| Literature DB >> 29473914 |
Lazhen Shen1, Bei Li2, Yongsheng Qiao3.
Abstract
Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (NPs), the most traditional magnetic nanoparticles, have received a great deal of attention in the biomedical field, especially for targeted drug/gene delivery systems, due to their outstanding magnetism, biocompatibility, lower toxicity, biodegradability, and other features. Naked Fe₃O₄ NPs are easy to aggregate and oxidize, and thus are often made with various coatings to realize superior properties for targeted drug/gene delivery. In this review, we first list the three commonly utilized synthesis methods of Fe₃O₄ NPs, and their advantages and disadvantages. In the second part, we describe coating materials that exhibit noticeable features that allow functionalization of Fe₃O₄ NPs and summarize their methods of drug targeting/gene delivery. Then our efforts will be devoted to the research status and progress of several different functionalized Fe₃O₄ NP delivery systems loaded with chemotherapeutic agents, and we present targeted gene transitive carriers in detail. In the following section, we illuminate the most effective treatment systems of the combined drug and gene therapy. Finally, we propose opportunities and challenges of the clinical transformation of Fe₃O₄ NPs targeting drug/gene delivery systems.Entities:
Keywords: Fe3O4 nanoparticles; coating; drug/gene delivery systems; functionalization; synthesis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29473914 PMCID: PMC5849021 DOI: 10.3390/ma11020324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Functionalization of Fe3O4 NPs with different coatings for targeted drug delivery.
| Cell Lines | Loaded Drugs | Coating Materials | Releasing Factors | Refs. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doxorubicin (DOX) | Carboxymethyl chitosan (CS) | pH− | MCF-7, S180 (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| DOX | Sodium alyinate (SA), chitosan (CS), graphene oxide (GO), hyaluronic acid (HA) | pH−, near-infrared (NIR) | HeLa (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| DOX | Lactoferrin, GO | pH− | C6 (in vitro) | [ | |
| DOX | Poly( | pH−, thermosensitive | – | [ | |
| DOX, irinotecan | CS, GO, methoxypolyethylene glycol succinimidyl carbonate ester (mPEG-NHS) | pH− | U87 (in vitro) | [ | |
| 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) | Zr(HPO4)2·H2O, folic acid (FA), CS, R6G | pH− | A549, HEK293, HeLa (in vitro) | [ | |
| 5-Fu | β-cyclodextrin, polyethylenimine (PEI), polyethyline glycol (PEG), | Shell thickness, pH−, temperature | L929, MCF-7 (in vitro) | [ | |
| 5-Fu | GO, CS, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | pH− | – | [ | |
| Curcumin | FA, polyamidoamine (PAMAM) | FA receptor | SKOV3, HeLa (in vitro) | [ | |
| Curcumin | Silk fibroin | Silk fibroin concentration, pH− | MDA-MB-231 (in vitro) | [ | |
| Curcumin | CS, PEG, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) | Shell thickness, pH− | Caco-2, HCT-116 (in vitro) | [ | |
| C6 | FA, GO, Oleic acid (OA) | Light- and reductive-triggered | HeLa, A549 (in vitro) | [ | |
| C6, e6 | OA, silane | Light irradiation photodynamic | MCF-7 (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| Methoterxate (MTX) | Gold layer, Lipoic acid-PEG | NIR | KB, MRC-5, 4T1 (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| Nimustine, semustine, chlormethine | CA | Interact with DNA or prevent DNA relaxation | MHCC97-H, MCF-7 (in vitro) | [ | |
| nicotinamide | SiO2 | DNA binding interaction | - | [ | |
| Cytarabine | SiO2 | DNA binding interaction | HL-60, KG-1, Raji (in vitro) | [ | |
| Polypyrrole (PPy), HA | pH− | 4T, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 (in vitro) | [ | ||
| Gemcitabine | CS | pH− | SKBR, MCF-7 (in vitro) | [ | |
| Heteropolyacids (HPAs) | Starch- | Hydrolysis of polymer chains | – | [ | |
| Ciprofloxacin | CS | Low-frequency ultrasound | – | [ | |
| DOX | Gold nanorods and nanoclusters, bovine serum albumin (BSA) | NIR, magnetic triggered | HeLa (in vitro) | [ | |
| DOX | Graphene quantum dot, SiO2, FA | pH−, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) | HeLa (in vitro) | [ | |
| DOX | PEG, PEI, FA | pH− | MCF-7 (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| Cisplatin | PEI, Gd2O3, FA, PEG | pH−, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated toxicity | HeLa, NHLF (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| Cisplatin, DOX, artesunate | PEG, PEI, rhodamine B | pH−, ROS-mediated toxicity | A2780, ACP (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| Mycophenolic acid (MPA) | SiO2 | Release MPA by hydrolysis in cells | Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (in vitro) | [ | |
| VP16 | ZnO, mSiO2 | Microwave-triggered, pH−, temperature | – | [ | |
| VP16 | ZnO, Gd2O3:Eu, P(NIPAm- | Microwave, pH− | – | [ | |
| VP16 | mZnO | Microwave | – | [ | |
| VP16 | WO3, mSiO2, (3-aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (APTES) | Microwave, pH−, temperature | – | [ | |
| DOX | Azo | pH−, NIR | MCF-7, S180 (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| 5-Fu | PNIPAAM, mSiO2, CS, R6G | Thermoresponsive drug release | 7901 (in vitro) | [ | |
| Dihydroartemisinin | C and MIL-100 (Fe) | pH, ROS-mediated cytotoxicity | A549, HeLa (in vivo/in vitro) | [ | |
| HSP70 | Polydopamine | NIR | HCT116 (in vitro) | [ | |
| Ibuprofen | Metal-organic frameworks, GO | Drug release controlled by layers | – | [ |
Figure 1Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of Fe3O4 NPs prepared by (a,b) co-precipitation method [23,44]; (c–f) thermal decomposition method [50]; and solvothermal method (g) as in [54], (h) as in [39].
