Literature DB >> 35459591

Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans.

Elizabeth J Ela1, Kathleen Broussard2, Katie Hansen3, Kristen L Burke2, Lauren Thaxton4, Joseph E Potter5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior longitudinal studies of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) satisfaction and continuation guaranteed their participants access to LARC removal. Under real-world conditions, LARC users who wish to discontinue may experience barriers to LARC removal.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study recruited 1,700 postpartum Texans without private insurance from 8 hospitals in 6 cities. Our analysis included the 418 respondents who initiated LARC in the 24 months after childbirth. A content analysis of open-ended survey responses identified three categories of LARC users: satisfied, resigned, and dissatisfied. Satisfied LARC users were using their method of choice. Resigned users were using LARC as an alternative method when their preferred method was inaccessible. Dissatisfied users were unhappy with LARC. Multinomial logistic regression models identified risk factors for resignation and dissatisfaction. Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in LARC discontinuation by satisfaction and sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Participants completed 1,505 surveys while using LARC. LARC users were satisfied in 83.46% of survey responses, resigned in 5.25%, and dissatisfied in 11.30%. Resignation was more likely if respondents were uninsured or wanted sterilization at the time of childbirth. The risk of dissatisfaction increased with time using LARC and was higher among uninsured respondents. U.S.-born Hispanic LARC users were more likely than foreign-born Hispanic LARC users to be dissatisfied and less likely to discontinue when dissatisfied. Dissatisfaction-but not resignation-predicted discontinuation. Cost, lack of insurance, and difficulty obtaining an appointment were frequent barriers to LARC removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Most postpartum LARC users were satisfied, but users who wished to discontinue frequently encountered barriers. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35459591      PMCID: PMC9283300          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  27 in total

1.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Continuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives among Medicaid patients.

Authors:  Max J Romano; Patryce Toye; Loral Patchen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Jessica R Rosenstock; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; David A Klein; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  "I wish they could hold on a little longer": physicians' experiences with requests for early IUD removal.

Authors:  Jennifer R Amico; Ariana H Bennett; Alison Karasz; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: the time is now.

Authors:  Michelle Moniz; Tammy Chang; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  The Availability and Use of Postpartum LARC in Mexico and Among Hispanics in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Celia Hubert; Kari White
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

9.  Hospital variation in postpartum tubal sterilization rates in California and Texas.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Amanda J Stevenson; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Variation by state in Medicaid sterilization policies for physician reimbursement.

Authors:  Heather Bouma-Johnston; Roselle Ponsaran; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.