Literature DB >> 29470950

Not seeking yet trying long-acting reversible contraception: a 24-month randomized trial on continuation, unintended pregnancy and satisfaction.

David Hubacher1, Hannah Spector2, Charles Monteith2, Pai-Lien Chen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the 24-month impact on continuation, unintended pregnancy and satisfaction of trying long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in a population seeking short-acting reversible contraception (SARC). STUDY
DESIGN: We enrolled 916 women aged 18-29 who were seeking pills or injectables in a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women with strong preferences for pills or injectables started on those products, while others opted for randomization to LARC or SARC and received their methods gratis. We estimated continuation and unintended pregnancy rates through 24months. Intent-to-treat principles were applied after method initiation for comparing incidence of unintended pregnancy. We also examined how satisfaction levels varied by cohort and how baseline negative LARC attitudes were associated with satisfaction over time.
RESULTS: Forty-three percent chose randomization, and 57% chose the preference option. Complete loss to follow-up was<2%. The 24-month LARC continuation probability was 64.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 56.6-70.9], statistically higher than SARC groups [25.5% (randomized) and 40.0% (preference)]. The 24-month cumulative unintended pregnancy probabilities were 9.9% (95% CI: 7.2-12.6) (preference-SARC), 6.9% (95% CI: 3.3-10.6) (randomized-SARC) and 3.6% (95% CI: 1.8-6.4) (randomized-LARC). Statistical tests for comparing randomized groups on unintended pregnancy were mixed: binomial at 24-month time point (p=.02) and log-rank survival probabilities (p=.14 for first pregnancies and p=.07 when including second pregnancies). LARC satisfaction was high (80% happy/neutral, 73% would use LARC again, 81% would recommend to a friend). Baseline negative attitudes toward LARC (27%) were not clearly associated with satisfaction or early discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: The decision to try LARC resulted in high continuation rates and substantial protection from unintended pregnancy over 24months. Despite participants' initial desires to begin short-acting regimens, they had high satisfaction with LARC. Voluntary decisions to try LARC will benefit large proportions of typical SARC users. IMPLICATIONS: Even women who do not necessarily view LARC as a first choice may have a highly satisfying experience and avoid unintended pregnancy if they try it.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability, contraceptive continuation; Adherence; Long-acting reversible contraception; Randomized; Unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29470950      PMCID: PMC6331179          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

1.  Projections and opinions from 100 experts in long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Rana Barar; Heather Gould; Ivette Gomez; Deborah Nguyen; M Antonia Biggs
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Marion Carter; Kathryn Curtis; Evelyn Glass; Emily Godfrey; Arik Marcell; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Karen Pazol; Naomi Tepper; Lauren Zapata
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

3.  Contraceptive methods available to patients of office-based physicians and title X clinics --- United States, 2009-2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  The quest for patient-centered family planning.

Authors:  David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  What qualities of long-acting reversible contraception do women perceive as desirable or undesirable? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jacqueline Coombe; Melissa L Harris; Deborah Loxton
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  Reassessing Unintended Pregnancy: Toward a Patient-centered Approach to Family Planning.

Authors:  Jessica E Morse; Shanthi Ramesh; Andrea Jackson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen; Catherine Hart
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen; Catherine Hart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Micaela O'Neil-Callahan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tessa Madden; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont.

Authors:  Catalina N Rey; Gary J Badger; Heidi S Melbostad; Deborah Wachtel; Stacey C Sigmon; Lauren K MacAfee; Anne K Dougherty; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Ela; Kathleen Broussard; Katie Hansen; Kristen L Burke; Lauren Thaxton; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Review of Insertion and Device Reimbursement Policies.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Keriann Uesugi; Lisa Romero; Olivia R Sappenfield; Julia F Howland; Shanna Cox
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-10-01

5.  Comparison of pregnancy incidence among African women in a randomized trial of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (IUDs) or a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant for contraception.

Authors:  Maricianah Onono; Kavita Nanda; Kate B Heller; Doug Taylor; Irina Yacobson; Renee Heffron; Margaret Phiri Kasaro; Cheryl E Louw; Zelda Nhlabasti; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Jenni Smit; Imelda Wakhungu; Peter B Gichangi; Nelly R Mugo; Charles Morrison; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Maria Wemrell; Lena Gunnarsson
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Attitudes and Acceptability in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Key to Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

Authors:  Molly J Richards; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Jeanelle Sheeder
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Contraceptive method type and satisfaction, confidence in use, and switching intentions.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Daniel Marthey; Liyang Xie; Michel Boudreaux
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.