| Literature DB >> 29471822 |
Sidsel Nag1,2, Poul-Erik Kofoed3,4, Johan Ursing4,5,6, Camilla Koldbæk Lemvigh7, Rosa Lundbye Allesøe7, Amabelia Rodrigues4, Christina Aaby Svendsen8, Jacob Dyring Jensen8, Michael Alifrangis9,10, Ole Lund7, Frank M Aarestrup8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a major health burden and genomic research represents one of the necessary approaches for continued progress towards malaria control and elimination. Sample acquisition for this purpose is troublesome, with the majority of malaria-infected individuals living in rural areas, away from main infrastructure and the electrical grid. The aim of this study was to describe a low-tech procedure to sample P. falciparum specimens for direct whole genome sequencing (WGS), without use of electricity and cold-chain.Entities:
Keywords: Dried blood spots; Dried erythrocyte spots; Leukocyte depletion; Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; Sub-Saharan Africa; Whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29471822 PMCID: PMC5824530 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2232-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Sampling diagram. Malaria patients donated 2–3 ml of venous blood, which was left to precipitate for approximately 30 min (1) prior to removal of the plasma and buffy coat, using a Pasteur pipette (2). A new Pasteur pipette was used to add PBS to the erythrocytes, and the tube was inverted 3–4 times to mix PBS and erythrocytes (3). The PBS-diluted erythrocytes were then sucked into a syringe, which was applied to a Plasmodipur filter, and pressure was applied until the entire sample had been filtered (4). The filtered PBS-diluted erythrocytes were then left to precipitate for approximately 3 h, before the PBS was removed using yet another Pasteur pipette (5). The erythrocytes were finally dotted on Whatman filter paper #3, as three Pasteur-pipette drops per spot (6)
Correlation between parasitaemia and sample applicability for direct WGS
| Parasitaemia | Applicable count | Applicable % | Inapplicable count | Inapplicable % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 10,000 | 28 | 58 | 20 | 42 |
| 10,000 | 48 | 72 | 19 | 28 |
| 20,000 | 5 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 30,000 | 20 | 74 | 7 | 26 |
| 40,000 | 24 | 77 | 7 | 23 |
| > 50,000 | 19 | 90 | 2 | 10 |
OR = 1.29 (95% CI 1.07–1.58) p = 0.009
Correlation between parasitaemia and sample applicability for direct WGS N = 199, parasitaemias are given as parasites/µl, calculated according to a leukocyte count of 8000 per µl whole blood. Parasites and leukocytes were counted by microscopy, counting until 500 parasites or 200 leukocytes. Samples were grouped in five groups according to parasitaemia, corresponding to intervals of 10,000 parasites/µl. The minimum parasitaemia recorded in group 1 was 800 parasites/µl, and the maximum parasitaemia recorded in group 5 was 81,633 parasites/µl. Applicable/inapplicable count corresponds to the number of samples. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between parasitaemia of the infection and applicability of the sample for WGS. OR (odds ratio), CI (confidence interval) and pI-value (p) are given
Samples selected for WGS
| Sample | Parasite count | Leukocyte count | Parasitaemia (paras./μl) | Parasitaemia (%) | Malaria (%) | Human (%) | Other (%) | Average read depth | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98 | 200 | 3920 | 0.1 | 46.1 | 35.2 | 18.7 | 16× | 87.5 |
| 2 | 214 | 200 | 8560 | 0.2 | 67.1 | 13.7 | 19.2 | 15× | 88.4 |
| 3 | 420 | 200 | 16,800 | 0.4 | 62.2 | 6.4 | 31.4 | 41× | 95.3 |
| 4 | 500 | 102 | 39,216 | 1.0 | 81.7 | 3.5 | 14.8 | 67× | 97.8 |
| 5 | 500 | 83 | 48,193 | 1.2 | 48.1 | 15.6 | 36.3 | 99× | 98.9 |
Parasitaemia is given as parasites/µl (as described in Table 1, and in “Methods”) as well as in percentage, which is calculated according to an assumed erythrocyte count of 4000,000 erythrocytes per µl whole blood. Sequencing reads were mapped to a variety of databases, including a human database and a malaria database, using MGmapper (see “Methods”) [18]. The percentage of raw reads mapping to human, malaria and other databases are listed, as well as the average read depth of the sample and coverage as compared to the 3d7 reference genome
Fig. 2Read distribution across reference genome. From outermost ring: 3D7 reference genome chromosomes 1–14 (number written in roman letters, chromosomes illustrated to scale). Histograms representing read depths averaged over 2000 bp for sample 5, sample 4, sample 3, sample 2 and sample 1 (such that parasitaemia decreases from outer to inner most ring). The image was produced using the Circos software (see “Methods”) [22]
Fig. 3Chromosomal distribution of uncovered bases. The percentage of uncovered bases of each chromosome (number of uncovered bases on chromosome/size of chromosome *100) is depicted for each sample