferences on structural connectivity. Taken together, these data delineate the systematic impact of head motion on structural connectivity, and provide a critical context for identifying motion-related confounds in studies of structural brain network development.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Confound; DTI; Development; Motion; Structural connectivity; dMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486323      PMCID: PMC5911236          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  107 in total

Review 1.  The ontogeny of the human connectome: development and dynamic changes of brain connectivity across the life span.

Authors:  Guusje Collin; Martijn P van den Heuvel
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography.

Authors:  Colin Reveley; Anil K Seth; Carlo Pierpaoli; Afonso C Silva; David Yu; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Frank Q Ye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; Kosha Ruparel; Guray Erus; Mark A Elliott; Simon B Eickhoff; Efstathios D Gennatas; Chad Jackson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Alex Smith; Hakon Hakonarson; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  "Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins": how noise distorts diffusion-weighted MR data.

Authors:  Derek K Jones; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  G K Rohde; A S Barnett; P J Basser; S Marenco; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Structural Brain Connectivity as a Genetic Marker for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Marc M Bohlken; Rachel M Brouwer; René C W Mandl; Martijn P Van den Heuvel; Anna M Hedman; Marc De Hert; Wiepke Cahn; René S Kahn; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  Growth Charting of Brain Connectivity Networks and the Identification of Attention Impairment in Youth.

Authors:  Daniel Kessler; Michael Angstadt; Chandra Sripada
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 8.  Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications.

Authors:  Daniel C Alexander; Tim B Dyrby; Markus Nilsson; Hui Zhang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Real-time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs.

Authors:  Nico U F Dosenbach; Jonathan M Koller; Eric A Earl; Oscar Miranda-Dominguez; Rachel L Klein; Andrew N Van; Abraham Z Snyder; Bonnie J Nagel; Joel T Nigg; Annie L Nguyen; Victoria Wesevich; Deanna J Greene; Damien A Fair
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Evaluation and statistical inference for human connectomes.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Jason D Yeatman; Ariel Rokem; Kendrick N Kay; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  31 in total

1.  Sex differences in network controllability as a predictor of executive function in youth.

Authors:  Eli J Cornblath; Evelyn Tang; Graham L Baum; Tyler M Moore; Azeez Adebimpe; David R Roalf; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Fabio Pasqualetti; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The Superficial White Matter in Autism and Its Role in Connectivity Anomalies and Symptom Severity.

Authors:  Seok-Jun Hong; Brian Hyung; Casey Paquola; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Psychosis risk is associated with decreased white matter integrity in limbic network corticostriatal tracts.

Authors:  Kelsey T Straub; Jessica P Y Hua; Nicole R Karcher; John G Kerns
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.376

4.  Tensor network factorizations: Relationships between brain structural connectomes and traits.

Authors:  Zhengwu Zhang; Genevera I Allen; Hongtu Zhu; David Dunson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An afferent white matter pathway from the pulvinar to the amygdala facilitates fear recognition.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Understanding the Emergence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders With Network Neuroscience.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Cedric Huchuan Xia; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Heritability and Cognitive Relevance of Structural Brain Controllability.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Amanda Rodrigue; David C Glahn; Danielle S Bassett; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Zaixu Cui; Jennifer Stiso; Graham L Baum; Jason Z Kim; David R Roalf; Richard F Betzel; Shi Gu; Zhixin Lu; Cedric H Xia; Xiaosong He; Rastko Ciric; Desmond J Oathes; Tyler M Moore; Russell T Shinohara; Kosha Ruparel; Christos Davatzikos; Fabio Pasqualetti; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Brain network dynamics during working memory are modulated by dopamine and diminished in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Heike Tost; Urs Braun; Anais Harneit; Giulio Pergola; Tommaso Menara; Axel Schäfer; Richard F Betzel; Zhenxiang Zang; Janina I Schweiger; Xiaolong Zhang; Kristina Schwarz; Junfang Chen; Giuseppe Blasi; Alessandro Bertolino; Daniel Durstewitz; Fabio Pasqualetti; Emanuel Schwarz; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The impact of susceptibility correction on diffusion metrics in adolescents.

Authors:  Katri Lahti; Riitta Parkkola; Päivi Jääsaari; Leena Haataja; Virva Saunavaara
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.