IMPORTANCE: Intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs), important units of brain functional organization, demonstrate substantial maturation during youth. In addition, interrelationships between ICNs have been reliably implicated in attention performance. It is unknown whether alterations in ICN maturational profiles can reliably detect impaired attention functioning in youth. OBJECTIVE: To use a network growth charting approach to investigate the association between alterations in ICN maturation and attention performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from the publicly available Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a prospective, population-based sample of 9498 youths who underwent genomic testing, neurocognitive assessment, and neuroimaging. Data collection was conducted at an academic and children's hospital health care network between November 1, 2009, and November 30, 2011, and data analysis was conducted between February 1, 2015, and January 15, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Statistical associations between deviations from normative network growth were assessed as well as 2 main outcome measures: accuracy during the Penn Continuous Performance Test and diagnosis with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. RESULTS: Of the 9498 individuals identified, 1000 youths aged 8 to 22 years underwent brain imaging. A sample of 519 youths who met quality control criteria entered analysis, of whom 25 (4.8%) met criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The mean (SD) age of the youth was 15.7 (3.1) years, and 223 (43.0%) were male. Participants' patterns of deviations from normative maturational trajectories were indicative of sustained attention functioning (R2 = 24%; F6,512 = 26.89; P < 2.2 × 10-16). Moreover, these patterns were found to be a reliable biomarker of severe attention impairment (peak receiver operating characteristic curve measured by area under the curve, 79.3%). In particular, a down-shifted pattern of ICN maturation (shallow maturation), rather than a right-shifted pattern (lagged maturation), was implicated in reduced attention performance (Akaike information criterion relative likelihood, 3.22 × 1026). Finally, parallel associations between ICN dysmaturation and diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Growth charting methods are widely used to assess the development of physical or other biometric characteristics, such as weight and head circumference. To date, this is the first demonstration that this method can be extended to development of functional brain networks to identify clinically relevant conditions, such as dysfunction of sustained attention.
IMPORTANCE: Intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs), important units of brain functional organization, demonstrate substantial maturation during youth. In addition, interrelationships between ICNs have been reliably implicated in attention performance. It is unknown whether alterations in ICN maturational profiles can reliably detect impaired attention functioning in youth. OBJECTIVE: To use a network growth charting approach to investigate the association between alterations in ICN maturation and attention performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from the publicly available Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a prospective, population-based sample of 9498 youths who underwent genomic testing, neurocognitive assessment, and neuroimaging. Data collection was conducted at an academic and children's hospital health care network between November 1, 2009, and November 30, 2011, and data analysis was conducted between February 1, 2015, and January 15, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Statistical associations between deviations from normative network growth were assessed as well as 2 main outcome measures: accuracy during the Penn Continuous Performance Test and diagnosis with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. RESULTS: Of the 9498 individuals identified, 1000 youths aged 8 to 22 years underwent brain imaging. A sample of 519 youths who met quality control criteria entered analysis, of whom 25 (4.8%) met criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The mean (SD) age of the youth was 15.7 (3.1) years, and 223 (43.0%) were male. Participants' patterns of deviations from normative maturational trajectories were indicative of sustained attention functioning (R2 = 24%; F6,512 = 26.89; P < 2.2 × 10-16). Moreover, these patterns were found to be a reliable biomarker of severe attention impairment (peak receiver operating characteristic curve measured by area under the curve, 79.3%). In particular, a down-shifted pattern of ICN maturation (shallow maturation), rather than a right-shifted pattern (lagged maturation), was implicated in reduced attention performance (Akaike information criterion relative likelihood, 3.22 × 1026). Finally, parallel associations between ICN dysmaturation and diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Growth charting methods are widely used to assess the development of physical or other biometric characteristics, such as weight and head circumference. To date, this is the first demonstration that this method can be extended to development of functional brain networks to identify clinically relevant conditions, such as dysfunction of sustained attention.
Authors: Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Jessica A Church; Alexander L Cohen; Shefali Brahmbhatt; Francis M Miezin; Deanna M Barch; Marcus E Raichle; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Adriana Di Martino; Damien A Fair; Clare Kelly; Theodore D Satterthwaite; F Xavier Castellanos; Moriah E Thomason; R Cameron Craddock; Beatriz Luna; Bennett L Leventhal; Xi-Nian Zuo; Michael P Milham Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Chandra Sekhar Sripada; Daniel Kessler; Robert Welsh; Michael Angstadt; Israel Liberzon; K Luan Phan; Clayton Scott Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ruben C Gur; Monica E Calkins; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Kosha Ruparel; Warren B Bilker; Tyler M Moore; Adam P Savitt; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Vince D Calhoun; Tulay Adali; Kent A Kiehl; Robert Astur; James J Pekar; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sabin Khadka; Shashwath A Meda; Michael C Stevens; David C Glahn; Vince D Calhoun; John A Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; Kasey O'Neil; David Schretlen; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Chandra Sripada; Saige Rutherford; Mike Angstadt; Wesley K Thompson; Monica Luciana; Alexander Weigard; Luke H Hyde; Mary Heitzeg Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Maria Jalbrzikowski; David Freedman; Catherine E Hegarty; Eva Mennigen; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Loes M Olde Loohuis; Roel A Ophoff; Raquel E Gur; Carrie E Bearden Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Anita D Barber; Deepak K Sarpal; Majnu John; Christina L Fales; Stewart H Mostofsky; Anil K Malhotra; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Todd Lencz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Monica D Rosenberg; Dustin Scheinost; Abigail S Greene; Emily W Avery; Young Hye Kwon; Emily S Finn; Ramachandran Ramani; Maolin Qiu; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Soo-Eun Chang; Michael Angstadt; Ho Ming Chow; Andrew C Etchell; Emily O Garnett; Ai Leen Choo; Daniel Kessler; Robert C Welsh; Chandra Sripada Journal: J Fluency Disord Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 2.538
Authors: Salome Kurth; Brady A Riedner; Douglas C Dean; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Reto Huber; Oskar G Jenni; Sean C L Deoni; Monique K LeBourgeois Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849