Figure 2TEM images Fe2O3@SiO2 microspheres with different SiO2 shell thicknesses: (a) 15 nm; (b) 35 nm; (c) 50 nm; and (d) 80 nm; and (e–h) their corresponding TEM images of rattle-type Fe3O4@SiO2 hollow microspheres [83].
Figure 3Illustration of the fabrication of Fe3O4@MOFs/GO microspheres [79]. MOFs: metal-organic frameworks; GO: graphene oxide.
Figure 4Illustration of the preparation process of (a) Fe3O4@SiO2@GdVO4:Dy3+ and (b) Fe3O4@SiO2@GdVO4:Eu3+ nanocomposites [55,104].
Figure 5(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of a thermosensitive drug-delivery system based on Fe3O4–Azo NPs for chemo-photothermal therapy in vitro and in vivo; (b) DOX release from Fe3O4–Azo NPs at pH 5.7, pH 6.4, and pH 7.4 with and without irradiation (The laser groups were irradiated repeatedly over a period of 5 min, followed by 1 h intervals without irradiation.); (c) Relative growth curves of tumors in different treatment groups within 15 days [77].
Figure 6(a) Schematic illustration of targeting of dihydroartemisinin (DHA)-loaded Fe3O4@C@MIL-100(Fe) (FCM) nanoparticles to tumor cells assisted by an externally applied magnetic field; and (b) the anticancer mechanism of the DHA delivery system [78].
Functionalization of Fe3O4 NPs with different coatings for targeted gene delivery.
| Preparation Method | Coating Materials | Loaded Gene | Gene Connection | Cell Lines | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS, PEG, catechol, PEI | pRFP DNA | Electrostatic interactions between PEI and plasmid DNA | SF767 human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (in vitro) | [ | |
| Chlorotoxin, CS, PEG, PEI | Green fluorescent protein (GFP) encoding DNA | Electrostatic interactions between PEI and DNA | C6 (in vivo) | [ | |
| CA-silane, PEI | p-encoding green fluorescent protein (pEGFP), pGL3, pCMV-Luc | Electrostatic interactions of PEI with DNA and carboxylic acid | HepG2 (in vitro/in vivo) | [ | |
| PAMAM dendrimer | CpG oligodeoxynucleotide | Electrostatic interactions between PAMAM and DNA | MDA-MB231, SKBR3 (in vitro) | [ | |
| Dopamine, PEG-NH2 | DNA, Pcambia, PGEM-T | Electrostatic interactions between amino groups and plasmid DNA | Escherichia coli cells (in vitro) | [ | |
| PEG, liposomes, gold | Chol-DNA | Au coating provided anchorage points for DNA to be attached | – | [ | |
| PEI | DNA constructed by pGL3-basic to pcDNA3 vector | Electrostatic interactions between PEI and plasmid DNA | ALTS1C1, PC3, HEK293T (in vitro) | [ | |
| Ethanolamin-functionalized poly(glycidyl methacrylate), SiO2, APTES | EGFP encoding plasmid DNA | Electrostatic interactions between linked polymer and plasmid DNA | HepG2, C6, HEK293 (in vitro/in vivo) | [ |
Figure 7(a) Synthesis process of the Fe3O4@DOX/DNA/OEI1800-EHDO (FDDP) nanosystem for magnetic targeted drug/gene co-delivery and MRI; (b) transfection activity and cell cytotoxicity of various samples in HeLa cells after 30 min of treatment with/without magnetic field; and (c) cytotoxicity of DOX and pGL-3 co-loaded FDDP NPs and DOX and p53 co-loaded FDD(p53)P NPs in HeLa cells under magnetic field [129].